Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Roundtable: Which Draft Pick Is Most Likely To Bust?

Game 10 Recap: It Gets Better

Almost a week ago, Eyes on the Prize's own Chris Boyle told us it was time for some perspective. After two games in which Montreal started slow and dominated most of the last 40 minutes against big, physical teams they're supposed to lose to according to the media, it's looking like Chris's patience is paying off.

After outplaying opponents in most of their first 8 games and losing 7, the Canadiens are finally starting to reap the benefits of puck possession hockey. Most notable is the increased efficiency of Erik Cole. After struggling to produce points early on, Cole is now on a three game point streak with 2 goals and 1 assist, and probably could have doubled that if he wasn't snake-bit.

The game was remarkably even, as most games against the Bruins are. Shots were 35-30 in favour of Montreal, but the shot attempts were 61-49 in favour of Boston. Mike Cammalleri led the way for both teams with 6 shots on goal.

Montreal held the slim advantage in the hit department at 18-17, Travis Moen led the hit parade for the Habs with 3, Milan Lucic for the Bruins with 4.

Star-divide

Patrice Bergeron "scored" the first goal of the game on the powerplay for the Bruins on a fluke play at 14:05 of the first period. The only second of the game Carey Price wasn't totally focused and Tomas Plekanec won the faceoff back to his goaltender, who misplayed it and watched the puck slide into the net.

Price bounced back quickly however and kept the Habs in it as the Bruins dominated the first period. His focus and puck tracking were particularly strong tonight as the puck was bouncing all over the place in the visiting team's zone.

After merely surviving the first period, the Canadiens took it to the Bruins in the second, doubling up in shots and tying the game on a tip by Erik Cole off a Jaroslav Spacek shot at 10:27. David Desharnais set the play up with solid work in the offensive zone. His chemistry with Cole and Cammalleri is developing nicely.

The third period was the most intense hockey the Habs have played in so far this year as both teams traded chances. Montreal broke through at 10:46 when Plekanec gathered up his own rebound off of a blocked shot and slid it under a scrambling Tim Thomas.

Scoring Summary from NHL.com

Oct27_medium

In part showing possession, but also determination to win, the Canadiens blocked an insane three times more shots than the Bruins at 21-7. Spacek piled up 6 blocked shots alone. Knowing Claude Julien, he won't be pleased at the lack of sacrifice by the Bruins in their own zone.

If all that counted in hockey was puck possession, Lars Eller would be the best Montreal Canadien. His line caused the Bruins fits all night by being strong on the puck and quick to loose pucks. Once Eller learns to get his shot off quickly, the kid is going to be special.

Montreal narrowly lost the faceoff battle as they only won 49% of the draws, but newcomer Petteri Nokelainen (Nokia) managed a 64% winning rate and Plekanec was the only nature center below 50%.

The system is showing signs of rounding into form as Montreal had more takeaways (8-5) and fewer giveaways (8-12) than Boston did.

Raphael Diaz made some excellent plays tonight, including saving a clear goal and it was his best game in awhile, but I would still like to see Alexei Emelin draw in on Saturday as the Gill - Diaz pairing had a lot of trouble dealing with the heavy forechecking of Lucic and Nathan Horton.

Crazy moment of the game: P.K. Subban fell for an obvious strategy by Claude Julien to take him off the ice. After consecutive coincidental minors with Brad Marchand, the two finally fought. The beginning of the fight might end up being the low-light of Subban's career as he went for a haymaker, missed, and threw himself off his feet and onto the ice. He acquitted himself better after he got up, landing more solid punches than Marchand, and ragdolling him for awhile. If Subban knew how to throw a punch that would have been ugly, because he was clearly a lot stronger than Marchand.

Three Stars: 1) Tomas Plekanec 2) Carey Price 3) Rich Peverley

Lots of great comments tonight on the game thread: Canadiens vs Bruins coverage

The bitter and dejected side at Stanley Cup of Chowder

The Habs faceoff against the Bruins again on Saturday, this time at the Bell Centre. The Bruins have been struggling in a similar manner to the Canadiens this year, but they still look like a playoff team to me. Maybe not the Starley Cup Chanpiars though.

Hamilton Bulldogs update: Louis Leblanc stole the show in his pro debut as he assisted on both regulation goals for Hamilton and the fired home the game winner in OT. He was a +2 and fired 5 shots. I guess his shoulder is okay.

Comment 36 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Funny breakdown of the shooting stats:

CORSI: Boston 61, Montreal 49. (Shots + Missed Shots + Blocked Shots)
FENWICK: Montreal 42, Boston 40. (Shots + Missed Shots)
SHOTS: Montreal 35, Boston 30.
GOALS: Montreal 2, Boston 1.

