Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Gainey's Era: A look back

58398_canadiens_gainey_hockey_medium  

Bob Gainey’s reign as Montreal Canadiens’ general manager came to an abrupt end Monday afternoon, as he announced with a heavy heart that he was handing over his position to Pierre Gauthier, his assistant since 2006. Gainey’s seven-year stretch at the helm of one of the most prestigious organizations in pro sports history was marred by slightly more lows than highs, and it will be interesting to see what kind of legacy he leaves behind.  

Fortunately we can speculate all we want until that time comes, which is exactly what I plan on doing.

Reflecting on Gainey’s tenure as GM can be seen in two different ways: either you appreciate the moderate success he was able to achieve (such as the 2007-08 season) and the fruitful acquisitions he made from time to time, or you lambaste his inability to bring a 25th Stanley Cup to a city full of die-hard fans.

Star-divide

The initial reaction from the hockey world following Gainey’s resignation is that choosing the first option would most likely make you a minority.

If people refer to the 2007-08 season as an argument for Gainey’s success in Montreal, it can easily be countered with the fact that it was Montreal’s highest point total since he had taken over the team, and that although it was a great regular season it wasn't exactly the start or end of a series of 100-point seasons. With last year’s squad gaining entry into the playoffs through the backdoor and this year’s edition not likely to fare much better, that almost-mythical first place finish can now be seen as a fluke of sorts.

When a bevy of core players were ignored and unsigned on July 1st 2009, Gainey directed his attention towards new acquisitions, some more questionable than others. That brought him immediate flak from journalists and fans alike, as their stature (except for Hal Gill's) failed to convey the image of a brand new dynasty. Even though Mike Cammalleri and Brian Gionta have been consistent scorers since their arrival, players such as Scott Gomez (with bloated, long-term contracts) have been huge disappointments and will be Pierre Gauthier's problem to deal with this summer as he attempts to find enough cash to re-sign Thomas Plekanec to a long-term deal.  

For those of you out there who prefer to remember Gainey in a negative way, there are more arguments for you to choose from. From a purely professional standpoint, Gainey’s job was to bring quality players to Montreal, people who could deliver a 25th Stanley Cup. Ultimately that never came close to happening as the team never went passed the second round of the playoffs under Gainey’s guidance. In his defense Montreal can be a hard place to play for certain players who aren’t used to this amount of pressure, but the numbers would indicate that they are paid astronomical amounts of money to do one thing very well, and that’s play hockey, regardless of the place. Unfortunately the Montreal Canadiens simply don’t intimidate visiting teams like they used to, and coming to the Bell Centre these days means playing against an average team, nothing more.

Perhaps the most unsettling caveat of Gainey’s reign is his inability to acquire premier players. While the rumor mill has been in full swing since 2003, whether in February or the summer, players such as Lecavalier, Hossa, Kovalchuk, Shanahan, Jokinen and Briere were all mentioned alongside various Habs players as potential deals but Gainey failed to provide his team with a power-forward it so desperately needs.  

Last but not least, the development of young players has also been criticized as players like Matt D’Agostini and Max Pacioretty have failed to secure regular spots in the lineup. Moreover an interesting litter of draft choices throughout the years has failed to produce an above-average player, or rather someone who can win a game for his team single-handedly. Meanwhile many other teams in the league have a player like this. It just goes to show that Gainey’s 2003 promise of a "five-year rebuilding plan through the draft" did not work out as planned.

While the team still has a premier defenseman in Andrei Markov, ironically he remains one of two players that were not acquired by Gainey. Perhaps we all need to look at the state of the Maple Leafs to make us feel a little better, and to remind ourselves that we could have had worse than Bob Gainey as GM.

Also read: The Bob Gainey Regime - Transaction of the Gainey Era 2003-2010

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good look back on the era for sure.

Oddly enough, I think that Gainey’s biggest mistake in retrospect was letting Mark Streit walk. Popular wisdom suggests that he could have been signed for a significant raise on what he had been making, but for less than what the Islanders gave him. Instead, he moved draft picks to upgrade the forward position (Tanguay, Lang). Both had decent years for the Habs, but were gone after 1 year. Streit probably could have been signed for the money we gave Spacek this past summer.

Having good puck moving defenseman in this post-lockout era is huge. We’re still in short supply of those at the NHL level.

His best move? Trading Jose Theodore. Imagine if he had trusted him to rebound the next year. He wouldn’t have come off the books until after the 2008 season.

Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.

by saskhab on Feb 10, 2010 10:44 AM EST reply actions  

Gainey did a lot of questionable things perhaps, but first and foremost, he was a great representative of the organization. I find it very unsettling to think that if someone like himself could not attract the premier talent, particularly local talent, then there is little hope in Gauthier or anyone else who fits the linguistic priorities being able to do that.

by nyhabsfan on Feb 10, 2010 10:45 AM EST reply actions  

I think people underestimate how hard it is to draft a premiere player, and how much harder it is to sway one to sign with your team.

