Habs Eyes On The Prize: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: SB Nation MMA Rankings for August 2010

Who'll Be The Next Coach Tossed Into The Habs Roulette

2422699963_d8c50285cb_medium

Maybe you are like me - pinching yourself thinking that yesterday's news is all a bad nightmare.

Or maybe you are like any member of the Montreal Canadiens brass, feeling that the centennial season has turned into one.

I will always like Guy Carbonneau, as a former on ice warrior for the Habs, and as a coach.

As warriors go, was there ever a better foot soldier than Gainey? I trust his judgement and instinct in this decision, but I don't have to like it.

I think the 100 seasons celebrations placed unnecessary expectation on the club. Perhaps they were unrealistic as well. I'm not a big fan of blowing up the blueprint or changing horses in mid stream. I also hate resorting to using cliches.

Back the Habs go onto the coaching roulette, with the GM as interim bench boss.

Where my confusion and conflict lies, is when Gainey states yesterday that younger players brought up from Hamilton sometimes regress after intial successes. He even noted that the club expects it to happen in certain cases almost plans on it.

An analogy in all this, would involve a steep hill and a mountain bike. You gather steam peddling like mad, and make it halfway up. The steepness of the curve at some point stops you in your tracks. You roll back a bit, and return to a place from which you can build more steam for the climb. You try it again, and make it a little further past where you once were stranded. You look around, find another place from which to push a little further. You do this repeatedly. Sometimes the bike gets a flat tire and you make the rest of the way by foot, other times there's enough strength left in your legs to peddle those final hard lengths. You reach the end of your might and you can see the summit in sight, and it energizes you for one final thrust. You keep at it and reach the top of the mountain - reaching it because you never gave up.

You could say this mountain bike didn't blow a tire. It might have sprung a slow leak, and threatened to go flat. Yesterday, the air was let out of it, and it had to be replaced by a whole new wheel. Time will tell if the bike was repaired halfway up the mountain or not. Time will tell if new replacement parts are needed. Someone else might take a look at it and say all it needed was a squirt of oil and a dab of grease.

Is grooming a hockey club, or a coach, any different? In expecting rookies and sophomores to make backsteps, does this not apply to coaches as well, and team's in general?

The answer will likely go unheard, as to how many second chances Gainey gave Carbonneau.

I thought he was in it for the long haul, to become a better coach with each passing season, learning from its inherant trials.

Now Gainey hops on the bike at the bottom of the mountain, patchkit in hand, and ready to run it up as quickly as this limited time in building speed allows him. Wherever the wheels stop turning, will be the starting point where the next rider takes over from.

The climb will begin at the bottom with no idea where the oil and grease are needed, no clue where the rough spots lie, and few notions as to which area to avoid steering into. When air starts to leak out, it will be realized that the pump has been left behind at the base.

And we will be privelege to watch it all happen all over again.

Roy_jersey_medium

When coaches are on the hot seat in Montreal, names start popping up left and right as to who would make a good successor.

Two such names already on people lips are former Colorado coach Bob Hartley ( coached the Cornwall Aces here in town and I do not not not like him!) and inevitably, Patrick Roy.

Gainey will be bringing Hamilton's Don Lever, knows as very good teacher, to assist him in Montreal.

Is he being groomed for the Canadiens job? It would be risky for Gainey to state as much, as a conspiracy against the english named Lever would immediately be launched against him.

Unlike when Gainey took over in 2006 and brought in Carbonneau to replace Julien, there is no heir apparent to the job at present. The speculation will be rampant. Let the polling start now!

Poll
Being that it is highly unlikely that Gainey remains on the job past this season, the coaching door remains half open for 2009-10. Who do see as the best fit for Montreal?
Hey, Hartley's won a Cup, speaks francais, why not him?
35 votes
Patrick Roy, it's destiny man! He could help Price too!
67 votes
Marc Crawford also speaks french, coached the Nords and Avs, and has won a Cup.
49 votes
Lever is a logical successor. No NHL experience, but is already familiar with half the team.
75 votes
Pat Quinn, just for laughs!
7 votes
Don't like none of the above. How's Pat Burns' health these days?
30 votes

263 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 43 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Time to get a real coach...

Who ever the Habs get next year,with or with out Gainey,they have to be the real deal or its a continuing bad joke ! REAL coaches with tons of proven N.H.L.experence and real honest to god superstars to lead the group ,Lecavalier would be my pick…..enough of the drama,this teams destiny is as a CHAMPION!

by Xtrahabsfan on Mar 10, 2009 2:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Even less experienced than Carbo?