Montreal just a bit better in controlling the play.

You should mention that Diaz most definitely saved a goal on one of those ‘blocked shots’ on a tough bounce for Price behind the net.

Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.

For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.

by Bruce Peter on Oct 27, 2011 10:47 PM EDT reply actions  

I wonder what would happen if I were to look at stats for blocked shots in the second game in two nights compared to the rest of the game. I suspect we’d find that they are more prone to sitting back and blocking shots when they’re tired.

by MathMan on Oct 27, 2011 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fixed

With the huge disparity in blocked shots, it seems like the Habs were doing exactly what stats guys says doesn’t really happen (picking their shots). But it was probably just good fortune.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 27, 2011 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just liked that when you narrowed it down to the more skillfull situations, the Canadiens looked better and better. Shoot the puck, to shooting it past the defender, to shooting it on the net, to putting the puck in the net. Nice little trend for the good guys.

Now, if we can beat the Bruins on Saturday again, then we’ll have had an OTL that should have been a regulation win, a regulation loss that should have been a win, and then three wins since Chris’ post last week.

Oh yeah, and we’re now only 2 points out of 8th.

Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.

For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.

by Bruce Peter on Oct 27, 2011 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

What are you talking about man? The season is lost.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 27, 2011 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Boston Bruins must have a line-up of Lady Byng champions. 60 minutes of hockey and only one penalty (not including the Subban – Marchant fight). A 6-1 difference in penalties, the NHL officiating is getting worse.

Great effort by the Habs. They had the better jump in the 3rd period despite playing back to back games while the Bruins were off since Saturday.

by Ashok11 on Oct 28, 2011 12:04 AM EDT reply actions  

They took 2 penalties back to back to start the second period. They could have been called for more but aside from Subban’s first penalty the officiating wasn’t too bad.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Does anyone have the .gif of Subban trying to punch Marchand and falling on his face?

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 28, 2011 12:56 AM EDT reply actions  

I sure as hell hope so.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Happy to oblige.

At least I can smile at this and try to forget everything else at the moment.

by 13_Legion on Oct 28, 2011 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Martin should put this on his iPhone, and show it before every game to Subban to show to him why he shouldn’t fight.

by MathMan on Oct 28, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

With him and gorges in the box I thought Montreal was boned.

by Stephan Cooper on Oct 28, 2011 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t imagine Martin was happy with Subban being goaded into 9 straight PIM but he didn’t seem upset after the game.

One thing that fight proved was that Subban dropping the gloves isn’t going to stop the Bruins from taking cheap shots at him as Thornton went for that extremely late hit later on.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man, that just does not stop being funny.

I laugh because I don’t want to cry I guess

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 28, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

It really looks like something that should happen in peewee.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

....of course you know.....

there is “Good and Bad” with this new found streak by the Habs. Its “Good” that they can be winning as a team without the mighty scoring prowess of Scott Gomez. The flip side of this streak means we get to see the tandem of Gautier and Martin for a longer period as the heat has certainly cooled off that pot.

"It's only through change we learn to grow".

by Canadian Jet on Oct 28, 2011 2:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Because getting rid of the best coach/Gm tandem the team has had since the early 90s would be a good idea.

I haven’t looked at GM candidates, but no sure-fire head coaching candidate comes to mind even if the organization did away with requiring the coach to speak French.

 Unless the team plays poorly for an extended stretch (rather than plays well and gets hurt by the randomness of the percentages in hockey, which is what happened with the beginning of this season) I don’t see why you would make a change unless it was for a clearly superior person.

by Roke on Oct 28, 2011 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

And unless the Habs can somehow lure Lemaire out of retirement (good luck with that!) I don’t see a coach that’s credibly superior to Martin out there. And even the switch to Lemaire would likely not be worth it.

Martin has been doing very well since 2010-2011. He’s providing the team with exactly what I thought he would: a structured system that led to dominance of 5-on-5 puck possession.

by MathMan on Oct 28, 2011 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ken Hitchcock would probably be similar, but he seems to lose the room quickly.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Doesn’t a solution to a problem require an actual solution.

The solution is not to “fire” Martin and Gauthier, the solution would be to “replace” them with improved candidates with a better idea to build and structure a better team.

The nonsense of picking two random names and linking them together is ridiculous. That is not how it would work, a GM would be chosen and he would likely pick his coach. You don’t place two guys together based on name value.

When you hire a GM, you then have to worry that he will not have an entirely different philosophy. If he does, say goodbye to all the names that you are familiar with because he will want to bring in his own guys who fit his mold with ZERO loyalty to the players he didn’t bring in.

