Capitals and Canadiens - Game Three Goals Broken Down
Game Three of the Capitals / Canadiens series has provided the first one sided score of the round. In analyzing the six goals scored in the game in individual takes below, I purposely avoided the game context, in which Montreal took ownership of the first period on home ice, and seemed to lose all grip after the first score by the Capitals.
"Purposely" I state, because the errors of each goal scored against Montreal in this game should be taken on their own.
It wasn't pretty, but the Capitals may have done the Canadiens a favor in the long haul, by exposing certain glaring weaknesses on the team. After you read these individual goal breakdowns, you will see that it is quite apparent what the Canadiens need to address, not only in this series, but going forward into the future.
Reading through it, you may feel as I did, in that you are privy to an autopsy before the corpse has even reached the morgue.
Once more, I cannot emphasize enough that on many of these goals, you should pause the clips as often as possible to take stock of the positioning of players during errors.
I may eventually perform such a task for readers, via a sort of clip photo scan / telestrator marker notes in pinpointing details of mistakes, but it involves a vaste amount of time and effort to nail it right.
Goal 1: Gordon (1), assist Poti (2) On ice for Montreal: Spacek (6), Cammalleri (13), Plekenec (14), Kostitsyn (46), Hamrlik (44) (46) On ice for Washington: Poti (3), Gordon (15), Knuble (22), Morrissonn (26) Goal description: The Canadiens are on the powerplay and the puck is turned over at the Montreal blueline. Boyd Gordon, with Mike Knuble to his left, bare down on Jaroslav Spacek, who's left to himself. Gordon carries deep, his pass attempt cut by a backwards sprawling Spacek. Gordon has only a shot option, which he makes just as Spacek has slid into Halak, pushing him into his goal. While Mike Cammalleri somewhat successfully chases down Knuble, he fails to take him completely out of the crease area. Knuble gets one whack at the rebound. By this time, Hamrlik, who was caught up ice, re-enters the picture, but coasts from the top of the faceoff circle to the crease, not a forceful stride taken. In that lapse, Gordon procures a second rebound, and shuffles it past Halak. What Washington did right: After creating the turnover, Gordon and Knuble turned on the jets, spreading with options open and backing Spacek in. Both never quit on the play at the net until the puck was in. What Montreal did wrong: Spacek's slide into Halak was unfortunate, but ice is more slippery one minute into the period than it is minutes later. The two most costly mistakes were Hamrlik's - first in getting caught up ice, and then in gingerly skating back on the play, allowing Gordon all the time he needed, and all the attempts as well, to score the goal. Seeing how quickly Cammalleri blazed by Hamrlik on the play, emphasizes the point that a defenseman with no wheels left might not be the best options on the second powerplay unit. The best player for that job in my opinion (Sergei Kostitsyn) sat in the pressbox.
Goal 2: Laich (1), assists Green (1) and Fehr (1) On ice for Montreal: Metropolit (15), Bergeron (47), Darche (52), Markov (79), Pyatt (94) On ice for Washington: Morrison (9), Fehr (16), Laich (21), Green (52), Schultz (55) Goal description: A faceoff in Montreal's zone and the Canadiens fourth line is out against the Capital's third, in theory, although Laich and Fehr have been Hab killers all season. After Washington win the faceoff, a shot on goal is fired. Washington battles and wins puck control as four Montreal players seemingly have the three Capitals in check around the Canadiens' goal. Laich is allowed to take the puck behind the Canadiens net left, skate towards the right corner and pass off to Green at the point. Green, with all kinds of time and space, feeds the puck back to Laich, who's moved into the faceoff circle. He waits for a screen to set up with Fehr in front of Halak and fires a low drive that the gaolie never sees. What Washington did right: They maintained possession off the faceoff, never allowing Montreal a sniff at the puck. They moved it well to between options that the Canadiens allowed and set up an effective screen in front of Halak. What Montreal did wrong: Bergeron misses an opportunity to get the puck in the corner, then does little to hamper Laich's effort behind the net. That enables Laich to skate from behind Halak towards the right corner unimpaired. Markov arrives to late to do much about Laich just as Pyatt is slow getting to Green, arriving once the puck is passed off. Bergeron chases Laich up the boards leaving only Metropolit in the slot to deal with Fehr and Morrison.
Goal 3: Fehr (2), assists Laich (1) and Morrison (1) On ice for Montreal: Cammalleri (13), Plekenec (14), Kostitsyn (46), Bergeron (47), Markov(79) On ice for Washington: Poti (3), Morrison (9), Fehr (16), Laich (21), Carlson (74) Goal description: The play begins in the Washington end after a shot off Varlamov's mask. The rebound is fanned on by Kostitsyn and picked up by Laich, who passes to Fehr. The players criss-cross at the Canadiens blueline, and Fehr beats Bergeron easily one on one. The loose puck is picked up by Morrison, who immediately passes back to a streaking and uncovered Laich. Laich riffles a shot on net, and Fehr, unimpeded by Bergeron, skates through the crease and burries the rebound. What Montreal did wrong: Fairly simply, Bergeron played the puck on the one on one with Laich and was easily beaten. Markov reacted late to Fehr, allowing him to get behind and go straight to the net. What Washington did right: From the neutral zone in, made short passes with little risk. Laich crossed over so he'd have Bergeron to beat and not Markov. Morrison and Laich engaged in a second criss-cross to further foul up Bergeron. Fehr, without the puck, smartly headed for the net.
