Habs Top 25 Under 25: 10-6
Now we're really getting into the heart of the matter. Actual NHL players, top prospects, and recent acquisitions appear on the list as we look at the top 10 Montreal Canadiens under the age of 25. To view the rest of the list, here are players 25-21, 20-16, 15-11 and the introductory piece.
#10: Dustin Boyd, C, 24 years old
Acquired in the trade that sent Sergei Kostitsyn to the Nashville Predators, Boyd is a young centre who had a very strong WHL career and made an appearance for Canada at the 2006 U20 World Junior Championships, where he was teammates with current Canadiens Benoit Pouliot and Tom Pyatt, as well as former Canadiens Kyle Chipchura and Guillaume Latendresse. He was second in scoring on that team to Blake Comeau, with four goals and two assists in six games. Since turning pro, Boyd has played in 210 NHL regular season games, plus 9 playoff games, more than anyone else under 25 in the Canadiens' organization. He hasn't found his scoring touch at this level, however, topping out at 11 goals and 24 points last year with the Calgary Flames and Nashville.
Boyd is an effective defensive player, posting the lowest GA/60 minute figure on Calgary before being traded. He has good speed, and posted the best faceoff numbers of his career after being traded to Nashville. That could be nothing more than a hot streak, because his career faceoff numbers aren't very impressive. For the time being, he's penciled in on either the 3rd or 4th line out of training camp, a role he hasn't escaped so far in his career. Will he be as productive as Sergei Kostitsyn? Probably not, but considering he was a player who forced himself out of town, the Habs could've done worse in getting Boyd in return.
#9: Tom Pyatt, LW/C, 23 years old
Acquired as part of the Scott Gomez trade with the New York Rangers last summer, Pyatt surprised many observers out of training camp by making a push for a roster spot. Eventually, Pyatt forced his way into the regular lineup, a feat that is noteworthy despite the opening night presence of Georges Laraque as an everyday player. Pyatt's game is all about the details: good skating, strong backchecking, aggressive puck pursuit and getting in the passing lanes. It translates well into penalty killing, and he was taking a regular shift on the PK by season's end and into the playoffs.
Pyatt's obvious weakness: his offensive game. He recorded only 5 points in 40 NHL games last year, plus 4 points in 18 playoff games. It's unlikely he'll ever threaten for a spot in the top 6, but some kind of scoring ability is appreciated even from the final 2 lines. He'll have to focus extensively on excelling as a defensive player as a result. He's also a potential Lady Byng candidate: He's recorded only 36 PIM in 156 AHL games, and won the OHL's Most Sportsmanlike player in 2006-07 with only 18 PIMs in 58 games, to go along with 81 points. Most Byng winners are also offensive stars, so Pyatt probably has some work to do in other regards if he's to achieve that kind of accolades as a NHLer.
#8: Alexander Avtsin, RW, 19 years old
Avtsin is the true wildcard of the Habs' system. Picked 109th overall in 2009, the Habs swung for the fences and picked a 6'3", 200 lbs. winger with good hands, good speed, and a great shot. So why was he still available? Well, because he's Russian. Avtsin, however, immediately made his desire to play in North America well known, and this past summer, bought himself out of his contract with Dynamo. That freed him up to sign with the Canadiens, and he'll almost certainly begin his North American journey this fall in beautiful downtown Hamilton, Ontario. As one of the few teenagers in the AHL, he'll also have a leg up when it comes to select the Russian U20 World Junior team that will play just down the road in Niagara and Buffalo, New York.
What are the concerns about Avtsin? Well, he suffered a major wrist injury which ended his KHL rookie season after just 30 games. With his shot being such a dangerous weapon, there are concerns about how he'll recover from that setback. He's also not noted for his physical game despite his size, and has a lot of polishing up to do to develop an all-around game. Basically, at this point, he's a bit of a one-trick pony, but good coaching could help to insulate his weaker points and use his natural gifts to greater effectiveness.
#7: Max Pacioretty, LW, 21 years old
One of only five former Montreal Canadiens first round draft picks still in the system (with two of them being from the past two years), Pacioretty has had a turbulent first two years as a pro. His career path was greatly accelerated, playing high school hockey in Connecticut at 16, the USHL at 17, NCAA at 18 and turning pro by 19. Perhaps it's a matter of him needing some catching up, but his offensive game has yet to translate at the professional level. Still, there is quite a lot to like about his game. He didn't hurt the team at all last year during his 52 games, all from the start of the season, but he wasn't progressing, either. His solid skating, strong physical play, and unselfish game gave him passing grades as a third line player. Unofortunately, the Habs are expecting more from him than that.