In Toronto, it was justified because there was no talent on board and they had missed the playoffs for 5 years. In Montreal, they have played 26 playoff games over the last two seasons.

People need to get their head out of their ass and respect that Gauthier and Martin “might” know a little more about hockey than the individual who follows the puck and understands what an offside and icing are.

by Chris Boyle on Oct 28, 2011 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'll Leave The Analysis..

to you that are much wiser then me. Beating Boston, especially in their own building in front of their fans (Hey, How `Bout Dem Rhed Sawx!) is like a tonic, and I’m going to savor it until Saturday night.

Nothing Is Fool proof if you have the right fools.

by GiantsCauseway on Oct 28, 2011 7:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Absolutely. I’m also going to savour the fact that the Bruins are in last place until Saturday night, just as everyone else in the hockey world savoured us being in that spot earlier this week.

Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.

For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.

by Bruce Peter on Oct 28, 2011 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Olivier's report is out

http://enattendantlesnordiques.blogspot.com/2011/10/20125-montreal-2-boston-1.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+EnAttendantLesNordiques+%28En+attendant+les+Nordiques%29

Habs were out-chanced 21-12 overall and 18-11 at even strength. Most of that was in the first but still, I didn’t think it looked that bad.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 1:24 PM EDT reply actions  

The Canadiens were shorthanded a lot more than the Bruins were.

by Ashok11 on Oct 28, 2011 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

For sure, but that doesn’t make 18-11 at even strength look any better.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tired, on the road, they had one bad period (the first), then they outchanded 10-9 at evens.

by MathMan on Oct 28, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

And they turtled in the last 5 minutes, allowing 3 straight chances.

It’s all good.

by Olivier on Oct 28, 2011 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

For sure. I’m just surprised it ended up being such a wide margin. That first period was really bad.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Funny how the result doesn’t always match what happened.

Everybody was enraged when the Habs destroyed the Sabres and lost. Everybody is optimistic and happy that things have returned to normal after a win in which they were outchanced by a large margin.

Results are ultimately what they reward points for, but they can lack long term perspective and information.

by Chris Boyle on Oct 28, 2011 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m still shocked by how well they played against Buffalo and lost. Just shows that life isn’t fair. I thought it was the best game this edition of the Canadiens has played.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

It is quite amazing how emotion can blind us and how the end result can mask things. The 2010 playoff run brought everybody to this place of joy and adulation and should have resulted in a first round loss. The 2011 playoff run should have resulted in the 2010 result, but helped propel their biggest rival to a Stanley Cup championship.

I tried to view things without emotion and it ruined the experience, I am beginning to stumble upon a nice balance.

by Chris Boyle on Oct 28, 2011 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

During games I go for the emotional highs and lows, then afterwards I look for perspective.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t do that anymore, because while I watch the game I am viewing it through percentages now. It is weird, I have tried to go back, but I can’t go back to the emotional ball of fury that used to envelop me during games.

I get irritated when things aren’t going my way, but frustration doesn’t lead to anger for me anymore.

by Chris Boyle on Oct 28, 2011 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

The blessing, and curse, of perspective.

Try to focus on the aesthetics of the play. A badass deke is still a badass deke regardless of whether it results in a scoring chance or a goal.

by MathMan on Oct 28, 2011 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haha I’m not there yet.

Co-editor of Eyes on the Prize
Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Oct 28, 2011 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Montreal Canadiens.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Triple_low_five_small
The Bergevin Bunch – Who should be on the Canadiens’ Shortlist?
Triple_low_five_small
Anti-GM Race: The Search for the Worst Candidate
Triple_low_five_small
Habs GM Search: My Personal Shortlist
Ts_small
Vintage Hockey Jersey Scam
Predsgame_small
So yeah...
Lokomotiv_yaroslavl_logo_small
Welcome Mount Royal Soccer to SB Nation
Triple_low_five_small
The Montreal Canadiens and the Future
Picture_1_small
Other Crazy Eklund Trade Rumours
Picture_1_small
Randy Cunneyworth's Link To Homer Simpson
Picture_1_small
From Stars to Stars: A Look Back At Three Former Habs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

A Glossary of Analytical Stat Terms

For those unfamiliar with common terms on EOTP such as Fenwick, PDO or relative Corsi, here is a handy explanation.

Click here to access the glossary


Managing Editor

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small Kevin van Steendelaar

Feature Editors

A_new_eotp_logo_small Robert L

P1020029_small Andrew Berkshire

Butch-montreal__2__-_copie__4__small Francis B.

Small Chris Boyle

Lokomotiv_yaroslavl_logo_small Bruce Peter

Small Stephan Cooper

Contributing Writers

Small Olivier

Jp_small Joe Pelletier

Profile_small Melissa_Boufounos