Lang Could Offer Possibilities And Solutions For Habs
It was but an unconfirmed foot note in the slow season of summer hockey news, but a few eyebrows were raised last week when the idea was floated that center Robert Lang may be offered a tryout come training camp.
For the moment, such a notion remains uncomfirmed.
Lang was something to remember in a forgettable 2008-09 Canadiens season, racking up 39 points in 50 games when his season was cut short with an achilles tendon slash in a nightmare game against the Bruins on February 1.
At the time, Lang was the club's leading goal and point getter, a surprising thought when one remembers he was brought on board as the team's Plan B to a dithering Mats Sundin.
Lang was thrilled to be a Montreal Canadien and it showed. A few games before his season was terminated, he had registered a unique hat trick of sorts, scoring his three goals four different ways - even strength, PP, and into an empty net on a 6 on 4 PK.
With Lang in the lineup, the Canadiens were 28-16-6. Without, they were a worse than dismal 13-14-5. Reasonable voices were suggesting that Lang and not Alex Kovalev should have represented the Canadiens at the All Star Game.
Yup, he had been that good!
While GM Bob Gainey was busy blowing up the blueprint this summer, Lang became pretty much an afterthought in the Habs scheme of things. Fans and curious onlookers of the team have been left with nothing but unanswered questions in regards to the Canadiens lineup, seeing as there is an unprecedented number of new faces on board.
The most positive impressions on this new group of could-be Habs imposters suggests that the club has gotten both faster and younger. It is also highly likely that it will be better coached.
Where Lang could fit in if he makes the club, is in addressing the need for size down the middle and leadership on the club. Of the question marks and voids on the team, Lang's addition would cover both needs if he is fit to make the team.
It's worth a shot, and no one can state he has not earned it. In a turbulant sea of indiscipline last season, Lang's was a steadying influence. It may or may not be coincidental that the wheels left the wagon after he'd left the scene.
If Lang is healthy enough to make a contribution, several factors would benefit.
At center, the one sure thing will be that newcomer Scott Gomez will be front and center, and handed every opportunity to succeed. In the past two seasons, Gomez's numbers have been on a slow decline, so one is tempted to wonder how much of a sure thing he can be.
Tomas Plekanec, whose play can range from crafty to absent minded, is coming off a miserable season he must surely rebound from. There is no doubt that Plekanec is capable of much better than he offered last season. Plekanec is being paid a hefty $2.75M an is facing down unrestricted free agency at season's end. He's most likely to be moved if he fails to live up early on.
Maxim Lapierre had a breakout season in 2008-09, winning the Jacques Beauchamps trophy as he upped his game. There is no knowing whether his play could slip back some, or has plateaued. It is unlikely that the club imagines him in a top line role, behind Gomez, yet he remains the team's most physical centerman.
Glen Metropolit is a prototypical fourth line center who understands his role and executes his work effectively. He will be challenged by Kyle Chipchura and Ben Maxwell at training camp, with the likelyhood being Chipchura will make the club as a fifth pivot, or pass through waivers on the way to Hamilton.
Down the middle, there could be a legitimate concern that there is little to push and challenge these four for pecking order, something the addition of Lang would change in a hurry.
As he demonstrated last season, Lang is capable of shuffling between the top three lines at ease. He played 30 games less than Gomez, and at age 38, he also out scored him. He would make an ideal mentor for Plekenec, who may still be in need of mentoring. Lang's addition could also allow Lapierre to continue to develop at his own pace, without his sights set too heartily on an offensive role should Plekanec falter.
Salary wise, Lang is a unique fit as well. As a player over 35 on a one year deal, he is eligible for league paid - not team paid - bonuses. If he were to sign at a smart risk rate of a clean million, the Canadiens would still be left with required wiggle room for injuries, considering all the replacement parts come cheaper.
Finally, and this would be interesting, Lang might make an ideal captain in what is clearly a leadership vacuum. having him hold the position for a season would make sense while other leaders emerge.
It's surely a wild thought that a potential training camp walk on could offer so much to a team, nevermind being named it's captain, but Lang's case for such considerations was made last season, as the Habs best player for the first 50 games.