This inability to translate his offensive game as a professional (he also only has 8 goals in 55 career AHL games) has brought up some interesting questions. Topham at Lions in Winter, who took part in this project, wonders if Pacioretty might be worth converting into a defender, given his strong skating ability, good passing, and strong understanding of the defensive game. It's a bit of a left field proposition, but we have seen players like Craig Rivet and Andrei Markov move from forward to defense with great success, so there is precedent. However, doing so would be giving up on one of the Habs more promising forward prospects, and at this point seems unnecessary.
#6: Danny Kristo, RW, 20 years old
Selected in the 2nd round of the 2008 Entry Draft, Kristo was actually the Canadiens' first selection, as they had traded their first round draft choice in the Alex Tanguay trade, a move oddly made possible by Calgary's acquisition of current Hab Mike Cammalleri earlier that day. Kristo isn't blessed with great size, but he has good staking ability and excellent puck skills. He's the kind of forward that makes defenders back off a little bit, for fear of getting beat by a quick move. Kristo earned the WCHA Rookie of the Year honours last year and played a key role as the USA U20 team won gold at the World Junior Championships in Saskatoon this past January. Kristo is actually teammates with another Canadiens prospect, Michael Cichy, at the University of North Dakota.
Kristo will return to the UND for another year, probably a smart move given the experience of Pacioretty. Kristo will be looked on as a leader at the UND as they hope to repeat as conference champions, which is a significant experience for him this coming year in light of the fact that he's no longer eligible to play at the World Juniors.
Here are some words from Rich Michalowski at Premium Scouting on Kristo:
Kristo’s stickhandling is strengthened by his quick hands. He’s got some fancy moves and can dangle with the best of them. He gets away with it now but he’ll need to not rely upon those moves as he progresses into a professional career. Kristo has great vision and offensive awareness and has the ability to get the puck to the open man. He’s also very creative with the puck and has the ability to surprise the defense with his passes. Those skills earned Kristo time manning the point on the power play. Kristo plays a responsible defensive game through good positioning, discipline and hard work in his own end.
| Rank | Player | Pos. | Age | Height | Weight | Current Team | Habs Contract? |
| 6 | Danny Kristo | RW | 20 | 5'11" | 181 lbs. | U. of North Dakota (WCHA) | No |
| 7 | Max Pacioretty | LW | 21 | 6'2" | 212 lbs. | Hamilton Bulldogs (AHL) | Yes |
| 8 | Alexander Avtsin | RW | 19 | 6'3" | 198 lbs. | Hamilton Bulldogs (AHL) | Yes |
| 9 | Tom Pyatt | LW/C | 23 | 5'11" | 181 lbs. | Montreal Canadiens (NHL) | Yes |
| 10 | Dustin Boyd | C | 24 | 6'0" | 187 lbs. | Montreal Canadiens (NHL) | Yes |
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Boyd – Brings some positive attributes to the table but you still have to wonder why two teams who are weak down the middle gave up on him. Needs to play with an edge to be truly beneficial.
Pyatt – A decent plugger who lacks scoring ability and finish. Wiil join Boyd as cheap 4th liners who can check and kill penalities. Both these guys really aren’t top notch prospects in the true sense of the word. They are secondary players but have added value in terms of their age and cap benefits.
Avtsin – Lots of hype here on a guy who has basically come out of left field. He probably needs two years in Hamilton. The big question is will he be able to make good use of his size. Hab fans need to throttle back their expectations until we really see this guy play in North America.
Pacioretty – Talk about inflated expectations. MaxPac is the prime example of how the Habs mismanaged a young player’s development. He never should have left school after his first year. Power forwards take time to develop and Pacioretty is going to need that time. The team will be a winner if one of Avtsin or Pacioretty can eventually become a top 6 forward. We won’t know that answer for at least a few more years.
Kristo – The top 25 list now starts previewing the players who might truly impact the Habs chances for a Cup somewhere down the road. Kristo is undersized but he has two attributes that really stand out – he has great wheels and terrific hockey smarts. In a perfect world he becomes the eventual replacement for Gionta.
He never should have left school after his first year.
