Four Questions on the Habs From Devil's Site In Lou We Trust
A very in depth pre-game look at tonight's Habs / Devils tilt is available at In Lou We Trust. John Fischer fired some questions here at In Bob We Bust yesterday, and here's how all that went down.
1. Montreal just defeated the Florida Panthers 2-0 in a game where both teams threw everything at the goaltenders and Jaroslav Halak rose above Tomas Vokoun to get the shutout win. While the win was nice, what do you see in that game that Montreal needs to improve upon for tonight's game against New Jersey?
Truth be told, the Canadiens can still improve in just about every facet that doesn't involve special teams and goaltending. They surely will not penetrate Jersey's defense as they were able to against the Panthers. Montreal will not fire 39 shots on Marty in this lifetime!
Against the Devils, the impossible mission always involves creating outmanned advantages and beating them to the puck in all three zones. Not gonna happen, but the effort to do so has to be consistent in order for the Canadiens to capitalize on the few chances they may create. Last time in Jersey, they learned that a 1-0 lead is simply not enough. If the Habs work hard enough to gain a lead at any point in the game, they'd better be disciplined to hold onto it.
2. Incidentally, with the win over Florida, Montreal is now up to a mediocre 10-10-2 home record this season. They've had more wins on the road. Is this record just coincidental to the team's play, or is there more to Montreal's tepid home record this season?
That may just be that they've been served a weaker road opponent over the scheds first half. That and the fact that there is no hometown crowd to get fancy in front of.
An honest assessment would be that without Markov and Gionta for a chunk, Montreal is pretty much the .500 hockey club their record says they are.
3. Brian Gionta finally recovered from his broken foot and will play against the Devils for the first time since signing with Montreal. I see that since his return, he has scored 2 goals and 3 assists. Very nice. Clearly, he's producing, but Devils fans are interested to see how does he fit in Montreal now?
Gionta's been dynamite since Day 1. Fitting in with Montreal has been smoothened by his reunion with Gomez, who incidentally, is shipwrecked without him. Gionta's return to the lineup has coincided with the acquisition of Benoit Pouliot, and thanks to his joining an already cemented duo, is finally showing why he was a fourth overall pick in 2005.
In many opinions, up until that foot injury, Gionta was considered the Canadiens best and most consistent performer. If you can imagine in Montreal, hardly a negative word has been uttered about the guy.
4. One of the more surprising stats regarding the Canadiens is that while they tied for 9th in the least amount of PIM/game with 12.0, they are third in the NHL in having the most minors with 214. Moreover, some Montreal players took some incredibly stupid penalties against the Devils back on December 16. What has the team been doing to try an improve their on-ice discipline? Are they even doing anything to address this issue?
Well, all you could say is that they are aware of it, but improvements rarely last more than one game. It's a bit of a viscious circle with the Canadiens. It starts with the high shot totals when they are not aggressive enough on the puck. Correcting that, invariably brings on the lack of discipline. If there is a penalty box parade then guess what?....up go the shot totals.
The revolving issue with this Montreal team is that it is not built to sustain puck battles over three periods. Up front, the skilled and feisty lack size, and competing with an edge often brings about the lackadaisical efforts that result in the lazy penalties. The tell tale stat is the number of calls that fall into the hooking, holding and tripping categories. The Canadiens are taking these penalties on the chase, from behind, and as a result of not taking the extra step at the right time to gain the proper angle on opponents. What gratingly nags, is the notion that you cannot teach a group what it is essentially unable to do physically. That in a breath is the Canadiens story over 48 games.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I see you blaming the roster makeup, a common complaint, but I strongly feel that this is misplacing blame, as I don’t think any roster makeup could win with the Habs’ current strategic approach. I personally think that the problem with aggressiveness and drawing penalties is not with the roster, who was plainly better at this earlier in the season, it is with the agonizingly stupid and staggeringly ineffective passive system apparently favored by Jacques Martin. The problem of the Habs is not that they cannot sustain puck possession, it’s that their strategy does not call on them to try.
I honestly feel that the Habs’ size at forward is not an issue for the simple reason that their passive approach and absent transition game prevents them from getting into a position where it could become an issue. They spend so much time in the defensive zone because of their atrocious transition scheme and their willingness to let opponents hold the puck at will that they don’t get enough opportunities to hold the puck in the offensive zone. Only if they improve their strategic approach so that offensive zone time is actually possible will forward size have a chance to become an issue and, frankly, my suspiscion is that it will turn out that it won’t be. The forwards may be small, but as we’ve seen earlier in the season they are actually superior on takeaways and excellent puck-possession guys, especially Gomez who sees some of his best skills go to waste because of the coach’s horrific passive approach.
The problem is with the coach’s so-called “puck-possesion” style which actually is more of a puck-concession style, but it’s become clear to me after Martin’s comments that puck possession to him is a fashionable buzzword, not a philosophy. The Habs have the roster to be much better than this but the system is singularly ill-suited to their skills — really, it’s ill-suited to any team’s skill as it basically involves trying to lose games by one goal and hope the goaltender saves them from the ceaseless flurry of low-percentage chances the system is designed to allow.
Geez MathMan, can you possibly condense your comments into a simple sentence?
We will not make the playoffs this season, there! Isn’t that simple?
We will win the Cup only with a mature Carey Price in the nets
The scary thing, too, is that despite the lamentable tactical approach, the roster is strong and skilled enough, especially the goaltenders, that they just might manage to slip into the playoffs in a weak Eastern conference. That’s a credit to the players, certainly, but that roster ought to be capable of better.

by 















