Capitals and Canadiens - Game Two Goals Broken Down
by Robert L on Apr 19, 2010 5:20 AM EDT
Email
Print
So a split is good, damn good in fact. The Habs should now have seized what broke down in this game and move forward, taking advantage of what home ice brings tonight. Here after the jump, are the 11 goals scored during the last game. The reaction to the first game's work was quite positive, so we teamed up again on this idea, hoping it wouldn't end in a 9-8 score. We shouldn't have joked about it - more could go in for Game 3! Again, it's suggested that you look at these goals as I did in breaking them down, which is to hit pause often to observe the subtle details. There were many small things I was able to catch on third and fourth glance. It's quite honestly the most accurate way to see everything you can.
As expected, the Washington Capitals came roaring back in Game 2, although for about 38 minutes, the game looked to be Montreal's walk in the park. For the Habs, it was truly a lesson that had already been learned from the fourth game of the regular season meetings.
Goal 1: Brian Gionta (1), assist Scott Gomez (1)
On ice for Montreal: Gionta (21), Marc-Andre Bergeron (47), Benoit Pouliot (57), Andrei Markov (79,) Gomez (91)
On ice for Washington: Tom Poti (3), Alexander Ovechkin (8), Nicklas Backstrom (19), Mike Knuble (22), John Carlson (74)
Goal description:
A Carlson shot from the right point produces a rebound off Halak that is kicked out to the left point. It goes untouched all the way to center ice. Caps D-men Poti and Carlson cross sides. Gomez blocks Carlson's up ice poke with his leg, pursues and claims the puck inside the Capital's blue line. As Poti approaches him, he dishes to his left to Gionta, who fires a 40 foot shot past Theodore.
What Montreal did right:
After a bloated bounce, the Canadiens players were moving their feet with Capital's players going the opposite way. It allowed virtually no neutral zone presence other than Gomez on Carlson.
What Washington did wrong:
Carlson played the puck hesitantly and tentatively in the neutral zone. After Gomez blocked the puck poke, he found himself on a 2 on 1 with Gionta.
Goal 2: Andrei Kostitsyn (1), unassisted
On ice for Montreal: Mike Cammalleri (13), Tomas Plekanec (14), Josh Gorges (26), A. Kostitsyn (46), Hal Gill (75)
On ice for Washington: Matt Bradley (10), Eric Belanger (18), Jason Chimera (25), Mike Green (52), Jeff Schultz (55)
Goal description:
Kostitsyn intercepts a Green pass on the right boards as two intented targets skate past. At full speed he moves through the neutral zone inhindered. As he hits the Capital blueline, he cuts to the middle, with Cammalleri and Plekanec at his left and right and unleashes a howitzer that beats Theodore glove side off the post.
What Montreal did right:
On the turnover, all three Canadiens forwards spread out in unison at the top of the faceoff circle, causing the Capitals defenders to back off and allow a large area to create with.
What Washington did wrong:
Two players pursued Green's intercepted pass, leaving a large neutral zone gap. The puck was bobbled by Chimera and taken by Kostitsyn. Green and Schultz were then outmanned and backed off. Schultz got out of harm's way on the Kostitsyn wrister.
Goal 3: Eric Fehr (1), assists Tomas Fleischmann (1)
On ice for Montreal: Cammalleri (13), Plekanec (14), A. Kostitsyn (46), Bergeron (47), Markov (79)
On ice for Washington: Fleischmann (14). Fehr (16), David Steckel (39), Green (52), Schultz (55)
Goal description:
Inside the Capitals zone, Markov's flip pass to A. Kostitsyn goes over his stick and directly to Tomas Fleishmann, who feeds a breaking Eric Fehr. Fehr speeds in alone from center ice and beats Halak high on the blocker side.
What Washington did right:
Aggressive puck pursuit in their own end, combined with solid positioning allowed them to capitalize on Canadiens turnover.
What Montreal did wrong:
Markov made took the worst puck option. Instead of feeding Bergeron when there was more space or shooting the up the boards, he made a high risk pass to a vulnerable and covered Kostitsyn, who appeared to not expect the feed.