That’s going in the opposite direction. Muller had one year of assistant’s duties with a college team before joining Montreal in 2007-08.

by Robert L on Mar 10, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh

Roy’s pedigree isn’t that much better.

by playingwithfire on Mar 11, 2009 1:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s hard to ask a junior coach of three seasons to have achieved more. A Memorial Cup win and the best attendance in junior hockey speak for itself.

by Robert L on Mar 11, 2009 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

still want to see at least some AHL success at the very least

Mourning Guy Carbonneau...
Royals obscure player to watch in ST: Lenny DiNardo

by playingwithfire on Mar 11, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

AHL level success is good of course, but unlike every other microscope, this is best gauged by how players a coach sends to the NHL and not as by winning championships per se. Both are important, but a lot of successful AHL coaches have had veteran laden team full of players no longer on the NHL radar. If a coach can win with a team full of young prospect, then that is the truest test of his worth.

by Robert L on Mar 11, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lever is a logical choice, no doubt about it. He’s coached the Kostitsyns, Price, Halak, Pacioretty, D’Agostini, Stewart, Chipchura, and Weber, all of whom could be on the team next year.

But Roy is the frontrunner from my perspective, and I think he just might be ready for that next step. If Roy can lean on Lever and Jarvis (or someone else of high standing) for support I think he can succeed.

Just clear Kovalev out of the way for the new guy!

Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.

by saskhab on Mar 10, 2009 2:13 PM EDT reply actions  

How good is Lever’s french?

It’s undeniable, as much as some don’t like it, that it has to factor in.

by Robert L on Mar 10, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Probably that with Kovalev gone, anyone could coach this team… yeah I’m bitter.

by Habs on Mar 10, 2009 2:17 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree about the pressure

This is all because of last season’s overachievement.

For months I have been arguing that this season is not the end goal, but a lot of the fanbase lost their mind with their surprise run last season. Then they jumped to Stanley Cup aspirations before the Habs were ready.

I have to think that this has been brought on by the pressure of not embarrasing the franchise after begging the hockey world to pay attention to them with ceremony after ceremony.

Saskhab made a great point in his post about treating Carbo like they do Price. There is no chance that Gainey would bail on Price after his recent struggles, so I don’t understand why such a patient man would bail on a guy he handpicked and three months ago called his greatest hire.

Why hire Roy if you are not going to allow him to trip and fall on the way as well? But this situation is full of contradictions, so I expect Roy to be the guy in the summer. I can’t stand Hartley or Crawford and Lever does not speak french.

If only Burns were healthy, that would be the guy I would be all over!

by Wamsley on Mar 10, 2009 2:31 PM EDT reply actions  

“Why hire Roy if you are not going to allow him to trip and fall on the way as well? But this situation is full of contradictions, so I expect Roy to be the guy in the summer. I can’t stand Hartley or Crawford and Lever does not speak french. If only Burns were healthy, that would be the guy I would be all over!”

…..an echo of my exact sentiments.

Crawford also coached in Cornwall, and in fact married a schoolmate from my theatre arts class. He’s not the guy for the job.

Roy, I would be totally surprised if he turned his back on junior hockey. The Remparts have the best attendence in the CHL and he’s sitting on a goldmine.

Who’d leave the King’s throne to play foole?

by Robert L on Mar 10, 2009 3:26 PM EDT reply actions  

This & That

1. after 3 years if you cannot communicate with your employees you get fired…Carbo is not Scotty Bowman nor is it the 70s

2. Patrick Roy, are you kidding me…what background does he have to coach an NHL team

3. yesterday they only fired 1/2 of the problem…..the summer will be an eye opener …. get out the weeping towels now

by pfhabs on Mar 10, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do you think Gainey is a better communicator? You think BOwman was?

What background did Toe Blake, Al McNeil, Jean Perron and Pat Burns have when they started and either won the Cup or made the final their first year.

by Robert L on Mar 10, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

1. Gainey is the boss, they will listen better and yes I believe him to be a better communicator…the reference to Bowman was to indicate Guy shouldn’t have tried to coach like his coach did in a different period in history…Bowman had won Cups as a coach Guy did not. he had a pedigre, a cache

2. Robert you are kidding aren’t you…to equate today’s player and their needs to those in Blake’s day is plain nonsense, same with the others. different game, different players and coach needs to be more psychologist these days than before when you could use intimidation…as did Burns

by pfhabs on Mar 10, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the communication problem belongs to the players, not the coach. It’s also a comprehension problem with fans who do not understand the mechanisms of what the job entails.