I wonder if the same will be said about Louis LeBlanc? Not a power forward obviously, but we know how Habs critics can be. :)
Kevin van Steendelaar
http://www.yathehabsrule.com
htp://www.twitter.com/yathehabsrule
by Kevin van Steendelaar on Aug 28, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Inflated expectations
Totally agree with inflated expectations for Pacioretty. I think getting an NHLer from 22 in the draft is a relative success, and getting one who can play with smarts is a great bonus.
The problem seems to be this notion of power forward that has occupied fan fantasies since the last Cup run. In my humble opinion, it’s no good having a power forward who can’t score. In fact, I would suggest that that removes the power from the equation. I am beginning to question whether Pacioretty will ever e a scorer, and indeed if he ever should have been projected as one (especially with more seasons of evidence available).
I suggested a conversion to D because in my mind it’s not a failure, nor giving up on a player. It would e fitting a very good player into what might perhaps be the position where he could contribute most. Hockey is sometimes very inflexible in this way, but in other sports this kind of migration from one position to another is common as day. If a striker in football loses his touch, he’s not scrapped if he can be used to win balls and distribute.
The problem with MaxPac isn’t that he left school, the problem is that he was bumped up to the NHL too quickly. He could have been kept in the AHL quite usefully.
That said, it’s not like he did badly in the NHL for his age. He couldn’t score, sure, but that’s a heck of a step to take for a guy his age. It showed that he was at least ready for pro hockey, IMHO, if not quite for the NHL. It’s not his fault if people expected 20 goals at the NHL level out of him to see him as a success.
Likewise, I think people worry too much about how “rushing a player” will get him ruined forever. The problem is more that guys like Crosby or other first-overall picks have created utterly untenable expectations for rookies joining the club. Also people just plain overestimate the amount of talent around the league.
Guys who get to the NHL a bit fast can and do become productive NHLers. See Guillaume Latendresse for a recent example, as well as a guy who had an excellent 19-year-old season by any standard except Habs fans’. (Actually, Latendresse was an excellent ES scorer for his age and I wonder if it didn’t create unreasonable expectations for Pacioretty, especially once people somehow decided Lats was an useless bum, and were disappointed when MaxPac couldn’t even outscore “Fatendresse”.)
Pacioretty will be fine, he just needs to get games under his belt. He’s very inexperienced challenge wise and people forget just how young and green he is.
It’s become almost like mantra in the past few season that the Canadiens are rushing players. My take is that fans in Montreal simply don’t have enough patience or are mislead by their own heightened expectations.
Price, Guillaume and Pacioretty weren’t rushed. They became NHL’ers when they did because they showed they were ready. Price’s short AHL stint produced a Calder Cup and MVP award. Latendresse scored 16 goals as a 19 year old, something that hadn’t happened in eons in Montreal. Pacioretty was over a point per game player in NCAA in his rookie year and continued to post close to those numbers in Hamilton. Same goes for Sergei Kostitsyn with the Buldogs.
The reason all these players made the club in the first place was because they were needed at the time and outperformed others to get there. It was accident, they were not rushed – they pushed.
Where Canadiens go wrong is they call up or bring up an offensive talent, then play them with grinders on the checking line. The best way to develop these kids is to play them where they are meant to be played and allow them the mistakes they will make. They have to be managed this way, as errors are a bridge they will eventually cross no matter.
Of course, the bottom line in all of this, is that if the Canadiens are a thin team talent wise, they cannot afford the patience it takes to manage talent this way. The Habs cannot allow a player two or three years in Hamilton. If one looks at those players who have been with the Bulldogs for three years, they are no closer to being NHL regulars than they were two years ago.
I’m also not sold, and never have been, on the idea of leaving players in the US ranks. It can never be a blanket statement for one and all, as it is not every player’s answer. For David Fisher, it did little. Players of that age need to get as many competitive games under their belt as possible, and by competitive, I mean against players stronger than them.
Robert, Robert, Robert. It appears that the old dog still has to teach the young pup a few tricks:-)
The worst thing that ever happened to Carey Price was winning the Calder Cup with Hamilton. It fast tracked his development when he really should have spent another year in the AHL. It also gave him (and G&G) the sense that he was a star in the making which led to a sense that his shit didn’t stink.
