Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Terry Collins, David Wright, And The Mets/Brewers Kerfuffle

Game Three Verdict, Habs Rapidly Gaining Ground On Non - Flying Flyers

1328_medium

In any hockey series that is yet to be concluded, trends are important and extremely telling. A playoff round is not often about where it has been, and not neccessarily about what has occurred.

A yet to be completed series is all about where it is headed.

Clues as to how a series is proceeding is found in trends evident in the most recent game.

With a solid showing and a 5-1 win Thursday night, the Canadiens are gaining precious ground on the Flyers, and judging by the Philadelphia players reactions, they know it.

Exhibit One would be the Flyers power play.

Philadelphia ruled in the series opener's 6-0 win because their man advantage was dominant and the Canadiens were ill prepared and sent reeling. The blowout loss was useful to Montreal, in regards that it gave them much to look over and observe. By Game Two, corrections were already underway. 


  M0_medium

Over the three games of the series, Montreal have not only reduced the number of power play opportunities given to the Flyers (from 6 to 4 to 3) but they have also become more adept and less panicked in countering it.

Exhibit Two involves discipline.

In Game's One and Two, Montreal got into trouble early thanks to a pair of undisciplined Scott Gomez calls that lead to Flyer goals. Playing catch up hockey on the road is always a challenge, and the Canadiens started both games behind the proverbial 8 ball.

In Game Three, the Flyers were once again gifted with a power play thanks to hockey's lamest penalty - a puck over the glass delay of game call on Ryan O'Byrne 27 seconds in. This time out the Canadiens killed it off. Buoyed perhaps by the home crowd, and likely more atuned to what the Flyers do with a man advantage, the Habs survived the penalty kill.

M1_medium

From there on, they gave the Flyers only two more powerplays, the second coming when the score was 2-0, and the third went it was 4-0.

Exhibit Three is the Canadiens scoring chances.

Everyone agrees that shots on goal can be a misleading statistic, as they do not neccessarily equate scoring chances. But what shot counts do equate, are opportunities to have created something if properly executed. It has always been my theory that every shot on goal begins as a scoring chance, and that it is either followed through with commitment, or abandoned and uncapitalized upon for a variety of reasons.

Simply stated, a shot on goal without a player going to the net does not have the same worth of a shot directed at the goal with a player in position to pounce on the rebound.

In the series so far, the Canadiens have outshot the Flyers 28 to 25, 30 to 23 and 38 to 28.

Now scoring chances aside, there are several notable trends in these bare numbers alone.

The Canadiens have contained the Flyers to between 23 and 28 shots per game, while increasing their own shot totals over three games from 28 to 38.

M2_medium

In Game Three, the Canadiens fired their highest shot totals thus far, and Michael Leighton surrendered five goals. The Flyers also managed more shots on goal in the third game, yet Jaroslav Halak and the players fortifying him reacted with their most composed resilience.

Of course, these could simply be surface takes, but the Canadiens numbers have increased because they are doing a much better job of going to the net.

And, as importantly, they are doing it as a team. Three lines scored goals for the Canadiens, including two goals from the club's third line, which has arguably been its best line going to the net.

Exhibit Four is the nasty and and helter skeltered counting of turnovers.

I'll explain a little. In Game Three, the Canadiens were credited with 7 giveaways while the Flyers were dinged with six. Now we all watched the game. Is that number not low?

I once sat with pen and paper, columns at the ready, counting turnovers during a game, and came up with close to triple the NHL counted total. What I deduced from that experience was that the league counts only direct, stick to stick giveaways that are forced within a team's defensive zone. They do not count puck dumps into neutral territory, clearings that surpass the blueline, or include times when a team is battled and beaten for puck possession after they have lost it.

M3_medium

I did not do counts for Game Three, but the Flyers gave puck possession up so often, they could have their own theme song if it continues. In fights for loose pucks, Philly were badly outplayed, and if you did not see Flyers' coach Laviolette reprimand his rearguards early on, you missed a defining series moment.