Also, I never equated era’s past and present. You misunderstood what I was getting at. The point is that coaches have learned at lower levels since forever.

A play on words…name one first time NHL coach that had previous NHL experience.

Everyone starts somewhere. Roy, who wouldn’t be my choice, has three years in junior with a Memorial Cup to his credit. That’s the same exact resume as Deboer, who’s turned the Panthers around fairly well this season. As I said, I don’t want Roy, but there is merit in his candidacy.

As for players from Blake’s era to today, there are obvious differences, but there are also a great many things that never change. I could recite a littany of examples going back to Newsy Lalonde and Didier Pitre’s contract squabbles and icetime demands in 1911 to Doug Harvey’s off ice issues in the late 50’s to Henri Richard’s aguments with McNeil is 1971 make the point.

by Robert L on Mar 11, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Coaching 101

“I think the communication problem belongs to the players, not the coach. It’s also a comprehension problem with fans who do not understand the mechanisms of what the job entails.”

1. ultimately how is the comm problem the players issue ?

2. interesting, in your view what does the job entail ?

by pfhabs on Mar 12, 2009 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Deboer

same road different vehicle…do not recall Deboer sending his son down to beat the shit out of an opposing goalie…Patrick has a lot of leadership gaps that we do not see in Peter

by pfhabs on Mar 12, 2009 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can twist a point better than a woman. You lost me a good while ago on this one.

I can’t comprehend how you can suggest leadership gaps in a three time Conn Smythe winner who many a team mate felt he was the de facto captain of both teams he played for. The guy has won at three different levels! Deboer on the other hand, is a virtual unknown. How the hell would anyone know what his traits are one season into his NHL coaching career?

by Robert L on Mar 12, 2009 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Deboer #2

Robert let me make this easy for you

1. leading a group of equals; i.e., teammates and the skill set required there is different than leading a group of individuals who are not your equals; i.e, your players. you run their on ice lives, you decide if they play, who they play with, the systems they play and for how long they play. you are in fact their boss. no matter how much Patrick influenced Jacques Demers, Patrick led his teammates in a different matter than did any of his coaches. being the boss or being an equal requires different skill set, implies different parameters with different consequences. what Patrick accomplished as a player (awards etc) does not translate to leading a group of men as their boss.

2. Patrick coaches in the Q not the NHL and the goalie punch out by his son was based on fear and intimidation—-father to son. he berrates refs, opposing coaches, players and his own players…that will never work in the NHL…Deboer has taken a young team and made them into a playoff contender and without countless video clips of intimidation….for me Patrick has leadership gaps as a coach

-hope that was linear enough for you

by pfhabs on Mar 13, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

the reference to Bowman was to indicate Guy shouldn’t have tried to coach like his coach did in a different period in history…Bowman had won Cups as a coach Guy did not. he had a pedigre, a cache

Am I misunderstanding this? Carbo never played for Bowman; he played for Ruel (2 GP), Berry, Lemaire, Perron, Burns, Demers, Keenan, Gainey (39 GP), and Hitchcock.

by Doogie2K on Mar 11, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bowman

nope my mistake…meant to say/indicate that Guy should not be trying to copy one of winningest (sp) coaches in history of game; in terms of tactics, strategy on or off ice

by pfhabs on Mar 12, 2009 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Carbonneau was hardly copying Bowman. And it wouldn’t have been a bad place to start studying.

by Robert L on Mar 12, 2009 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Carbo vs Bowman

no in fact in my view he tried to copy Bowman;

-endless line changes and mixing of personnel on those lines
-an aloofness towards his players
-lack of communication with players

-problem is players today do not equate to Canadiens’ players in the 70s
-Bowman had won a Cup as a coach and had cache, Guy was a near rookie head coach

by pfhabs on Mar 13, 2009 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many times can the Habs go back to the rookie well? It was pointed out in Mirtle’s thread, but while I’m sure Lever has a great minor-league resume, so did Claude Julien before he was hired in ‘03, and he was out the door three years later with four playoff wins to his credit. A lot of the Habs’ recent rookie head coaches have gone on to equal or greater success elsewhere, and at some point you have to wonder why Montreal is doing all the on-the-job training here. Jacques Demers, the club’s last championship coach, was a 20-year major-pro coaching veteran, including twelve years as head man and two Jack Adamses when he was hired. I mean, I voted for Lever, sure, because it’s probably what I’d do if I was Gainey, but as a fan, geez, it’s tempting to look at Pat Quinn’s resume and wonder.

