Losing To The Blues, Gainey's Cap Blues
I can't win it seems, like the team I cover in a sense.
I'll explain.
On Sunday, the Canadiens play the Rangers and get trashed, badly. A busy late afternoon with a long to-do list ends with a daughter's hockey practice from 7 to 8 p.m. Arriving home, I'm feeling a touch under the weather, but my team is leading the Rangers 2-0. All's well in my world momentarily, until the Habs come undone like a wheatie that hit the fan. A bummer of a desolate loss, and I'm feeling all the worse for missing the one period the Habs play well. I watch the Express version on RDS, to catch up on the missed period.
Wednesday night, a similar but reversed scenario. Things to do again compromise viewing the first chunk of the game. Knowing the Canadiens have called up Mathieu Darche from Hamilton and plan to dress Ryan O' Byrne at forward, I don't altogether mind that I will miss this classic in the making. Arriving home, my television has been kidnapped by fans of American Idol in my family and I have two phone calls to return. As I catch up, I see on NHL.com that it is 3-1 Blues. Finally I turn on the tube just as Benoit Pouliot pots his second on the night. Them Cammalleri ties it. Nice twist, I am thinking. Last game I missed the goal scoring and tonight I arrived on time for it. Sensing a win in my bones, the Habs head to OT and Andy McDonald ends it three minutes in with a perfect snap where the cross meets bar.
Canadiens can't win anymore. Same here.
It's starting to feel, for me at least, like it's 1999 all over again. Contrary to the Prince hit "1999", it don't feel like much of a party.
On l' Antichambre, which I can't watch anymore either cause it makes me want to kill, one panelist mentions Gainey and mathematics. I'm stuck on that thought.
Gainey. The Habs glory days of the '70's. His Dallas team in 1999. Numbers. Stuff that adds up and stuff that don't.
Earlier in the day, I came very close to buying a Guillaume Latendresse jigsaw puzzle at Jean Coutu. Bittersweet is an almost perfect word, especially if Pouliot is your favorite Hab these days. This summer, if he keeps it up, he should be one of many on this team earning a raise while the cap craps out.
I really am liking many of the new Habs Gainey brought last July. Even Gomez now. I also recognize that it is an ill fitting team I cheer for - as dyslexic on ice as that 1999 edition that perfected floundering.
At the end of a day that's left my mind tired, my thoughts are on Gainey, what he's to do to fix this mix of a mess, and what experiences he will draw upon from a wealthy past to employ going forward.
Two notions struck me quickly. The first is that it is easy to point to all that is wrong and much more difficult to correct it. Truth be told, I haven't a clue where to start, and as a Hab supporter I almost feel guilt and shame in looking ahead to the 2010 draft. Notion number two is that Gainey has the present to draw upon, his 1999 Cup win in Dallas back when a cap was something a player put on his head after winning the Cup, and all those loaded to bustin' teams Gainey played for in the '70's.
Now maybe there is a point to make with what follows, and maybe it will fly over some heads, but I though that it may be somewhat thought provoking to take the 1979 Canadiens and time travel the club to fit under today's salary cap system.
Undoubtably, it's a goofy excercise in silliness, but it is just to point out possibly that for whatever that bank of experience means for Gainey in this day, it likely cannot be tapped into to fix current dilemas.
So, for whatever it's worth....
I hope to read your thoughts after you've drawn your own conclusions.
For argument's sake, the '79 lineup will be limited to 20 starters and one spare. I'll annoint them salaries that compare to today's going rates based on their achievements. Yes, you can see where this one's headed from miles away. There will be a rough tally at the bottom line with no further comment.
Guy Lafleur ($12,000,000) - Multiple award winner, all-star and six time 50 goal scorer gets nothing less than Ovechkin money in this day.
Ken Dryden ($8,000,000) - Winningest goalie of his time, durable, dependable and consistent. Excellent season to Cup wins ratio.
Larry Robinson ($7,000,000) - Norris and Smythe Trophy winner, point per game rearguard, arguably the best at his position.
Jacques Lemaire ($6,500,000) - The games best and most decorated two-way centre, key to the team's top line. At times underrated but tremendously intuitive.
Steve Shutt ($5,500,000) - Perennial 45 to 50 goal threat. One dimensional but indispensible.
Guy Lapointe ($5,400,000) - A power play and point specialist capable of solid numbers. On a slight decline, but still a dangerous weapon consistently in the 60 to 70 point range.
Serge Savard ($5,250,000) - Seen as taking a discount. The team's steadiest defender is equally adept and composed on offensive. Captain material.
Yvan Cournoyer ($5,000,000) - Past his prime and injured most of the the year. Salary based on a long list of accolades and exploits.
Bob Gainey ($4,500,000) - The game's premier defensive forward, chips in with decent offensive output while shutting down the best of the best. A quiet leader and a steadying influential presence.
