Top 50 Montreal Canadiens Statistical Goaltending Performances 40-31
Hackett was a solid NHL goaltender. Put him on the 1980-83 Canadiens, and he is likely in the top 20 of this list.
Roy's rookie season was solid, but did not leave any indication of what was to come in April and May. For me, he didn't announce his future greatness until May 5, 1986. I have had the VHS tape of Game 3 against the Rangers for over 20 years, and although it doesn't match the anxiety of watching it live, it was the first glimpse at what lie ahead. How that game or Eric Desjardin's hat trick in the 1993 finals did not make the 10 greatest games DVD is beyond me, but at least I get to watch the Heritage Classic whenever I want to.
Vachon struggled to unseat Worsley as the Canadiens starter in 1969 and was again relegated to the bench for the 1968 playoffs. He caught his break during the second round when Worsley broke his hand. Vachon stepped in and went 7-1 with a 1.42 GAA as the Habs eliminated the Bruins and swept the Blues to win the Stanley Cup. The Canadiens paved the way for Vachon's ascension by dealing Tony Esposito to the Hawks.
Thomas can thank Ken Dryden and his decision to take a $123,000 pay cut for being on this list. Dryden left the Canadiens high and dry in 1974 to intern at a law firm, leaving the duties to Wayne Thomas, Michel Plasse and a 21 year old Larocque.
Thomas enjoyed the best regular season of the three, but Larocque lead the charge into the playoffs as the defending champions flamed out in the first round, thus paving the way for the emergence of the Broad Street bully era in the NHL.
I wonder if Dryden has a fifteen minute dissertation about how he may have had a hand in the ascent of the goon era.
Theodore returned from his 2003 vacation and appeared to have regained his MVP form. Although his numbers appeared similar to his 2002 campaign, they were helped by the lowest scoring season in post expansion history. They also were strikingly similar to Mathieu Garon's. After leading the Habs to another upset of the Bruins, the perception was that Theodore had returned, but being traded for David Aebischer was an announcement to the NHL that his days as an elite goaltender were over. Fortunately for him, Pierre Lacroix and George McPhee weren't listening.
With Worsley temporarily retiring in 1969 after 8 games, Vachon had finally become the undisputed starter in Montreal. During his first season as the go - to goalie, the Canadiens missed the playoffs for the only time in 45 seasons (1948-1994). Vachon took his share of the blame and with Tony Esposito registering 15 shutouts and winning the Calder/Vezina trophy combo in Chicago, the 1969-70 season was the beginning of the end for Rogie in Montreal.
I have seen it explained before that Roy's 1993 playoff performance was overrated because he didn't raise his playoff level as much as he lowered his regular season performance. Granted his performance in the 1993 regular season was a disappointment compared to the level he had established between 1989-92, but Roy was adjusting to life without Pat Burns and the implementation of a more wide open system.
Roy's 1993 performance placed him 5th among NHL goaltenders in efficiency, not exactly a poor season. Roy gets the bulk of the credit for the 1993 Cup, but it is something that has been overplayed by the media. He was the Canadiens best player and deserving of the Conn Smythe trophy, but a 103 pt team that was leading the NHL standings with 15 games to go was not a fluke.
You don't win the Stanley Cup on goaltending alone. Eric Desjardins, Matthieu Schneider and John Leclair went on to great careers, but in 1993 were not viewed with the same amount of respect as they are now. It is easy to see why the '93 Habs were disrespected, as a Roy fan, I would love to perpetuate the myth, but it's not reality.
Jeff Hackett replaced Thibault in the Canadiens goal for the 1999 season. Hackett did an admirable job for a terrible Canadiens squad that saw Rejean Houle continue the dismantling of the one - time contender. Houle followed up the Hackett deal by unloading Mark Recchi and Vincent Damphousse as the Canadiens stumbled to their lowest point total in over 35 years. Houle managed to turn Roy, Turgeon, Damphousse and Recch into Hackett, Corson, Zubrus and a couple of draft picks. Hackett was a solid goaltender, but just happened to be in Montreal at the wrong time. During his 5 seasons the Canadiens went 161-179-48-22. Their worst stretch since the 1930's.
