Game 24 Recap: Habs Lose A Crazy One In OT
Before we start, let's get one thing straight: the Montreal Canadiens deserved to lose this game. They were outplayed massively by the Pittsburgh Penguins for the majority of the game as the Penguins' top 2 lines cycled the puck through the Habs depleted lineup with ease.
Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin were particularly dominant, and when on the ice together it was downright scary.
Malkin scored on a lucky bounce just 21 seconds into the game as a pass went off P.K. Subban's skate to Chris Kunitz, who found Malkin uncovered in the slot.
The Habs answered just over a minute later however as Travis Moen capitalized on a turnover after Lars Eller gained the zone and Andrei Kostitsyn caused some havoc in the Penguins zone.
The Habs continued to be opportunistic as Erik Cole broke in, shot the puck of Marc-Andre Fleury's pads and right to David Desharnais. Desharnais was covered by a Penguins defender, but had the patience and presence of mind to find Max Pacioretty in the slot, who roofed one past Fleury to give Montreal a lead.
The Habs would build on that lead when Cole finished off a brilliant play by Pacioretty and P.K. Subban. The initial shot hit the crossbar, but it bounced off of Fleury's backside and in.
Perhaps it was score effects, but the Penguins dominated the second period to a ridiculous degree. Carey Price was fantastic as the shots were 16-5 and the possession was possibly even worse for the Habs. Pascal Dupuis took advantage of the pressure with a smart play and ripped a shot into the net to bring the Penguins within one.
Jordan Staal tied the game with under 5 minutes left on an odd play where he looked covered but Yannick Weber played him like it was a 2-on-1, which it wasn't. Staal made a good move on Price and put it in short side.
Unfortunately, Pacioretty laid a borderline hit on Kris Letang towards the end of the 3rd period. Letang had the puck, but it looked like the principle point of contact was the head. Letang went down in a heap and was bleeding from his face, presumably from his visor cutting him.
Pacioretty apologized to Letang after the game, saying:
"I felt terrible that he got hurt & I'm thankful that he came back. I'm sorry for what happened. I hope he's okay."
Letang, class act that he is, pointed this out after the game and said he appreciated it. We all hope that Letang actually is okay and will continue to play at a high level. Expect Pacioretty to have a call with Brendan Shanahan tomorrow, and judging by his decisions so far Pacioretty will likely get 1-2 games.
Confusing however, is the Penguins' decision to put Letang back on the ice in overtime. You would think that franchise had learned the danger of such a situation with Crosby missing nearly a year due to stupidity on their own part. The quiet room rule continues to be ignored in the NHL. it's a mockery of the health and safety rules the Penguins franchise pretends they support.
Letang performed the common concussed player return feat and "scored" in overtime. Unfortunately for the Habs, the Penguins straddled the line of legality all night. Two brutally obvious illegal goals were called back, and the officials had no interest in calling back a third one, in spite of Carey Price having the puck covered for several second. Carey Price was furious after the game, saying:
"I clearly had my hand over the puck. Clearly. That's the end of it, that's it. He [the ref] didn't say anything to me, he ran off the ice."
Like I said earlier, the Habs earned a loss tonight, but not this way. When you lose a game, it should be to the other team, not the people responsible for enforcing the rules of the game.
Worrying Stat?: The top line of Mike Cammalleri - Tomas Plekanec - Brian Gionta is a whopping -16 in the last 3 games. Gionta is -9 over that time.
A bit of a rant: Officiating has too big of an impact on NHL hockey right now. The game is too fast to fully rely on fallible, and often incompetent individuals. It is about time the NHL embraces the technology it has available to get the calls right. No more of this garbage that is a favourite retort of Ron MacLean about a "human element" to the game. That's an excuse for getting calls wrong when there shouldn't be one. Half the officials in the NHL aren't qualified to do their job.