Pierre Larouche ($4,000,000) - 50 goal scorer acquired from Pittsburgh. Unlimited potential, but so far disappointing results.
Mario Tremblay ($3,200,000) - Grit and determination personified. Not a top line performer but offers the team incredible depth on wing. 30 goals from third line, a special and consistent commodity.
Doug Jarvis ($2,100,000) - The faceoff guru and NHL Ironman. Combines with several variable forward options in snuffing out opposing team's best.
Yvon Lambert ($2,000,000) - Somewhat one dimensional veteran with size and skill in the crease area. Has posted several 20 and 30 goal season. Both a dependable but expendable element.
Doug Risebrough ($1,900,000) - Grinding two way centerman with more than respectable offensive output. Nearing UFA status.
Rejean Houle ($1,900,000) - Dependable, skilled and dedicated veteran employed in several roles. Depth of a high calibre with consistent results.
Pierre Mondou ($1,700,000) - A bright prospect for the future at the 70 point plateau. Young and om first contract extension.
Michel Larocque ($1,500,000) - Longtime backup with numbers that rival a team's starting goalie. Indispensible as a secondary element, but often the subject of trade rumours.
Mark Napier ($950,000) - Bright young talent, offensively gifted with 40 to 50 goal potential. Salary includes several bonuses from signing in the WHA at 18.
Rod Langway ($850,000) - Promising young defenseman on entry level contract. Possibly the heir to Savard. Could be a future Norris winner.
Brian Engblom ($800,000) - Unherald, but gifted. Upside not yet known, but is surely in team's future plans.
Rick Chartraw ($750,000) - A depth blueliner, utility forward and team's resident tough guy. A UFA at season's end expecting a raise for length of service. As good as gone.
There you have it. Twenty-one players with a present day cap hit of $77,800,000 M.
Before the top two lines are filled out, the team is over the ceiling. The entire lineup, through the roof.
Gainey will never build this team, of course, but it is where this good man comes from.
My apologies to players from the day who may read this and weep!
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Robert, we are all deeply disappointed and upset with the Habs performance. However, thank you for your everyday work at this website. It is full of great resources and interesting stuff for every Habs fan. I admire you have energy and motivation to do research and come up with ideas for a new article all the time, especially after tough losses..
Keep up the great work!
Robert,
I see all of what you mention as being your perspective and I respect it. I do see elements of what is and what could be. I see the issues in MTL currently being (as much of last year was) a team on the brink of being changed every so often and constant discussion about certain players leaving. This all puts a damper on the guy who is to lead the team but also keeps the guy supposedly on the block in limbo. Price, the heir-apparent, hasn’t been steady in some time, and looking at the goals scored on him last night, his concentration isn’t there. Where was he playing on the OT goal? 4 feet left of where he should have been.
Halak, and his play, speaks volumes about what he is prepared to do to get the starting gig. I wish that the Habs would put a muzzle on the press and let the players play. A 1a/1b scenario is what they need to put into place and let the season ride out. Keeping the guys in limbo only makes their minds wander and prevents any form of consistency.
As for O’Byrne… O’Burned-again.. being a forward… I have no idea who is putting forth the line-up but I didn’t think Barnum and Bailey’s had a stake in the Habs?
But despite all of the above, I do feel that the elements of this team – should the goaltending situation be settled down a little – remind me of the unexpected 93 team. Less talented than this group, a better goaltender, and coach?? I donno, it feels a little like a second half surge coming on. The Olympic break will bring about a new found energy, and despite a not to stellar first half, our Habs will be playoff bound. (Though if we end up trading away Halak, and obtaining another Top 6 forward, the continual spiral of inconsistent line-ups will continue and we won’t be playoff bound).
by Cruisin4aBruisin on Jan 21, 2010 8:43 AM EST reply actions
There’s about five issues more pressing in my eyes than goaltending. It’s too easy to focus on the last line of defense. Nobody’s talking about Markov being caught up ice on the winning goal then scuttling back and being terribly positioned on the winner.
Until the team has either the players to play the coaches system (?) or a system and coaching that better suits it, this is how games will look.
Markov has most definitely hit a bit of a wall the past week or so. It happens when guys haven’t played much are all of a sudden back into regular shifts. He still needs to get caught up, despite his initial surge when he returned.
Of course, the reason he was caught up ice is because he almost won the game for the team. I’ll take that risk, especially against a WC team.
For what it’s worth, he was caught up ice on the Parise OT winner vs. New Jersey, too.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
The goaltending complaining is white noise to me right now. It lacks imagination and analysis. The Canadiens were outworked on the puck all night, the Blues had 40-50 second spurts where they skated circles around the Canadiens zone all night. Playing a hard 20 minutes and earning a point is a bonus, but it masked the overall effort and leaves fans the opportunity to once again dump it on the feet of the last line of defense.
I agree with Saskhab. Markov’s pinch is what makes him great. Unfortunately, it didn’t work this time.

by 