Goal 4: Ovechkin (2), assists Backstrom (2) and Knuble (3) On ice for Montreal: Cammalleri (13), Plekenec (14), Kostitsyn (46), Gorges (26) Gill (75) On ice for Washington: Poti (3), Ovechkin (8), Backstrom (19), Knuble (22), Carlson (74) Goal description: Gorges turns over the puck in the neutral zone and Ovechkin pounces on it like an uncaged lion. He bursts in over the Montreal blueline, where he is bodied by Gorges and loses the puck. Knuble is on it first at the right boards, and passes behind the net to Backstrom. Ovechkin has continued into the slot, with Gorges backing off him, and he is spotted quickly by Backstrom for a one-timed shot past Price. What Montreal did wrong: Four Montreal players are back on the play against three Capitals, yet Plekanec is beaten to the loose puck by Knuble, Gill is late in reacting to Backstrom, and Gorges takes his focus off Ovechkin momentarily. Each lapse combines enough blown space and time coverage to enable the three Washington forwards to set up and do what they do best. What Washington did right: The key move was made by Backstrom in finding a quick safe haven behind the goal. It gave Knuble a no risk pass option and had everyone looking the opposite way, while Ovechkin strolled in for the kill.

Goal 5: Plekanec (3), assists Cammalleri (4) and Hamrlik (1) On ice for Montreal: Cammalleri (13), Plekenec (14), Kostitsyn (46), Hamrlik (44), Bergeron (47) On ice for Washington: Poti (3), Belanger (18), Knuble (22), Carlson (74) Goal description: Hamrlik carries into the Washington zone, passing off to Cammalleri at the rights boards. Cammalleri hits a streaking Plekanec, who has crept in behind the Capital's defenders. Plekanec fires a shot on goal, and picks up his own rebound for the score. What Montreal did right: Hard to say, as every Capitals player became a pylon on the play. Montreal simply took advantage of Washington starting the period unfocused. Boudreau smartly called a timeout immediately after. What Washington did wrong: Allowed Montreal to walk right in do what they wanted.
Goal 6: Bradley (1), unassisted On ice for Montreal: Spacek (6), Cammalleri (13), Plekenec (14), Kostitsyn (46), Bergeron (47) On ice for Washington: Bradley (10), Gordon (15), Chimera (25), Green (52), Schultz (55) Goal description: Price corrals a shoot-in behind his net, and passes right to Bergeron, who hurriedly feeds it to a covered Plekanec. Bradley intercepts and fires on goal. Price saves, and Bergeron feeds the rebound up the middle a second time, and the backhander bounces off Plekanec to Bradley, who takes a few whacks at it before putting it in. What Montreal did wrong: Price had the time and option to feed the puck to Spacek rather than Bergeron, but of course, hindsight is 20/20, Bergeron boobed twice - not opting for the safety of a boards clear, then choosing to clear into a middle inhabited by Caps players the second time. The result was inevitable. What Washington did right: Like the Canadiens lone goal, this marker was a gift wrapped by Bergeron's errs. The Capitals didn't need to do a whole lot correctly to earn this one.
A Final Analysis: Winning is a team effort, and so is losing. A pair of obvious goats (Hamrlik and MAB) played a larger part in this loss than others, but these clips do not tell the entire game story. There were mistakes of every kind made in Game 3 by Montreal, but one thread of thought unollowed in my assessement of each goal scored, was that often, the Canadiens seemed to have the wrong personel on the ice to counter what Washington brought. With the last line change, this is hard to comprehend unless one knows exactly what the Canadiens coaching staff were thinking. Since I have not been able to figure that out all season long.....this is yours to chew on for now.
15 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Goal #4
Necessary-Disclosure: Caps fan.
These are my favorite types of posts. I love breaking down big plays (but I’m much more of a lurker than a poster as brevity is not my thing).
I don’t see how anyone fault Plekenec. When Georges knocks the puck off Ovie’s stick the puck is pushed almost straight at the boards and bouncing. Plekenec was racing to be in the play with Knuble on his back. The puck’s speed and directional change put it between Plekenec and Knuble and going perpendicular to both men (Puck moving East West, Skaters moving North-South). Because in this sandwich Plekenec has the puck squeak just behind his skate and Knuble has the puck in front of him, he is the only one with any chance to get there first. Plekenec has to do a 200 degree turn, reposition his stick from the other side of his body and skate farther because of the inertia of heading in towards the goal. You can see Knuble almost wipe out, and he had a far easier change of direction to cope with.