by Doogie2K on Mar 10, 2009 6:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Because there are not a lot of francophone coaches

The Habs want a french coach. So they have a limited pool to pull from. So they need to hire unknowns.
As long as the coach needs to be francophone, this will not change.

by Wamsley on Mar 10, 2009 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

On some level, I get that, but then again, why expose the coach to the jackals in the French media? Hardly seems worth it. I’m sure even if he did learn to speak French, they’d jump all over his ass for not being “really” French or some bollocks like that. Hell, look at how they treat poor Saku.

by Doogie2K on Mar 10, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

To follow up the prior point about rookie head coaches, I took a look at the coaches from ’79 to present (always a convenient interval in examining the merely-mortal Habs) to see what I could unearth:

1) Bernie Geoffrion (1979) – Shockingly, one of the most experienced hires of the modern era, with a half-year as a player-coach in New York (the NHL’s last, if memory serves, with only Glen Sather of the WHA’s Oilers succeeding him in major-pro) and three years behind the bench of the expansion Atlanta Flames. Only lasted 30 games due to health concerns, and never coached again.
2) Claude Ruel (1979-81) – A retread from the pre-Bowman days brought back after Geoffrion’s retirement. Fired after getting swept by the Oilers in three straight, and never coached again.
3) Bob Berry (1981-84) – Got into coaching his old team, the LA Kings, shortly after retiring. Got the job in Montreal after three decent years in LA with no playoff series wins. Left Montreal three years later with just as many. Continued on the next year with the rebuilding Penguins and, after a five-year hiatus, the Blues, who won him his only playoff series in 1993.
4) Jacques Lemaire (1984-85) – The first rookie on the list, who took over from Berry near the end of 1983-84. Led the Habs to the conference finals against the four-time champion Islanders before losing. Only lasted one more season with Montreal, but went on to win a Stanley Cup in New Jersey (‘95), and also guided the still-new Minnesota Wild to their only conference final in ’03.
5) Jean Perron (1985-88) – Won a Stanley Cup with Patrick Roy. Coached some decent Habs teams, but ran into the Bruins a couple of times and that was all she wrote. His only other coaching experience was a half-season in Quebec the following year.
6) Pat Burns (1988-92) – Now we’re into territory I can remember. Jack Adams and a Cup Final his rookie year, some solid regular seasons, but more trouble from the damned Bruins. Moved on to Toronto and Boston, where he racked up two more Adams Trophies and another conference final. Finally got his ring in ‘03 with the Devils.
7) Jacques Demers – As previously stated, had a dozen years of head-coaching experience going into the job with Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Quebec, St. Louis, and Detroit (the last of which earned him two Adams Trophies) before coming home to win the Cup. Also presided over the Habs’ first playoff miss since 1970 and was turfed four games into the next season. Coached a couple of awful Lightning teams afterwards, then moved into management and broadcasting.
8) Mario Tremblay (1995-97) – Yes, I’m ignoring one-game wonder Jacques Laperriere. Anyway, Tremblay was another rookie, and famously forced the Patrick Roy trade (though it might have been coming regardless), then failed to see much in the way of success. Made the playoffs both seasons, but that’s the most you can say. Now an assistant in Minny with Lemaire.
9) Alain Vigneault (1997-2000) – Wasn’t he the first of a series of coaches brought up from the AHL team to coach the big boys? Anyway, after his first year, the team never made the playoffs, though I’m sure personnel had nothing to do with that. Fired in late 2000, spent several years in the minors, then won the Adams his first year back in the Show with Vancouver in ‘07. Currently being made to look very smart by some Italian kid named Luongo.
10) Michel Therrien (2000-03) – Yeah, I remember the blow-up that was the beginning of the end of what was shaping up to be a magical ’02 run, between Theo’s heroics in net and Saku’s heroics just for showing up, never mind playing pretty darned well. Did much better his second time ‘round with Pittsburgh, getting to the Finals with some really solid young talent. It seems to me like he was a victim of injuries there, but whatever.
11) Claude Julien (2003-06) – Brought up from the shared farm team with Edmonton (an Oilers hire, too — I’m never sure if I should be bitter about that or not). Had a successful run in ‘04, but was replaced in ’06 by the GM. I always thought it was for playing Huet over Theo, but I was recently told he wasn’t helping the youngsters grow, so maybe that’s something. After a player revolution in New Jersey thwarted a promising season there, he’s found something good in Boston, being nominated alongside Carbo for an Adams last year. Jury’s out, but it’s looking good.
12) Bob Gainey (2006, 2009) – In Bob We Trust coached a series of mostly-bad sometimes-North Stars teams in the early to mid ‘90s, making a run to the Finals in his rookie year (1990-91), upsetting the defending-champion Oilers before being roasted by Mario Lemieux’s Penguins. Did much better as Stars GM, anyway. The Habs’ season turned around under him the first time around, though they wound up losing to the injury-blessed, eventual-champion Hurricanes (grrr). Fingers crossed the second time around goes better, though I’m not sure what I’d make of it if it did.
13) Guy Carbonneau (2006-09) – Obviously, we can’t know how he’ll do in his second job yet, but you have to think he’ll be a better communicator next time, no? I dunno, maybe he’s a better assistant coach.