Not all of that is their fault, the NHL abruptly moving to a 2 ref system necessitated graduating too many people who weren't experienced enough and the fans have been suffering for years. Combine that with too many rules that are loosely defined (roughing for example) as well as zero accountability among officials and you get a league of gutless yes-men who do nothing but parrot the party line. How sad is it that a coach questioning the referees gets fined in the NHL? How does that even make sense?
And don't tell me that taking some responsibility away from the refs is a bad thing, they already have too much responsibility. Make their job easier by being consistent. Rules shouldn't change depending on context of the game or time of year. In many ways the refs are victims here too. It seems like a lot of them have no idea what is and is not a penalty. There shouldn't be pressure on a ref to call the flow of the game, let them do their job and call it properly and consistently from puck drop to the final buzzer.
Three Stars: 1) Kris Letang 2) Erik Cole 3) Carey Price
Advanced Stats: Shift Charts / Head to Head / Corsi & Fenwick
The winning side of things from PensBurgh
Read up on the Habs' next opponents over at Anaheim Calling
56 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
“Deserving” to lose a game has never stopped the Habs’ opponents this year. They’ve yet to steal a win really.
I know, but like you brought up yesterday, I feel less angry about it when they get outplayed and lose. There’s always the questions about what they did wrong, but at this point I’m so beyond frustrated with the luck situation that losing when they should win puts me in a mood hockey should not be capable of producing.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 26, 2011 11:52 PM EST up reply actions
At this point I really just want wins. I’m (admittedly prematurely) worried about missing out the playoffs. I’m also getting tired of all the stories about how bad the Habs are and how the front office and coach should be cleaned out and the whole thing blown up.
The whole “blow up the team” and “fire everyone” nonsense is out of control. Then again even with a reasonably successful regular season last year, the same crap was being said. It never ends, it just intensifies after losses.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:09 AM EST up reply actions
The problem is, way too many people are convinced that “blow it up” is the only to build a successful team despite ample evidence to the contrary. And with the Habs in the bottom-10 of the league standings, it gets more steam.
Nothing gets on my nerves more than the idiocy that sucking for years is the path to success. Getting Crosby/Maklin (or Hall/RNH) is a sign of incompetence at the big club level, not a brilliant plan. Most bottom feeders stay there despite the high picks. It’s a real zombie idea, no matter how many times you kill it someone will always bring it up regardless.
It’s becoming very clear to me though that a lot of commentors don’t especially want a winning team. They want to be entertained. That’s why there’s such hatred vs. Martin, who is seen as boring, and they want to tank because they want star scoring forwards.
This is so true. I could care less if a game is 1-0, I want a win. Also a lot of hockey fans think nothing is entertaining but goals. I enjoy a good tactical hockey game just like I enjoy a good tactical soccer game.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:24 AM EST up reply actions
Tactical illiteracy is really the problem here. How many fans complained about Moen being on a “scoring line” when in fact he was on the top matchup line?
That’s a failure of the media. They should know better. Tremblay was an assistant for Jacques freaking Lemaire for years. But when are power-on-power matchups brought up? Practically never.
One of the few things to like about McGuire.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:35 AM EST up reply actions
The NHL needs to change the rules there. I understand pushing for parity, but don’t reward bad management. All teams who miss the playoffs should have equal odds to the first 14 picks. The last 16 should be in order of regular season position, playoffs should not be a factor.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:23 AM EST up reply actions
that’s a bit over the top…I always thought the nba draft lottery system was better: more teams can move up, and finishing last gives you just 25% chance of getting the 1st pick
I see it as promoting parity but not failure. I’d rather see a team that’s building towards being good and just misses the playoffs get rewarded than a team like Columbus, who’re constantly run into the ground through incompetence.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:36 AM EST up reply actions
ya, but equal chance is a bit harsh...
the nba system is solid, top three teams have 25-21-17% chance at 1st pick, and three teams can “win” the lottery (though from the back end, chances of moving up to the top 3 are something like 2%). Still, there has to be some parity measure for doing badly, just no reason to try to finish dead last (in the nba, the worst team generally doesnt end up picking first)
I mean it to be harsh though. Teams shouldn’t be given brownie points in the way of lottery picks because they suck.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 1:00 AM EST up reply actions
Tanking = Stanley Cup! Haven’t you heard? Ask Columbus!