Bob did what he said he would (leaving last summer’s acquisitions until later on here…). He went after potential free agents when available, and when he believed they fit a role on the team. He didn’t throw money at every player available. Last summer was the exception, but in all fairness, after witnessing last year’s debacle, can you blame him for cleaning house? And for not unfairly compromising young players by forcing them into the vacated roles? Aside from the Gomez deal, I don’t hear too many complaints about the new guys, either.

Gainey also acquired a young Josh Gorges in exchange for a valiant, but aging Craig Rivet. He essentially replaced Rivet with Hamrlik. Ryder was let go, but did anyone, then or now, want to pay him 4mil. per? Don’t forget the state this team was in when he took over. It wasn’t demolished, but the cupboard was pretty empty.

Finally, drafting. Its always a bit of a crapshoot. There’s no crystal ball. However, Gainey did draft the Kostitsyns, Komisarek, Higgins, Ryder, MaxPac, Subban, Price, Halak, Lapierre, Leblanc and Latendresse. Not bad. Not bad at all. It didn’t work out the way we would’ve ideally liked, but there are many teams out there who would take our lot over theirs. Maybe a player down the road will pan out, as nothing has been settled yet.

by westcoasthabs on Feb 12, 2010 2:55 AM EST up reply actions  

The only concern I have is whether Pierre Boivin and others in upper management will stick in their nose and tell Gauthier what to do in hockey dealings as they did to Bob in the past. How dare a GM has to be bilingual according to Boivin? This tells me that the organization is quite content having Gauthier as our sub par GM for at least 3 seasons and their goal of a Cp ion Montreal is not in their plans but selling out the Bell Centre every game night is only acceptable.
Sadly, we are turning into the Leafs, this organization of ours is just after the revenue for the greedy owners and investors and we will not see a Stanley Cup in Montreal for at least another 10 years.
 I said it here and you heard it here first!

by RetroMikey on Feb 10, 2010 3:28 PM EST reply actions  

Boivin never did. Only you believe so Mike. For the millionth time, Boivin has no hockey acumen whatsoever in his background that lends his opinion any worth and would allow him counsel his hockey men. As president of the team he sits in on meetings and gives his thoughts from an organization standpoint in regards to marketing and bottom line. Those thoughts have no weight on team direction.

by Robert L on Feb 10, 2010 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Seeing as how Boivin didn’t interfere with Gainey’s affairs I highly doubt he’d pull a 180 and interfere in Gauthier’s. I have to agree with saskhab in saying that I was extremely disappointed to see Streit leave, especially after the career-year he enjoyed in Montreal and seeing how well he and Markov would compliment each other on the power play. Bergeron is an important asset but simply not as dangerous offensively as Streit is.

by myles82 on Feb 10, 2010 3:47 PM EST reply actions  

I don’t believe that Boivin has or will interfere in true hockey decisions. However, I really question his statement on the fans being 2/3 to 3/4 francophonic. There are far too many Habs fans all over the rest of the world for that to be possible.
I also think that he has made a huge mistake in emphasizing the need for a hockey GM to be bilingual, and being “sensitive to the situation” in the province. Essentially, it is a warning that any competent non-francophone/bilingual GMs need not apply.
A hockey GM should be just that, and while being bilingual is a great asset, and a good public speaker is nice for the media, fans are more interested in a quality product on the ice. It shows the fans the most respect by simply getting the best players and managers. Period. It is Boivin’s job to be the public speaker, but not to complicate or politicize hockey or the organization.
I am not sure if Sam Pollock was bilingual. Either way, no one remembers him for the great public speaking he did.

by nyhabsfan on Feb 10, 2010 5:18 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Montreal Canadiens.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small
Recalling Elizabeth II's Habs Visit
2987845178_b30976f7f9_small
Habs Tickets Prices Dropping
P1020029_small
Habs EOTP on Marek vs. Wyshynski
P1020029_small
Get To Know Patrick Holland
P1020029_small
Dire News
27337_519236873_5263_n_small
A Christmas Gift
Stanley_cup_wallpaper_small
Coming to see NJ vs MTL, is there Open Hockey?
Imag0446_small
Good time a 'Skate with Canadiens'
Small
Advice for a southern hockey fans first habs game?
Small
One of my heroes.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Logo-max-pacioretty-foundation_medium


Managers

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small Kevin van Steendelaar

Editors

A_new_eotp_logo_small Robert L

P1020029_small Andrew Berkshire

Butch-montreal__2__-_copie__4__small Francis B.

Small Chris Boyle

Lokomotiv_yaroslavl_logo_small Bruce Peter

Contributing Writers

Small Olivier

Jp_small Joe Pelletier

Small Stephan Cooper

Profile_small Melissa_Boufounos