So throwing out 1979-84, in which all coaching hires were vets, and again ignoring Laperriere, we have eight of ten head coaches being rookies in 25 years, and so far five of the seven who weren’t fired yesterday (Lemaire, Burns, Vigneault, Therrien, and Julien) have had equal or better success with subsequent jobs as they have in Montreal. Make of all that what you will.

by Doogie2K on Mar 10, 2009 7:13 PM EDT reply actions  

And yes it occurs to me that probably could’ve been a fanpost or even thrown up on my own woefully-neglected site, but too late now.

by Doogie2K on Mar 10, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe not! Keep an eye out.

by Robert L on Mar 10, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pat Quinn

If the habs organization wants an experienced coach who knows how to win, then they should seriously consider Quinn. Quinn has an excellent resume. Having a winning team should be priority, and not the language. If a translator is required during media sessions, then provide it. In my opinion, Quinn is more qualified than any of the other names being mentioned.

by bolder on Mar 10, 2009 7:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Two Steps Forward, One Step Back

“Two steps forward, one step back” is a phrase that expresses not only Robert L.’s thought about young player development but also the kind of patience and thoughtful reappraisal that is required to accomplish almost any complex task successfully—like coaching an NHL team and developing it into a true championship contender.

Patience eventually would have paid huge dividends in Guy Carbonneau’s case. With Guy’s firing, the club abandoned two steps forward, one step back in favor of jumping over to an entirely new track. Once again short-term demands have supplanted what’s best for the long term. So much for five-year plans. In fact, so much for any planning period.

I don’t know who should coach the team. But I do know it should not be Patrick Roy. He has neither the temperament nor the background to coach at the highest level. It would be a disaster.

by Peter Young on Mar 10, 2009 11:21 PM EDT reply actions  

If this is the Canadiens 99th or 101st season, this year’s Guy Carbonneau doesn’t get fired. I think the expectations killed a promising coach.

by Robert L on Mar 11, 2009 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Coaching Qualifications

God forbid we should actually hire a coach that’s qualified to do the job. I don’t know if any of you follow L’antichambre on RDS after the games but man, they really harp on the fact that an English coach is unacceptable in Quebec. I’m sorry, but it’s not actually the coach’s job to be bilingual, it’s the coach’s job to coach the hockey team.

Sure, it’s always an asset to know French, but honestly, come on, it shouldn’t be the deciding factor in hiring the next coach!

That being said, I still think Bob Hartley has good hockey sense and would be a decent choice as the next coach. Not that it really matters since coaches just get recycled from team to team every couple of years… sigh

Also, I agree with most people here that Roy should definitely not be the next coach. The guy is a loose cannon (an incredible goaler with a lot of heart and enthusiam) but certainly not an ideal NHL coach at this point.

Mario Tremblay, don’t even get me started on Mario Tremblay!!!!

by Skrewball on Mar 11, 2009 11:21 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with you that bilingualism really has no logical reason being an issue in selecting a coach for the Habs, however with the french media in Montreal most things are not logical when it comes to hockey.

The fact is, it WILL be a deciding factor in terms of who’s the next coach. L’Antichambre is supposed to be a rather mellow and neutral show (more or less, or course), as opposed to 110%. Imagine that, they were all getting their panties in a bunch last night thinking about an Anglo head coach… what would happen with the real radicals?