Goal 4: A. Kostitsyn (2) , Mike Cammalleri (1) and Tomas Plekanec (1)
On ice for Montreal: Cammalleri (13), Tomas Plekanec (14), John Gorges (26), A. Kostitsyn (46), Gill (75)
On ice for Washington: Brendan Morrison (9), Brooks Laich (21), Knuble (22), Green (52), Schultz (55)
Goal description:
Bergeron corrals a dump into the Canadiens zone, and feeds it to A. Kostitsyn across the red line. Bergeon and Markov head to the bench, replaced by Gorges and Gill. Kostitsyn has redirected the feed to Plekanec and heads for the net untouched. Plekanec wins the puck battle with Schultz and passes to Cammalleri behind the Capitals net. Schultz pursues the puck, and Cammalleri, with no pressure applied, takes the pass on the backhand, spots Kostitsyn at the crease unattended. Kostitsyn easily taps it home past Varlamov.
What Montreal did right:
Continuously kept the puck in movement, while setting up and taking full advantage of soft play by every Capital on the ice.
What Washington did wrong:
No coverage on Kostitsyn in the neutral zone or at the net. Out of position, Schultz lost a battle with Plekanec at the boards and was too late in arriving to counter Cammalleri behind the net. Capitals defenders allowed Kostitsyn to walk right and score unchallenged.
Goal 5: A. Kostitsyn (3), Jaroslav Spacek (2) and Cammalleri (2)
On ice for Montreal: Jaroslav Spacek (6), Cammalleri (13), Plekanec (14), A. Kostitsyn (46), Markov (79)
On ice for Washington: Chimera (25), Alexander Semin (28), Green (52), Schultz (55)
Goal description:
Canadiens are on the power play. Cammalleri has the puck at the right side board and feeds Spacek at the blue line. Both Plekanec and Kostitsyn are on edge of the crease keeping Schultz and Green occupied. Specek's drive hits Schultz's stick, then redirects off Kostitsyn past Varlamov.
What Montreal did right:
Crowded the goal area, keeping the Washington contained to the net. Spacek shot on goal when uncontested by Semin.
What Washington did wrong:
No puck pressure to the side or to the point. Did a lousy job clearing the front of the goal.
Goal 6: Nicklas Backstrom (2), assists Joe Corvo (1) and Alexander Ovechkin (1)
On ice for Montreal: Gorges (26), Travis Moen (32), Dominic Moore (42), Sergei Kostitsyn (74), Gill (75)
On ice for Washington: Ovechkin (8), Backstrom (19), Knuble (22), Shaone Morrisonn ( 26), Corvo (77)
Goal description:
Canadiens players are in position inside their zone, when Corvo fires a shot that goes wide and rolls up the left boards. It is picked up by Backstrom, who had hung back, but has now moved into the circle. As he approaches with the puck, Knuble cruises to the edge of the goal crease, lightly bumping Halak and creating a screen. Gill comes into clear Knuble as Backstrom winds and fires. Halak, screened and off balance, is unable to make the save.
What Washington did right:
Backstrom beat the Canadiens to a loose puck while Knuble invaded the crease area to set up a screen. Backstrom made a heads up play in assessing the perfect time to shoot.
What Montreal did wrong:
Four Montreal players, the exception being Sergei Kostistsyn, were concentrated on the goal and slot area. Kostitsyn was slow to pressure Backstrom and opted off, and Gill slow to bar Knuble's path, played into his ploy at the goal, screening Halak.
On ice for Montreal: Spacek (6), Maxim Lapierre (40), Roman Hamrlik (44), Mathieu Darche (52), Tom Pyatt (94)
On ice for Washington: Poti (3), Ovechkin (8), Bradley (10), Backstrom (19), Carlson (74)
Goal description:
Halak's clearing attempt from behind the net found no Canadiens' target. After a Washington interception, the puck falls to Darche, who fails to skate with it, and panics with a weak backhander that is shot directly to Carlson. Ovechkin comes on replacing the player who first intercepted the puck and heads straight for the crease. Darche dives to impair Carlson's shot, but Carlson skates around the fallen player and places his drive on net. Pyatt attempts to block from too far a distance, and impairs the line of vision. Halak makes the initial save, and the rebound is pounced upon by Ovechkin, who throws a backhand shot on net and then pries and digs at it, shuffling the puck between Halak's pads.