There's little to lose in such a scenario, lots to potentially gain.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree
Lang deserves to be invited at training camp. Robert, I like your article. I am writing from Korea so I don’t get to see too much in terms of intelligent canadien camaderie. keep up the great work.
PS I even saw your Canadiens wish list write up on Puck Daddy!!!
Lang
Robert, just a few days ago I mentioned to my son that Lang should be brought back into the fold. Except for the questions about how well his achilles tendon has healed, I don’t see any downsides. His smiling face and cheerful execution of his assignments was always worth the price of admission. Captain? Dunno, but I am sure that Bertrand Raymond would have a say…that he is not Francophone.
Lang
I will be very disappointed if we don’t see Lang at training camp… For the last few weeks I have been hoping that he wouldn’t sign elsewhere and would get another trial with Montreal, I think it could be pivotal for the team.
league paid bonuses??
would you mind elaborating on that?
There are two types of player bonuses. The most common are those given to players on entry level contracts during the first three years of that deal. Those are paid for and negotiated by the team. The other bonuses are for players 35 years of age or older, who have signed a one year contract. Such players must have played a minimum of 400 NHL games AND have spend 100 days on the injured reserve list during the season of their last contract.
Their bonuses involve hitting points and games played targets, and those are standard amounts paid by the league.
You can read more at this link or read the actual CBA sections 50.2 and 50.5 for further clarification.
“Their bonuses involve hitting points and games played targets, and those are standard amounts paid by the league.” First of all, I went to the CBA (50.2 & 50.5) and I’m never going there again! Further clarification? I believe our Robert L is a hidden lawyer who works in secret for Gary Bettman.
What does standard amounts paid by the league mean? You are implying that we don’t have to pay them or they do not count against the cap? What exactly are the cap benefits of siging an old guy like Lang who was injured last year?
As well, the fact that you floated the idea of Lang as captain (even if it’s a stop gap measure) speaks volumes about the lack of viable candidates for the job. Most of the posters on HI/O figure we have dozens of leaders coming out of our ears but I just don’t see it.
Long story short, the team only pays the base salary.
I think this ruling was primarily a mechanism set up by the league in order to keep options open for teams signing older players. It helps negate the risk factors, and the team is only on the hook for the salary agreed to.
The standard rate differ by position, but I believe they all contain games played clauses that are not easy to meet. It’s something like 70 and 40 for players and goalies.
As per the captain thing, I think the fact that Lang is a plausible option, screams loudly to the notion that there is a large void. To me, markov is still the only clear choice, but it is far, far away from consensus.
no C, just have A'
I think the habs should pass on someone donning the C for the time. I think it would be better for the team to got with 3 A’s and let the “cream” rise to the top, as they say. Yes, the team has tradition to up hold, however, its a new era and I think not having a C will give each member of the team something to work for and its a form of rebuilding that won’t send the fans into a frenzy or bring shame to Beliveau.
Re-signing Lang would be great news!
There’s no reason why eyebrows should be raised over him coming in for a tryout. If he’s recovered from his injury, and the Habs can sign him, they should do so!
There’s no reason for management or the team to rush into designating a captain. They need to establish a core of leadership first and worry about that later.
Would Lang make a good captain? Perhaps, but in this case, since by salary, Gomez is the central figure with by far the most pressure to deal with, if he can overcome that, he will most likely be the most sensible choice for the “C”. Lang would certainly make a great assistant captain, though.
woah… I forgot Markov! Yeah, he’s probably the most fitting choice for captain if/when that is decided, but as you say, it should be up to the players to decide that.
It's all up to the players....
…and hopefully there is a sense of history in the voting of this next captain.
Whatever the solution, I hope it is not an embarrassing one.
A newly acquired player has not been named captain of the Canadiens since the 1930’s, when the leadership void was at it’s most dreadful. I’m not too keen on the rotating alternates idea. I think it reeks of a void in leadership.
It’s gotta be Markov, even though he speaks less english than most dogs in my neighbourhood.

by 

