Lats and MaxPac? One guy was fast tracked because he had no competition for a his job and was also viewed as a French-Canadien star in the making. MaxPac was called up too early due to injuries and has been adrift ever since. SK74 was allegedly the most NHL ready player in our system except that Hunter forgot there is more to a player’s readiness than just his on ice skill set. The Habs desperation to make the playoffs every year led to all of these players being ‘rushed’ or ‘pushed’. Maybe they would be better served if they earned their spots instead of having them handed to them because we were/are a bubble team that was/is anxious to fill spots with “promising” youngsters.
If we are a ‘thin team’, then what is to be gained by fast tracking the young prospects that can eventually take us to the next level? Is there a plan in place, and if so, are we going to adhere to it through thick and thin?
Lots to talk about my fine friend and I look forward to doing so at Hurley’s as we belt back a few Harp lagers at the Summit. BTW, kudos to you and Bruce Peter for this great series during the dog days of August. Your site continues to shine and is a must visit for all true Hab fans.
I line up with 24 cups here.
The Coppernblue actually did a few articles on how 18-21 players perform in the NHL and it seems that, apart from a few exceptions (Ovechkin and Crosby, say…), they all are basically worse than a good 750k vet. Latendresse did score 16 goals at 19 and 16 as a 20 y old (11 and 14 at ES respectively), but he was -20 and -2 in those years. Hindsight is always 20/20, but I think one can be allowed to wonder if a good 750k 3/4th liner wouldn’t have done a better job overall; the kid did bleed a lot of goals agaisnt in this first year.
I think that, as a rule of thumb, unless the guy is a thoroughbred, he should’nt be given more than a cup of coffee in the big show before he is 21. Guy Boucher insisted in an interview last year that for a young player to truly progress, he first had to dominate at a given level. And if that means he has to stay one more year as a 19 yold in junior, well, so be it. Burning one of those cheap years on a kid who gets killed agaisn’t the opposition’s 3rd line isn’t a good idea.
Also, I didn’t use thoroughbred lightly. He isn’t a beacon of stability and emotional maturity and whatnot an that skinny Slovak really outplayed him last year, but getting Price in the big show that early was probably the right call. The kid has been, overall, at the very least league-average. A league-average 40-50 games goalie on a 900k + bonuses is a very, very good deal in this league.
Steve, G & G didn’t care whether Price was a star in the making, all they cared about was that he was stopping pucks!
Being a thin team meant that the Canadiens had no other recourse but to use that players that were pushing. It wasn’t a choice. Had they elected to leave Gui in junior or Carey in the AHL, it would have meant missing the NHL playoffs – not an option!
Montreal did the right thing, and made the playoffs by the skin of their teeth three of the last four years.
No oroblem with your read on price, robert.
But I (again, hindsighht…) am absolutely sure Lats gave way more than he took in that first year and thus was probably more of a drag on the team overall than a similarly paid 30 years old player who pots 5 goals.
He was -20 on a team where four of the six top scorers were between -19 and -28. There might not have been much help for him in sight, but he cared and worked hard to improve aspects of his game, going to -2 then +4 without a drastic drop in scoring.
For some unknown reason, something did not click between him and Jacques Martin. It still pisses me off because now we are seeing the player Latendresse will become. In part, the Canadiens helped him, but he was also hindered because he was never granted a full time shot at top 6 status.
Players have to be allowed to work out their mistakes and flaws, encouraged, not threatened and punished. Montreal is making, or has made, the same mistake with Pouliot now.
Robert – I guess that’s where I disagree with most other Hab fans. I would have developed our young assets in a slow and methodical manner. If that meant filling the roster with low tier, stop-gap players then so be it. Missing the playoffs not an option? I could have lived with that for a few years. I’m not talking tanking like Chicago, LA, or St Louis, but rather having a real plan that you stick to regardless of the short term results (or pain).
I’ve been a Hab fan since the days of Harvey and Beliveau. I feel fortunate to have experienced the glory days, both with the original six and Pollock versions of the Habs. However, that just may be the problem that we face today. The glory days are long gone (closing in on 20 years). We are not the model franchise of the NHL any longer which holds an elite position at the top of the mountain. It’s a 30 team league and we have been a middle of the pack team for many seasons now. We’re living in a dream state that gives us a false sense of superiority. In our minds and hearts we are the storied franchise that has led the league for a century. Sadly, reality tells a different tale, a tale that can’t be masked by a splashy 100th anniversary celebration.