Dead man walking. That was Huet's 2008 season. Huet was in a walk year and with Jaroslav Halak lighting up the AHL and Carey Price coming off a huge season, it was unlikely the Habs would waste $5M in cap space to resign what they essentially viewed as a bridge. When Huet failed to outperform the 20 year old Price, he was dealt to Washington at the deadline.
In an ideal world, Huet could have acted as a mentor to Price and possibly stepped in when he faltered in the 2nd round, but the NHL 2.0 does not provide that luxury.
If anybody signed a deal with the devil it would be Steve Penney. There is nothing in his career, pre and post 1985 playoffs that could suggest what occurred for those magical six weeks and the following season. Penney had arrived like a messiah leading the Canadiens back to respectability in March of 1984, but it wasn't Penney who had signed the deal with the devil, it was the Canadiens. The dark prince to all those who love offensive hockey was responsible for the magical transformation of the journeyman goaltender. 63 games into the 1984 season the Canadiens hired Jacques Lemaire to replace Bob Berry, and with that the Canadiens choked the offense out of oppositions. Two weeks later Steve Penney joined the team.
It is no coincidence that when Lemaire left in 1985 that Penney's game left with him. Steve Penney was never relevant without Jacques Lemaire behind the bench, coincidence? I think not.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
Interesting articles
Very entertaining read, for sure.
The one thing that nags at me is your used of normalised statistics. I think these kind of analyses are generally overused. Personally, i don’t like to totally discredit the way the sport has evolved over the years by mathematically levelling the field. All the adjusted stats say is how each goalie did relative to his peers that year. It’s OK on average but it does have flaws.
Incidentally, how does Hackett 98-99 slip behind his statistical inferior in Huet from 32 to 33?
Averaging the statistics is better than comparing it straight
It isn’t fair to view Roy’s SV% to the career mark of somebody who played in an era that was reliant
on his breakthrough’s to achieve that SV%. To view Martin Biron’s career .911 SV% in comparison to
Roy’s .910 is disingenuous. Roy lead the league in SV% 4 times and Biron has never cracked the top 5.
It is obvious it isn’t exact. But averaging the statistic out simplifies it for the reader and acknowledges that
although the number may look inferior, when it is used comparatively to his peers at the time, that it is actually
superior.
Hackett trailed Huet signifigantly in Winning percentage and minimally in SV%. His lead in GAA and SOs was not
enough to overcome the gap gained from Huet’s record. Hence why they were so close. The winning percentage
is not highlighted in red because it was not adjusted because of lack of game logs before 1997.
www.fantasysensehockey.blogspot.com
Winning percentages post-lockout treated all OT losses (shootout or 4 on 4) as a tie. Before the shootout, if you lost in OT, even in the era of the loser point, you got a loss. That might only have a minimal effect, but it’s worth a bit of consideration.
Great stuff, though. I had actually forgotten how Roy wasn’t the top (or second) goalie in 1992-1993… he was a merely only about a top 5-10 guy that year. lol
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
Thanks Sask
I could have done some adjusting and estimating based on the amount of ties decided in OT during the
1970’s and 1980s. But there was no way to know who was the actual goaltender of record. SInce 1999
every game log is easily accessible, but prior to that it is difficult to find.
It is likely that Dryden’s record would have improved dramatically had he had today’s rules where
his ties would have remained and he would have likely picked up another 5-6 wins in the shootout.
Most goalies pre 4 on 4 OT would likely have seen a boost to their winning percentages.
www.fantasysensehockey.blogspot.com
It’d probably be easier to do the opposite… give all goalies post-lockout a loss for a 4 on 4 OT loss. Shootouts are a tie.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
The only problem was finding out the losses between 1984 and 1999 that occured in OT.
I can find the game logs of the games the team lost in OT, but it has no reference to which goalie started the game.
So then the goalies from 1999-2009 would be adjusted to pre 1984 conditions to match the years from 1968-83,
but there would be no accurate adjustment from 1984-1998 as OT losses were strictly a loss.
Somebody like Roy probably has an extra 15-20 losses that would have been viewed as a tie in today’s NHL,
but lack of information makes it impossible to find barring me going to the Gazette’s archives for every boxscore.
www.fantasysensehockey.blogspot.com

by 






























