Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why We're Skeptical Of LeBron James

When points mattered, the better team won


The Montreal Canadiens blew a two goal lead over the Buffalo Sabres, and with the Toronto Maple Leafs doing them a favor by beating the Boston Bruins, still had a chance to get two big points in overtime.

That didn't happen, so they were off to a shootout where they held a 2-0 edge. The Sabres again battled back, and finally got the win in round 10 to claim a 3-2 victory.

The Canadiens at least salvaged a point, and are now tied in points with Boston. The Bruins maintain the Northeast Division lead, having a game in hand. The Sabres, in the meantime, now sit two points out of a playoff spot.

With the games left to play slowly counting down, this was one of those games where that extra point will come into play when the final standings are posted.

"We were back on our heels the second half of the game," said Habs captain Brian Gionta. "We gotta do a better job of closing teams out, when we have a chance. We need to find our consistency."

Star-divide

The Canadiens were dominant in the first period, out-shooting the Sabres 18-7 through twenty minutes. It should be noted that at one point it was a 17-4 edge. P.K. Subban pointed out that the Canadiens were drifting from the game plan, when interviewed on Versus after the period ended. Unfortunately the drift continued the rest of the night.

Against some teams, you can get away with that. But when you are playing a hot Sabres team, and a coach in Lindy Ruff who may be one of the best in adapting midway in a game, it's not going to happen.

"It's not about (not having a) killer instinct," said Canadiens' coach Jacques Martin. "It's about keeping the pace up. You gotta be consistent and focused away from the puck."

It also may have helped the Sabres that Jhonas Enroth played a solid first period, and carried it the rest of the night. The recent Sabres call-up made 32 saves on the night.

While the Canadiens broke down, their goaltender didn't. Carey Price, with a little help from his posts, bailed out his teammates on several occasions, especially on turnovers (14 on the night) literally right in front of him. Price's glove save of Jason Pominville,  in overtime, may have been one of the best glove stops of the season.

From the blueline, a unit who's number two guy, in terms of experience on the Canadiens, is Subban (29:22) did a reasonable job under the circumstances. It seemed a lack of support from the forwards was a contribution to the team's downfall. Brendon Nash had a respectable debut, blocking four shots in just under 12 minutes TOI.

Martin continued to juggle most of his forward lines in an effort to find the equation that produces some offense. Suffice to say, the absence of Mike Cammalleri again shows it could be a long ride to the playoffs without him. Even longer if the ones who should also be producing do not begin to show up. I won't name names, but when you are expected to be a top-six forward, but don't go until the seventh or eighth round of a shootout...

The Canadiens are expected to have a morning practice Wednesday, before heading off to Edmonton for their three-game Western Canada road trip.

The voice of the team that earned the extra point at Die By The Blade

 

   SCORERS
  First period
04:54 MTL Max Pacioretty, 10 (PP) (Tomas Plekanec, 27 Roman Hamrlik, 21) (BUF: 55 3 29 44 1   MTL: 44 21 14 31 68 67)
  Second period
06:28 MTL Benoit Pouliot, 13 (David Desharnais, 7 James Wisniewski, 32) (BUF: 21 44 1 24 57 63   MTL: 20 57 31 58 53 76)
17:48 BUF Drew Stafford, 24 (PP) (Thomas Vanek, 27 Tim Connolly, 17) (BUF: 19 3 29 26 21 1   MTL: 32 14 20 45 31)
  Third period
06:08 BUF Jason Pominville, 13 (Jochen Hecht, 14 Nathan Gerbe, 10) (BUF: 55 29 44 42 1 57   MTL: 44 11 32 20 46 31)
  First overtime
None
  Shootout
00:00 BUF Jochen Hecht, 10 (BUF: 1   MTL: 31)
 
   Team Shots Faceoffs
 
Sabres
Canadiens
1 2 3 OT Total
7 15 7 3 32
18 8 5 3 34
Won Lost
31 36
36 31

Comment 9 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Jacques Martin..

Has no idea how to get the best from his players. It’s always so predictable.

Nothing Is Fool proof if you have the right fools.

by GiantsCauseway on Feb 16, 2011 10:35 AM EST reply actions  

I’m not sure I get all the pessimism. Sorry if I’m overreacting here, but this idea that the Habs are in “a long ride to the playoffs” or any other phrase that indicates they’ll have to work hard to have a chance to make it really gets at me due to its sheer lack of realism.

They’re still on pace to finish 10 points clear of 8th place. They’re still at a point where a (very disappointing) .500 record the rest of the way will see them comfortably in the playoffs — and quite possibly in 7th on 6th place, at that. Their microstats would not look out of place in the mighty Central division.

The Habs have four regular D-men and roughly 20 million in salary in injuries. They’re still inching ever closer to third place (as the Bruins are, predictably, falling back down to Earth)

I do wish Martin would break up the Gomez-Kostitsyn combination which has not produced anything good, but both have been fine with other linemates before so it’s not like this is an insoluble problem.

The reality here is that the Habs are fighting for seeding, not for a playoff spot. And any seeding where they face Boston in the first round has to be considered pretty good, for my money.

by MathMan on Feb 16, 2011 10:55 AM EST reply actions  

I agree. The headline is extremely misleading and based on analyzing the result.