What Washington did right:
They beat Montreal to the puck and twice intercepted clears. Smartly put Ovechkin out while maintaining possesion in the Canadiens' end. Carlson was patient with his shot as Ovechkin eluded the Montreal defensemen.
What Montreal did wrong:
Hamrlik was being beaten to the puck behind the net, forcing Halak to play it in rather hurried fashion. That clear was batted down a Capital's player who headed to the bench, Darche was also impatient with the puck. Having Ovechkin come on ice against the fourth line was inconvenient. So was Hamrlik choosing to crosscheck Bradley rather than cover Ovechkin. Spacek off to the right of Halak, was out of place to affect the play.
Goal 8: Backstrom (3), assists Ovechkin (2) and Jeff Schultz (1) On ice for Montreal: Spacek (6), Cammalleri (13), Plekanec (14), Hamrlik (44), A. Kostitsyn (46) On ice for Washington: Ovechkin (8), Backstrom (19), Knuble (22), Green (52), Schultz (55) Goal description: Ovechkin and Backstrom break into the Canadiens zone with Hamrlik backing up. Ovechkin's shot is blocked by Hamrlik, who loses track off it in his feet. The puck slides to Ovechkin in the corner as Spacek comes back on the play, shoving Knuble off while bumping Halak in the process. Backstrom streaks to the net, eluding Plekanec. Ovechkin finds him on the doorstep uncovered, and Backstrom one-times the feed past Halak. What Washington did right: Entered the Canadiens zone flying and sent two players on net. What Montreal did wrong: Hamrlik got burned looking for a loose puck rather than concentrating on Ovechkin. Plekanec allowed Backstrom to blow right by him and settle in the crease.
Goal 9: Plekanec (2), assists Cammalleri (3) and A. Kostitsyn (2)
On ice for Montreal: Cammalleri (13), Plekanec (14), Gorges (26), A. Kostitsyn (46), Gill (75)
On ice for Washington: Ovechkin (8). Backstrom (19), Knuble (22), Green (52), Schultz (55)
Goal description:
Hamrlik beats Ovechkin to the puck in the corner and feeds up to Cammalleri who make a quick poke of it to Kostitsyn. He throws a soft dribbler over the blueline, that bounces and arrives to Green. Green attempts to bat the puck forward, but it hits a streaking Plekanecs' leg. Plekanec dishes off the Cammalleri, who receives it awkwardly. Cammalleri backhands a pass to Plekanec, left unattended by Green at the crease.
What Montreal did right:
Gained momentum right out of their zone and caught several Capital's off guard. Plekanec vigourously pursued the puck at Green's feet, intercepting the clear and backing him down while passing off and continuing to the net.
What Washington did wrong:
Schultz was out of position back at the Canadiens' end, setting up the two on one, leaving Green alone. Green played the pass and momentarily left Plekanec alone.
Goal 10: Carlson (1), assists Backstrom (1) and Ovechkin (3)
On ice for Montreal: Cammalleri (13), Plekanec (14), Gorges (26), A. Kostitsyn (46), Gill (75)
On ice for Washington: Ovechkin (8), Backstrom (19), Knuble (22), Green (52), Carlson (74)
Goal description:
Cammalleri appears to slash and break Ovechkin's stick in the Capital's end and a penalty is immediately called. (See note below). The Canadiens seem caught a bit off guard at that moment. Backstrom gathers the loose puck and dashes past Plekanec at center ice at jet speed. Crossing the Montreal blueline, he drops to Carlson, who takes two strides towards the middle and whips a nasty shot past a kneeing Gorges which eludes Halak low to the glove side.
What Washington did right:
Took advantage of a situation and used every breath of speed to back an undermanned Canadiens team in on themselves. They figuratively wreaked havoc in seizing the moment.
What Montreal did wrong:
Cammalleri was caught up ice where the penalty was called, standing practically still after running up against Ovechkin instead of hurrying back. Hence Plekanec became similariliry vulnerable as Backstrom blew by. Kostitsyn was far right, out of the play itself. All this space allowed Carlson to be perfectly placed as a trailer on the play. Gorges could only manage a vain block attempt far from the shot.