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:17 AM EST up reply actions
Or the Atlanta Thrashers!
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
by Bruce Peter on Nov 27, 2011 12:21 AM EST up reply actions
Or the Washington Capitals!
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:21 AM EST up reply actions
Or the Panthers!
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:24 AM EST up reply actions
And trading Cam Barker. That helped a lot.
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
by Bruce Peter on Nov 27, 2011 12:28 AM EST up reply actions
You know it’s bad when someone like Derek Zona thinks it’s positive that Barker is out.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:40 AM EST up reply actions
People never seem to remember that Chicago sucked for like 15 years before they won, it wasn’t just a 5 year plan where they tank 3 times then make the playoffs on year, win the cup the next.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:34 AM EST up reply actions
It must be Black Friday sale weekend, because NHL refs are abusing Prices.
i stole this from…i think it was twitter?…it was on the sidebar of some website…
I like it.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:03 AM EST up reply actions
Do you guys have confirmation Letang wasn’t taken to the quiet room?
Hockey Blogger at Pensburgh.com
The quiet room thing is supposed to last 15 minutes, he wasn’t gone that long. Apparently he was tested for a concussion and came out fine, then they set his nose which was broken.
However those tests are usually more effective after some time, and honestly with how incredibly good Letang is, for a regular season game on a first place team, they should have sat him out. I say this as a fan of Kris Letang.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:05 AM EST up reply actions
well, having to be walked halfway around the rink, examined for concussion syndromes and walked back should have taken longer…plus, they would have changed his jersey if he was anywhere near the locker rooms…so it seems like a reasonable assumption.
we’re also just bitter that a shit goal ended the game. we have too many shit goals end games for us (anyone here remember game 7 against boston through the cloud of sorrow-induced alcoholism?)
I missed the game, saw Brendan Gallagher’s team absolutely dominate my Blades tonight (though Gallagher wasn’t a huge factor, though he obviously stood out as talented).
But if Pacioretty is on record with the NHL after tonight and Chara isn’t, it’s a crime of willful negligence.
Do any replays actually show the puck as being even sort of visible on the winner? The highlights I saw didn’t show anything, but they could’ve been misleading.
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
Not to be pessimistic, but you know how NHL justice works, Bruce.
Pacioretty is an player of no great repute on a largely irrelevant team with no real stars to speak of. Chara and Letang are both superstar D-men on elite, flagship American franchises.
Who gets the benefit of the doubt, really?
the funny thing is people over at the pens site are saying the same thing (but in reverse): oh, patches plays for one of the most popular teams, so the league isnt going to suspend him…
The only reason for Pacioretty getting off is potential guilt that the NHL office has for failing him personally. And I doubt they possess that.
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
by Bruce Peter on Nov 27, 2011 12:23 AM EST up reply actions
If they actually apply their rules, a case can definitely be made for the shoulder as the principle point of contact, as well as for Letang shifting position at the very last moment. I think that the idea of the NHL applying its rules is a joke. Shanahan’s resolve didn’t even last into the regular season, and the new sheriff is pretty much the same as the old one now.
i actually saw that hit the same way that the one on (was it campoli?) us was at the beginning of the year: shanny said that the head contact happened because the player dropped his head. For patches, coming from where he did, there was no other place for him to hit, since letang’s head is sticking way out
There is also precedent if they don’t suspend him. The hit has a few similarities to the Malone on Campoli hit. Letang moves his head after Pacioretty is set for the hit. I personally don’t believe he moved it enough to be a factor, but I think Malone should have been suspended too.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:26 AM EST up reply actions
Since you all made the same point, I guess the NHL might not suspend Pacioretty for the ’we’re making shit up as we go along and don’t have any balls’ reason.