With four exhibits presented, but the case far from closed, here's the deal.

Verdict - after three games.

Where all four exhibits come into play, goes back to the notion of trends. The Canadiens are gaining ground on the Flyers as the series progresses.

Montreal has learned to counter the Flyers power play that gave Philly a big win in Game One, and enabled the Game Two Victory.

M4_medium

The more disciplined game of the Canadiens is allowing for less Flyers chances by game on the PP, forcing games to be won five on five.

The Habs have burst the Leighton bubble by creating more scoring chances, and capitalizing on them. The testament is the Game Three score.

Canadiens players forced the Flyers to make mistakes and cause turnovers. The Habs were so adept at this, Philly's best blueliner became their weakest link. It is bad news for Philly when the score in the game is 4-0 for Montreal and Chris Pronger is minus 4. Two of those minuses came with Pronger on the ice against the Canadiens third line.

Moore_g_medium

Trends....

What makes all this evidence coalesce into a trend was made possible through the Canadiens use of their greatest asset and biggest advantage over the Flyers - team speed.

Montreal are faster than the Flyers, and size won't matter if size cannot catch speed.

More scoring chances for Montreal, and more penalty calls on the Flyers are a trend.

As the series progresses and the Canadiens become more disciplined, the prominence of the Flyers power play regresses.

As the series progresses, the Canadiens are learning to waste less shots on goal with more presence heading toward the Philly net.

As the series progresses, Montreal is showing they have more strides left in their legs as games drag on. Before the end of this series, Philadelphia will not become a faster skating team than the Canadiens.

Perhaps the best news of all for the Habs is that the Flyers are already showing signs of being flustered and frustrated, even while maintaining the series lead.

This, after one loss.

Tough to gauge what Philly has left in their tank, but it comes back to telltale signs.

4613_medium 

In Game Three, the Flyers were behind by a noticeable step. Traditionally, hockey clubs wear as the long season grinds down.

More on this come 6 p.m. Saturday, when the series is deadlocked at two games apiece.

Team1_medium

Comment 14 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Congratulations on the win!

Make it a repeat on Saturday!

I went to a fight the other night and a hockey game broke out.
- Rodney Dangerfield

by stacie7 on May 21, 2010 3:35 AM EDT reply actions  

Awesome

A bold prediction, i like it! Great read as usual Robert. Hard to find further relevant points to add regarding this series really.
One thing, I must admit that Jacques Martin and his crew have really suprised me in these playoffs. More so than any of our roster players.

by habby_truth on May 21, 2010 10:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Lapierre

Great recap Robert and I like the predictions. I do hope Lapierre gets out of this series in once piece. If I was on the Flyers bench he would definitely be getting under my skin.

by Habs4life on May 21, 2010 12:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Giveaways/Takeaways

It is hard to understand what constitutes a takeaway or giveaway. In my mind a giveaway occurs only when the player with the puck makes a mistake and a takeaway occurs when gaining the puck is due to hard work. When a dump to centre ice to clear the zone or allow a line change is performed it is a designed play knowing that you are giving the other team the puck. I would not define this a giveaway and certainly not a takeaway. Now when Pronger coughed up the puck to Moore, this would be a prime example of a giveaway due to player mistake, on the other hand I would not classify this as a takeaway as the puck was a gift and posession was not gained by Moore doing anything special(right place at right time). Early in the first Philly had two excellent scoring chances where they were able to gain posession due to hard work and not due to mistakes made by any Canadiens players, these I would classify as takeaways.

by hab a good time on May 21, 2010 1:15 PM EDT reply actions  

It’s inconsistent. For some reason, there’s twice as many giveaways in Montreal and Edmonton as the rest of the league. Those stats aren’t terribly meaningful as a result.

Besides, while an individual giveaway is not a good thing, in general, a high giveaway number isn’t necessarily proof of a problem. You can’t give the puck if you don’t have it, so if you have lots of giveaways it usually means you have the puck a lot and are trying to pass it around.