Note: The slash call on Cammalleri happens fast, but with referrence to the replay and freeze frame screen shots like this one below, one can see that Cammalleri's stick never leaves the ice. As Ovechkin comes up against him, he does a bit of a jump around and they bump together. Ovechkin does a good sell with his arms raised, but his stick is broken two and a half feet up the shaft, where Cammalleri's stick remained on the ice. Them's the breaks, no pun intented!
Goal 11: Backstrom (4), Mike Knuble (2) and Poti (1)
On ice for Montreal: Gionta (21), Hamrlik (44), Bergeron (47), Pouliot (57), Gomez (91)
On ice for Washington: Poti (3), Ovechkin (8), Backstrom (19), Mike Knuble (22), Carlson (74)
Goal description:
Hamrlik feeds a pass into the neutral zone that bypasses players on both clubs and ends in the Capitals corner. Three Canadiens forwards go off on a line change and there is no presence in the Washington end as they break out and no support in place for the Montreal defence. Poti strides out with the puck, feeding Knuble at the blueline who dumps off to a streaking Backstrom at center ice. With only Gomez trailing but nowhere near, Backstrom is allowed to skate thirty feet into Montreal territory, and using a backing Hamrlik as a screen, fires one through his legs, beating Halak off the post.
What Washington did right:
Alertly jumped all over Montreal on a bad line change that left a great mid-ice void.
What Montreal did wrong:
A brutal line change on a misread dump in. Cammalleri curled left into the Washington end when the puck had been shot in the right corner. That opened great space as all of he, Plekanec and Kostitsyn headed to the bench as Washington rushed up ice. Not one forward was in place to help out the Montreal rearguards.
A Final Analysis: Notice that many of the Canadiens and Capitals goals are quite similar, apart from perhaps Backstrom's first, Ovechkin's crease goal, and the hat trick goal Kostitsyn scored with his arse. Curiously, the Capitals scored one due to an alert line change, and also burnt Montreal for the winner when they changed badly. The two clubs continue to have soft moments. Whereas Washington's errs seem more restricted to their own zone, the Canadiens, thanks in no small part to Washington's speed, seemed to breakdown more in mid ice. Four of the eleven goals were scored on shots from long range and the trend of shooting from those areas is sure to continue. A noticeable lacune on the Canadiens side for Game 2 involved the Markov / Ovechkin matchup. Montreal were able in the first to get away without matching up, but it bit them in the derriere in the second. With Montreal having the last change starting in Game 3, there should be an adjustment over the next six (plus?) periods. Both teams are causing / making similar mistakes and we can guess that whichever team corrects them best from here on could win the series. Thanks once more to Chris for his graphic contributions.
Complete game highlights
24 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Love this feature. Great work/
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
Love this feature, but I’m a bit baffled by your claims that Cammalleri didn’t actually slash Ovechkin’s stick. That screen grab does nothing for or against your argument. I haven’t seen a replay since viewing it live, but it seemed pretty obvious call. If you have video that shows Ovechkin’s stick mysteriously exploding, I’d love to see it.
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on Apr 19, 2010 9:38 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
What I see in that clip is Cammalleri’s stick never leaving the ice, from any angle and Ovechkin’s stick being broken up the shaft. There was something weird about it the first time I saw the play live, so I had a closer look. Admittedly, it’s not the clearest of angles, and Ovie himself is hiding his own stick on that view.
If there is a better look at it out, I’d be happy to take a look and eat my words.
The thing to remember about it is that the Capitals goal would have been scored in exactly the same manner had it been called or not. It wouldn’t have changed a thing, with the way backstrom flew out of there and Montreal never once touching the puck.
I basically made mention of it only because of some factions there was blame being cast at Cammy, for no good reason apparently.
Well done on the analysis of the goals. I don’t doubt Martin and his crew have done the same over the past day and a half…it’s too bad that you and i would probably be more successful at tramsitting the messages to players in the clutch.
Martin deserves tons of credit of what he’s brought to the team, but he is proving to himself, and to the rest of us, that he would be an excellent assitant coach to Guy Boucher as soon as September 2010.
Is this a common opinion among Habs fans? That Martin is better suited as an assistant? (Inferring from your post) He has the Xs and Os down, but you think he has trouble leading and/or communicating effectively?
I think it is more based on hope that we don’t lose Boucher and let’s find something to do with Martin that makes him an asset instead of a sunk cost.