It’s a new age in the NHL and we must face the fact we are no different then the rest of the teams when it comes to trying to win the Cup. Gainey tried to build a patch quilt team over five years in order to reach the Holy Grail. After that failed, he went out on a spending spree to try and build another contender (overnight). I’ve come to grips with that but I also know that no team is ever going to win a Cup without some really solid young players who are the foundation of the team. Finding and developing those young building blocks is more important than finishing 8th every year.
There’s a hypothetical last part to your series on prospects that would be interesting to see. Let’s assume we are gearing up for a Cup run in a few years down the road. Which players on your list of 25 will be part of the team and what kind of roles will they play? I realize it’s a ‘what if’ proposition, but that’s what the whole exercise is all about. Is there enough here to help blend with the experienced players that G&G have signed?
I sure hope so because I really won’t care if we finish 7th or 8th three seasons from now. i want the Cup and I want it in the next 3-5 years. Anything else will be considered a failure in my eyes. After all, isn’t that what we’re supposed to have our eyes on:-)
Robert – This was meant to be a reply to your post above Oliver’s. I must have hit the wrong reply button.
Steve
Steve, I understand your philosophy towards building the club back up, and I’m not disagreeing that it has its valid points, but there are several things to take into consideration. I’ll state a few things, and they are from a player and ownership perspective, and not mine.
On the attempt to make the playoffs each season without fail, it likely has to do with entertainment, building and property taxes being higher in Montreal than any NHL city, and quadruple what other in Canada pay. It is a ridiculous sum of something like 8 million per year. Taking into consideration that the Habs are annually one of the top ten grossing clubs, that means they also have to pay out a revenue share to the bottom ten teams. With those two chunks taken from the organizations net income, if the playoff money weren’t there to help stabilize, then the team would be cutting costs from player payroll. That is why a significant emphasis is placed on post season income and that a tank style rebuilt is inconceivable in Montreal.
On keeping players in the minors until the time they mature, the collective bargaining agreement these days puts a hindrance on that ideal. NHL clubs essentially own prospects professionally for seven seasons. If a drafted player develops while playing in the US ranks it costs the team nothing, but the player is outside the team program. If a player is destined for Hamilton for two seasons, the difference in pay for them is significant on a two way entry level contract. Where an ETC is generally between $500,000 and $875,000, a player salary on the farm is usually between $60,000 and $65,000. This difference explains one of the reasons why players go all out to earn a callup. That option is one that must be kept open for them. Also, when a player’s free agency kicks in after seven years of contract, using two of those years at the minor level might be unadvisable. In my thinking, I’d rather have a hungry younger eager to prove himself in the bigs than a journeyman on his last legs coming cheap.
I didn’t think Gainey built a patch quilt team at all. I think it was an orgaization plan to go the prospect route, and it worked splendidly well. Folks still measure the Habs in Cups only, but the Gainey years saw four of five team make the playoffs, whereas the previous regime achieved the contrary.
Times have greatly changed as you say, and the Canadiens cannot stockpile talent as they once did, now so long ago. Gainey did his best to build the club via the draft, better than it had previously, and he accomplished that to a certain extent. The first place finish of 2008 was a manifestation of that, but ultimately it fell short. At the time, I was in complete synch with that manner of going forward, and it was how I chose to perceive what the team was building, hence this site’s name….
Just one little detail:
If I’m not mistaken, the CBA is a hindrance once the kid is 20. Before that, there is no incentive, his contract is on a sliding rule. Unless the kid can contribute in a top-6 role, I see little to no evidence telling me a teenager should be in the NHL nowadays.
But that’s just me splitting hairs.
For a year and a half at the NHL level, Price was perfectly good, and part of his game and confidence surely had to do with having won in the AHL. He came up to the Canadiens when he did because quite simply, he was the Canadiens best organization goaltending. It took him half a year to utdistance Huet.
It continuously baffles me that people forget that year and a half of growth, second guess and employ hindsight to suit their needs. When Price did falter, it was not entirely a goaltending breakdown, it had to do with his maturity levels and his handling of adversity. Hindsight cannot be used to fix this, as no one saw this coming.
What an extra year in Hamilton would have done to sidetrack this is anyone’s guess. Would he be more mature – it’s hard to determine that, or why?
What if in a second season in Hamilton, Price excelled once again, would that have brought maturity, or taught humilty? It’s impossible to gauge.
Had Price had an average season on and average team in Hamilton, would he have still been considered a top prospect?
Perhaps if that happens it slows his development curve, game growth and maturity levels. The difference in calibre also would have meant waiting an extra season to face NHL shots.