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
by Bruce Peter on Nov 27, 2011 12:27 AM EST up reply actions
I don’t think any of what we said matters, nor does the rulebook have much impact here.
I think what will matter is an unhyped Hab hitting an important Penguin. If it had been a second-pairing D-man, they might have applied the rules. Or if the Habs had any star players, one of them might have gotten a second look.
Shanahan has lost a ton of credibility since preseason. And it’s not a coincidence that consistency went out the window as soon as a few anonymous GMs started bitching in the paper.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:32 AM EST up reply actions
The wheel of justice is certainly back in full force, and the Bruins are still immune.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:37 AM EST up reply actions
…..and he’s got video to back it up! LOL
"It's only through change we learn to grow".
by Canadian Jet on Nov 27, 2011 2:32 AM EST up reply actions
then again, it also looks a bit similar to the (i think) david booth hit, where the guy cutting across to shoot is hit from the side.
I guess my point is, the league bases the severity of punishments on outcome more than on action (chara excluded), soo, if there is a suspension, it shouldnt be anything special
Things are so backward that I think Pacioretty will be suspended because of the Chara hit. You know, to send the message that you can’t get way with illegal hits no matter who you are.
I can see that.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:44 AM EST up reply actions
Unfortunately, popularity in the stands, or in Canada, doesn’t drive the NHL’s attitudes — hype, and relevance in the American market does.
It’s easy to forget because here we’re immersed in Habsity 24/7, but down South, the Habs are simply not a team that is very much thought about. When it is at all, it’s viewed as a bubble team with a defensive system, no stars, and no great talent. In other words, irrelevant. Whereas the Penguins are a Cup Contender boasting the best player in the world and several star players. So very hyped, as much as a NHL club gets hyped in the US anyway.
This, unfortunately, is endemic in the league. Because Canadian franchises will bring in revenue and fans regardless of whatever happens to their team or how well they’re doing or what players are on it, they are largely relegated to the irrelevant corner of the NHL. Considering that this is our sport and we bring in something like 1/3 the revenue with 1/6 the teams, you’d think that the NHL would do a little more to promote good will among Canadians and the Canadian teams.
Well they will have to be on there toes if the Pens stay chippy. Crosby had 3 or 4 minors vs. the Blues earlier this week and that elbow to the head in Ottawa was a stunner. Simply from the point of view that Crosby has been injured by a head shot. What happens when Sid elevates his play by laying a full speed shoulder into an unsupecting head? Will the Gary Bettman NHL have the balls to do anything or will it need to do a poll of NHL GMs or see the Nielsen ratings to decide on a course of action?
"It's only through change we learn to grow".
Ruining the game...
It was not blindside and the only reason Letang’s head got hit like it did is because he put his head down to shoot! Is there no responsibility on the puck carrier?! He can just skate through the middle of the ice and take a shot and not have his body taken? Maybe he should have passed it instead of trying to take on 4 Habs.
Betman and crew want to turn the NHL into a Euro-league. I recently attended a Swiss pro game. It was the worst game I’ve ever seen. Sure it was high scoring, like Betman wants, but there was no passing, shot blocking, no proper checks. No heart whatsoever. Just a bunch of pretty boys with tunnel vision. If a suspension comes out of this it’ll be a disappointing turn for the worse.
We have to stop blaming the victim.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 27, 2011 12:12 PM EST up reply actions
Good thing this 9 games in 15 days stretch is over; you look at score-tied Corsi and they are regressing (Fenwick is holding up a little better). The Pleks looked worned out, plain and simple.
Eller was actually matched up to Crosby, Malkin and Neal for over 4 minutes in the 3rd period and finished +0/-1 on scoring chances and +2/-4 Corsi. Not dominating, but you look at that kind of results against what is probably one of the sickest line in the league, I think it’s good omen.
Really impressive for Eller. Looking at your scoring chances the top line was even worse than I thought.
Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire
by Andrew Berkshire on Nov 28, 2011 1:05 PM EST up reply actions

