If language was not an issue, I’d strongly recommend Ted Nolan for the job. He’s a guy that managed minor miracles with an abysmal Islanders squad, and left voluntarily when he found he was not given enough leeway in managing the young players (specifically he wanted to give them more ice time and management wanted to build around veterans). He also has half decent coaching stats at the helm of some very bad Sabres team. This is a guy that has a reputation for getting the most out of his players (wouldn’t that be nice with this bunch of half-assed players??).

Now considering the fact that language will surely be an issue, Bob Hartley is probably the guy that gets the call. I really don’t have a good impression of him, though that might just be because he’s on RDS sometimes and he’s not a good TV guy.

by Habs on Mar 11, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not just about hockey… being the Head Coach implies a lot of other duties, be it charity functions, representing the team to sponsors, and yes, media exposure. All of these duties points to a coach who is bilingual.

Interestingly, Denis Savard, a bilingual ex-Hab with past NHL head coaching experience, has been left out of this discussion entirely.

Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.

by saskhab on Mar 11, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

In Utopia maybe!

I understand that in a perfect world, languge should be a non issue in regards to Canadiens coaches, but in Montreal a unilingual english coach and the GM who dared hire him would be fried and eaten alive from day one.

by Robert L on Mar 11, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

And that’s really too bad – the amount of good coaches we’re passing up because of that rule is ridiculous.

As for Denis Savard, not sure he’s that great of a coach. He doesn’t have a lot of experience (147 games) and hasn’t coached for .500. Both years he was at the helm with the Hawks, they missed the playoffs. Now he’s gone, and they’re challenging for a division title… I’m really not certain he has the makings of a great coach. I’d rather have Hartley or Crawford, at this rate.

by Habs on Mar 11, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dunno, that’s not an entirely fair standard, as he was coaching a rebuilding team. I’m not totally sold they wouldn’t have turned it around under him anyway, though obviously, I don’t follow the Hawks nightly. Besides, it’s just as likely that Savard’s learned a few things from his first kick at the can as some of our other ex-coaches/future Jack Adams winners have.

by Doogie2K on Mar 11, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s sad that it is that way, but on CKAC this afternoon, there was an open line discussion that supported the idea of hiring the best man – period. Maybe sensibilities are changing. Of course, if the team won consistently, it would shut a lot of it up. A unilingual english coach with a french assistant might fly.

by Robert L on Mar 11, 2009 2:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Following up Saskhab’s idea, maybe Denis Savard comes in as an assistant to [insert qualified Anglophone here] to help fill that role?

by Doogie2K on Mar 11, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

His name might mentions, but I don’t see him in the mix. To me, the biggest reason he got in, in Chicago, was that he was William Wirtz’s pet. As a coach, nothing about him makes me stand up and take note.

by Robert L on Mar 11, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Montreal Canadiens.
Start posting about the Canadiens »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small
Happy Birthday Pierre Turgeon!
2987845178_b30976f7f9_small
Ticket info for the Habs road warrior faithful
Jp_small
Ken Dryden's Comments On Larry Robinson
Hockey_small
Any word on Price's contract talks?
27337_519236873_5263_n_small
Bob Gainey - The Last True Hero
Montcalm2_small
The Price to Pay...
Montcalm2_small
Auld??!?!
Gator_emblem_small
Ole, Ole, Ole, Ole....
Small
Plekanec vs Lombardi

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

PHILADELPHIA - MAY 16:  A fan of the Philadelphia Flyers holds up a sign reading "Next Goalie" behind goalie Carey Price #32 of the Montreal Canadiens in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals during the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Wachovia Center on May 16, 2010 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Habs Finally Lock Up Carey Price, Sign Goalie To Two-Year Deal

National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman answers questions during a pre-game media availability before the Pittsburgh Penguins season opener against the New York Rangers in a NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar) +25 updates

Ultimatum? NHL Reportedly Threatens To Toss Out Kovalchuk, Luongo Deals Without NHLPA Concessions

Photo +1 updates

Report: Donald Fehr Hands NHLPA List Of Conditions On Becoming Union Leader

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

A_new_eotp_logo_small Robert L

Editors

643c0d9c_small saskhab

Small Wamsley

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small yathehabsrule

Butch-montreal__2__-_copie__4__small Francis B.

Small Chris Boyle

Puckworlds-lg_small Bruce Peter

Jp_small Joe Pelletier