They lost a shootout. An individual exercise based on random events of luck.

An inch inside the post and Subban wins the game. If Ruff sends his forwards out in a different order after the first 3 shots the Habs win and this story has the same headline but a different result.

The pessimism is based on fear and lack of understanding at how the Habs are winning. So everybody fears a collapse to reality like the teams from 2006-2010.

by Chris Boyle on Feb 16, 2011 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Chris,

Yes they lost in a shootout and I agree that there is randomness and luck there.

My point is that the Habs should not have got to a shootout to begin with. The team collapsed and let the Sabres catch them.

I’m not saying it risks the Habs not making the playoffs, but final positioning (ie: home ice) could factor in with a point lost here or there.

Kevin van Steendelaar

http://www.twitter.com/kvansteendelaar

but don't forget...

http://www.twitter.com/HabsEOTP

by Kevin van Steendelaar on Feb 16, 2011 12:12 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah, but if they won the shootout (which you agree is random) then the better team wouldn’t have won the game and all the exact things would have played out.

Like I said, it is analyzing the score and result and not what occurred on the ice.

The Leafs came back against the Bruins and won 4-3. Did the better team take that game away or is it just one of 2400 random results in a season?

All I said is the headline is misleading. The game was 65 minutes and the Habs were the better team for at least 30 minutes of it. That denotes an even game to me in which one stormed out to a lead and dominated early and the other fought back to even it late.

The OT was fairly even and the shootout went to 10 shooters. If you remove the first 20 minutes of the game then it fits the narrative, but you can’t.

by Chris Boyle on Feb 16, 2011 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Chris, I thought you knew me better than that re; the headline

When I say “the better team” I am referring the team that wanted the win. As you said, you felt the Habs tapered off after 30 minutes. Personally I felt it was much sooner, and the Canadiens played like they didn’t want it. The Sabres kept at it and forced the OT.

And with the referalls to randomness, the Sabres ringed a few off the post that could have made it a 3-2 win for them in regulation, and we’d be talking a whole different game.

Kevin van Steendelaar

http://www.twitter.com/kvansteendelaar

but don't forget...

http://www.twitter.com/HabsEOTP

by Kevin van Steendelaar on Feb 16, 2011 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t believe in things like “wanted it more”. I think it is a cliche that is used to explain or create a narrative based on the result.

Who wanted it more? Washington or Montreal in the playoffs last season?

Is that answer dependent on the result? Does it get answered by the sheer volume of shots that Washington peppered on Montreal? That could define the Canadiens wanting it more last night. Or does it get answered because the Canadiens won? That would be defined by the Sabres win last night.

That game was an evenly played game that was going to be won by the team who got the best bounce at the end. There are about 20 events that occurred that could have shifted the balance of the game, Buffalo got 11 of them.

by Chris Boyle on Feb 16, 2011 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

For the record, I did not say the Habs won’t make the playoffs.

By long ride, I was relating to final positioning, which you note in your last paragraph.

Ultimately, it is these kind of games that will decide where and who the Habs play in the first round.

It’s also a type of game a team cannot play against any opponent in the playoffs, where you don’t get any games to make up the difference.

Kevin van Steendelaar

http://www.twitter.com/kvansteendelaar

but don't forget...

http://www.twitter.com/HabsEOTP

by Kevin van Steendelaar on Feb 16, 2011 12:19 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

You can play that type of game in the playoffs. The Habs did it about 6 times last season and won. They actually played worse games in the playoffs and won.

They were unlucky last night. Max Pac rings one of the post minutes before the Sabres tied it. If it goes in, then they bury that game and the game story changes based on the 3-1 win. We are talking about how great and gutty they were to win with 4 defensemen out of the lineup.

This game was a toss up in which the Sabres had just a little more fortune than Montreal.

by Chris Boyle on Feb 16, 2011 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Montreal Canadiens.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Triple_low_five_small
The Bergevin Bunch – Who should be on the Canadiens’ Shortlist?
Triple_low_five_small
Anti-GM Race: The Search for the Worst Candidate
Triple_low_five_small
Habs GM Search: My Personal Shortlist
Ts_small
Vintage Hockey Jersey Scam
Predsgame_small
So yeah...
Lokomotiv_yaroslavl_logo_small
Welcome Mount Royal Soccer to SB Nation
Triple_low_five_small
The Montreal Canadiens and the Future
Picture_1_small
Other Crazy Eklund Trade Rumours
Picture_1_small
Randy Cunneyworth's Link To Homer Simpson

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

A Glossary of Analytical Stat Terms

For those unfamiliar with common terms on EOTP such as Fenwick, PDO or relative Corsi, here is a handy explanation.

Click here to access the glossary


Managing Editor

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small Kevin van Steendelaar

Feature Editors

A_new_eotp_logo_small Robert L

P1020029_small Andrew Berkshire

Butch-montreal__2__-_copie__4__small Francis B.

Small Chris Boyle

Lokomotiv_yaroslavl_logo_small Bruce Peter

Small Stephan Cooper

Contributing Writers

Small Olivier

Jp_small Joe Pelletier

Profile_small Melissa_Boufounos