The Habs are still paying Carbo and we know they likely won’t eat another long term coaching deal, so we are rationalizing a way to get rid of Martin and bring up a coach who we feel will make a difference.
Boucher is exactly what the fanbase wants. Homegrown, proven in the QMJHL and AHL and bilingual.
by Chris Boyle on Apr 19, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Interesting. Is Boucher of the level that you are afraid he’s on the brink of being poached by another team looking for a head coach? He’s not on my radar, as you might guess. And do you think that Martin gets dumped after one year of medicority for a rookie head coach? And is Martin the kind of guy who would even want to the assistant job after being in charge for so many years? It doesn’t sound like something most guys would be open to.
Martin will not take a demotion to assistant.
Boucher won the AHL coach of the year in his rookie season and we have watched most of the players that have been brought up make contributions and play within the system. We have also noticed a regression as the season progresses.
Players have also been quoted as saying they have learned more under Boucher in 3 months than they had learned in the previous 2 years.
Martin is a relic to years past and hardly inspires dreams of a Stanley Cup. Boucher’s work with the Bulldogs brings the hope that he could pull a TIppet/Burns type turnaround and provide the Canadiens with an identity, something that has been lacking since the late 90s.
by Chris Boyle on Apr 19, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, you’ve convinced me… but aside from your feelings that Boucher should have the job next year, what do you think will actually happen?
They will make the uninspired move and keep Martin.
I don’t think they will let Boucher go someplace else though. Ideally they want to create consistency through Hamilton and Montreal and would like Boucher to continue preparing the Bulldog core for Montreal and have him ascend to Montreal in a couple of years time.
Bump Martin upstairs and allow Boucher to take over a core of players that he is intimately familiar with.
by Chris Boyle on Apr 19, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
First off, congrats on this post. The analysis
First off, congrats on this post. Your graphics really complements Robert’s analysis very well. This blogs is getting better and better.
About Boucher now: I hope he stays in Hamilton for a while. Unless some other team tries to steal him, there’s no rush bringing him to Montreal. He’s done a terrific job with youngsters this year, but let’s not forget this is his first year coaching a professional team. He could use some time to mature. And his abilities to work with young players make him a perfect fir for the prospects until he’s ready to take the next step in a few seasons.
The worst case scenario is the habs offer him the coaching job too soon, he struggles for a little while to adjust to the nhl, the media start criticizing him, he leaves after a few months/seasons and goes on to become a great coach somewhere else.
http://softeuropean.wordpress.com
Very well done
Love this type of analysis. Will be back after game 3! Hope to see lots of “What Washington did right…”
Very nice work and analysis. Especially like the diagrams for each goal.
I think the big breakdown on John Carlson’s goal was that after the slashing call it looked as if several montreal players either stopped thinking it was dead immediately or to argue the call which you do note.
Also to kind of defend the refs specifically on that call, watching it in real time sure does look like a slash. There were definitely some bad calls earlier in the game, weak or otherwise, but this one at least “looked” good. Idk I just hate blaming refs when they are only human.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
It is a waste of time to blame officials.
It is mostly borne out of frustration of blowing a 4-1 and 5-4 lead.
If the Caps were crashing the crease, the Habs should have crashed into Varlamov. It’s not like the Caps defense would have stopped them from doing it, they aren’t exactly concerned with their own end. Halak was weak, but the reason the Habs had a lead was because Theodore was weak as well.
That is the 3rd time this season that the Habs have sat back and wilted under a Capitals late game attack. The refs didn’t change that game IMO, the Caps finally felt some urgency and took that game away.
The script for Montreal to win this series is a strong special teams and dominant goaltending. The goaltending didn’t hold up in Game 2 and they lost. Halak needs to play bigger or we will see Price in Game 4.
by Chris Boyle on Apr 19, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Howdy from DC
As someone new to hockey and a die hard caps fan I am simply amazed at the amount of work people put into there blog posts. I’m learning everyday and these breaks downs are amazing. I know we are “enemies” right now but deep down we are all here for the same reason …. hockey done well…. thank you much from a hockey newbie…
The Farm report is DA Bomb... read it, rec it, love it ....
by TheFuryUnleashed on Apr 19, 2010 3:17 PM EDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