It’s rather like blocked shots; we like blocked shots as individual plays, but a high blocked shot number is problematic because it means the opposing team is in your zone bombing away.

by MathMan on May 21, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

I don’t know if the league has a guideline on defining a giveaway and a takeaway. I mean you can’t score one and/or the other every time the puck possession changes teams.

by hab a good time on May 21, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Habs worked very well as units of 5 all evening long yesterday….. they were all on the same page,… no doubts the page’s central directives are different than the one we used in our victorious series against WAS and PIT but thats what we are….. a versatile and fast skating team who likes to play the game as a team.

That said its difficult to explained why we didn’t play the game as a team in our 2 previous matches in Phillys…… what it our boys following the wrong game plan or what it the boys having problem with execution ? I never understood as to why we were that far off…. specially in game 1.

by pierrelionel on May 21, 2010 5:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I always find...

The Cammalleri smiles kind of funny. As if Mike plays this for fun. That picture at the top you usually see players with a Scowl but with Mike he looks like a kid that’s having fun being found in Hide-and-Seek. Mike seems to have his own style too, after he scores goals he doesn’t raise his arms in the air but shakes his hist as a celebration. Compared to celebration’s like Ovechkin’s, Mike’s seem like a Chess Player winning a game that nearly went stalemate

by SonicMario(RW) on May 22, 2010 3:39 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm liking this post

a lot, and I hope you’re right. When I tried to make a similar argument on another board, I got the reply that the Flyers didn’t really show up last game, just like the Habs did in game 1. If that’s the case, doesn’t that negate the whole trending thing? Yeah the Habs are doing things right, but if the Flyers play again like they did in game 1 or 2, the trends ought to change rather quickly, and not necessarily for the better.

I like the frustration showing on the Flyers though, and I hope the Habs remember to keep the jets on maximum today, cause that’s just gonna cause more of the same.

by Tyg on May 22, 2010 11:46 AM EDT reply actions  

the reply that the Flyers didn’t really show up last game

Right!

Whichever Flyer fan said this, knows squat about hockey. As if the Flyers had no interest commitment or enough desire to show up for a game which if they won, they would be one win away from the Cup final.

Trust what you’ve seen, the Flyers were dominated, and it will continue in a couple of hours.

Montreal are pumped, the Flyers are nervous, questioning, and not very confident. Over three games, there is not a single area where they are improving as the series progresses.

by Robert L on May 22, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

q?

carter n lapierre are coming back. will either make a difference at the outcome?

i come in peace (and for wingdings)

by scorpio_x on May 22, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Montreal Canadiens.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Triple_low_five_small
The Bergevin Bunch – Who should be on the Canadiens’ Shortlist?
Triple_low_five_small
Anti-GM Race: The Search for the Worst Candidate
Triple_low_five_small
Habs GM Search: My Personal Shortlist
Ts_small
Vintage Hockey Jersey Scam
Predsgame_small
So yeah...
Lokomotiv_yaroslavl_logo_small
Welcome Mount Royal Soccer to SB Nation
Triple_low_five_small
The Montreal Canadiens and the Future
Picture_1_small
Other Crazy Eklund Trade Rumours
Picture_1_small
Randy Cunneyworth's Link To Homer Simpson
Picture_1_small
From Stars to Stars: A Look Back At Three Former Habs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

A Glossary of Analytical Stat Terms

For those unfamiliar with common terms on EOTP such as Fenwick, PDO or relative Corsi, here is a handy explanation.

Click here to access the glossary


Managing Editor

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small Kevin van Steendelaar

Feature Editors

A_new_eotp_logo_small Robert L

P1020029_small Andrew Berkshire

Butch-montreal__2__-_copie__4__small Francis B.

Small Chris Boyle

Lokomotiv_yaroslavl_logo_small Bruce Peter

Small Stephan Cooper

Contributing Writers

Small Olivier

Jp_small Joe Pelletier

Profile_small Melissa_Boufounos