In Latendresse’s case, it was after a second NHL training camp that he made the team. His good showing in those camps were based on him playing a top six role, one the team would not give him in the bigs. It was a set up for failure, or a long drawn out apprenticeship.
Pacioretty in two half seasons of NHL has produced 25 points in 86 games – essentially a full season. That’s pretty much par for the course and not all that bad for a player out of the US ranks at his stage of development. He hust needs to be played where he should be, as a top six, and be allowed to live through his mistakes.
It is about expectation. The fanbase/media convinced themselves that Price was going to be a superstar immediately, instead of blaming themselves for making a mistake in ignoring history and the regular development curve of a goaltender, they shift their focus of blame to either the player or the management for ruining the player when he doesn’t meet their wrong assessment.
This way the continue to live in a world where they continue to be right and everybody else is a moron. Never having to question or reassess the way they watch or understand the game.
Fans base the majority of their decisions on short sighted immediate gratification. They use emotion to guide their way. In any walk of life this is a disastrous way to manage your decisions.
Price will be fine and will have a strong career regardless of where he plays.
by Chris Boyle on Aug 30, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions
“It is about expectation. The fanbase/media convinced themselves that Price was going to be a superstar immediately”
Price posting a .920 rookie season (ie. actually playing like a superstar) didn’t help matters.
What also doesn’t help matters is the media writing to the same expectations and with the same emotional short-sightedness. “Experts” are supposed to know their stuff and provide some context and temper expectations with realism. Montreal sports media, with some exceptions (read Mathias Brunet!), doesn’t. I’m still trying to figure out if they’re just that clueless or if it’s a cynical attempt to sell copy by pandering to the fanbase’s prejudice.
In any case, it means fans feel validated in their opinions because a lot of media columnists write to the same emotional, short-sighted opinions they hold.
That is the thing about the story that continues to blow my mind.
Price lived up to the hype all the way through his all-star appearance. Up until that point he was dominant through 60+ NHL games and won a playoff series.
I can understand the disappointment of him crashing back to earth, but the majority of the media/fanbase act like everything that happened before February 2010 is meaningless.
If Halak spends 2011 with a .907 SV% does that render what he did this season meaningless? It is inconsistent logic.
by Chris Boyle on Aug 30, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Logic is a shell game, shifted to suit the scenario. In Price’s case, the ways to assess his growth are constantly being readdressed, almost to fulfill the need to have a new story and be right about everything again.
The story that never goes away is that players are human beings, subject to having all the traits, faults and frailties of us mere mortals. We want to make them into heroes, but there is evidence that they are every bit the regular schmucks that we are.
Look what happens when one of our “heroes” has his pic snapped while taking a drink or two. It’s the end of the world, the player is a bum, he’s deceiving his fans…it goes on and on.
They are not allowed to be like us.
Bruce posted Jaro and Carey’s career stats on their 23rd birthdays on FromTheRink. They are remarkably similar except for the small detail of Carey having an extra 100 NHL games played.
Of course, try to tell that to the fanbase. Mind you, all the stories about Price’s lack of maturity, Philly’s unbelievable shooting run in the 07-08 playoffs, and the whole meltdown in 08-09 (that Patrick Roy gesture wasn’t too smart) have led fans to judge him on that basis rather than on whether he’s stopping the puck or not. I think a lot of the fanbase is utterly convinced he’s a headcase.
On another level, though, I do think the Carey “the golden boy who’s had everything handed to him” Price and Jaroslav “the hard-working underdog who’s being disrespected by the organization” Halak story exists for reasons that have little to do with Halak and Price. I think some media folk have taken pot shots had Gainey through Price.
But it’s Montreal, so it’s not like it’s hopeless. At the end of 06-07, Kovalev was a lazy-ass, underpeforming Russian slacker who was overpaid and dragging the team down. At the end of 07-08, he was so big a hero that one year later they had an actual demonstration to get him re-signed. There’s no way the fanbase will admit it was wrong about him, of course, but nonetheless Price only really needs to uncork one really good season for the fans to convince themselves he’s “grown up”.
What I’m really worried about is Price playing well, even excellently, and the Habs still losing because they continue to be a lousy hockey club. And I’m fairly convinced that Price will get the blame for that. This team has problems, and goaltending isn’t its biggest worry. Kind of like last year when there was so much debate about the goalies when it was about the only thing about the Habs that was definitely not the problem.

by 

