Other than that one man, in that one scenario, I think your descriptions are spot on. Thanks for the post!
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
Thanks for this – as always, a great post.
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
Great analysis…. I would disagree on the 4th goal assessment. In looking at the diagram, the mistake was that Gill and Gorges both tried to play Backstrom, and by overcommiting that way, they left Ovechkin alone in front. If Gorges goes out to Ovechkin, then Backstrom cycles the puck to Knuble in the corner to fight of Plekanec. Both Gorges and Gill are looking toward the end wall (ditto for Price) and the only person who can see Ovie is Backstrom, and well, Backstrom is a 100 point guy and Ovie is a 50 goal guy. One quick pass, and faster shot, and it’s in.
Great analysis of the Habs goal too. The Caps were lazy and it cost them. That ended immediately after that.
Let's go Caps!
great summary, as usual. seems like on the first goal, the biggest thing the habs did wrong was fail to keep the puck in the zone after poti’s clearing attempt (a typical poti PK clear, blind and weak and ripe for a pick off). i think it was kostitsyn who did not handle the puck on the half board which allowed gordon to pick up the puck with speed through the neutral zone. if kostitsyn handles that puck i think the habs have a good pp setup with the caps a bit out of position.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
A little more to Goal One
The first goal was the result of a typical penalty kill drill.
The part missing from the video excerpt is when Poti blasted the puck from behind the Caps net and two guys (Knuble and Gordon) go up the side boards to put pressure on the opposing point man.
In this case it was Roman Hamrlik, who didn’t get the boards quick enough, letting the pair slip out.
Great analysis as before, though I thought you short changed your(Mon) goal a bit. If I had to say:
What Montreal did right: They entered the zone on the PP rather unimpeded and with speed. Caught the Caps D on their heels as Cammelleri made a brillaint pass to the slot for a streaking Plekanec. Plekanec’s first shot was great in that he was moving laterally left and shot right, picking up his own rebound to bury it was attention to driving the net and following the play.
What Washington did wrong: Let the PP unit gather a rush even though the entire PK unit was there, was completely passive and made a good example of rookie defender John Carlson as he was caught playing Pylon, and even after Plekanec took the initial shot didn’t take the body or attempt to play him allowing for the rebound shot. Boyd Gordon failed to play the boards or take the pass.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
I wondered if Gorges called for a switch on Ovie once he went to Gill’s side of the ice. Tough to say, both Gill and Gorges were slow on that play, I figured there was a communication error there.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
Even so, how many guys make that shot? Ridiculous release and placement.
by Chris Boyle on Apr 21, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
The shot was out of thi world, yes. But from my experience computing scoring chances, letting any single NHL forward take a shot from there is asking for trouble. Big trouble. But I like saskhab’s take on a missed switch; Gorges rarely if ever let a guy (even less so Ovechkin) go like that and Gill gave Ovie fits all game long… But still, what a shot.
Letting a forward take a shot from anything below 20 ft is extremely dangerous statistically speaking. It is common sense that shots closer to the net will account for more goals scored.
Halak’s SV% from more than 20 feet is .970, from less than 20 feet it is .860. That is 11 goals per 100 shots. It shows that anybody shooting from there has a much greater chance to score from that spot. When you break it down even further and differentiate between skill of shooter, the percentage dives even further.
Halak’s 2010 SV% from less than 20 feet:
VS – .500 teams – .860
VS +.500 teams – .812
VS +.600 teams – .743
It is the crux of my argument in regards to Halak having an easier ride against lesser competition. The scoring rate of that spot on the ice is dramatically different when Victor Stallberg takes that shot in relation to when Ovechkin takes it.
If you replace the 10 games against the NYI/TOR/FLA with WSH/CHI/SJ/DET it would have a dramatic effect on SV% likely significantly closing the gap between Price’s .912 SV% and Halak’s .924.
Wow! Excellent analysis! As a Jasper’s Rink reader, I’m really impressed by the content for your website. Truly informative information for me as a relatively new fan of the game of hockey. Thanks.
Psst … you are a Japers’ Rink reader, btw. I don’t think Jasper has a rink or a blog.
I am in an abusive relationship. I think. I keep telling myself it will get better and just when things are seemingly better, my heart happens to get cruelly ripped out once more ... in the playoffs. I am a Caps fan. Need I say more?
Win one. Do it fourteen times.
Appreciate the work and time put into this. Should be a great game tonight. Like game three, first period is key.
I am in an abusive relationship. I think. I keep telling myself it will get better and just when things are seemingly better, my heart happens to get cruelly ripped out once more ... in the playoffs. I am a Caps fan. Need I say more?
Win one. Do it fourteen times.

by 


















