Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Roundtable: Which Draft Pick Is Most Likely To Bust?

Kovalev, Higgins, And The "C" and "A'' Controversies

A5_medium

A letter on a jersey is often a great source of pride for a hockey player. In Montreal, where the game's proportions are magnified beyond common sense at times, the awarding of the "A" and "C" on sweaters takes on a life of it's own when subject to speculation.

Recently, there have been two teapots tempests over such a thing in the Canadiens hierarchy, one dealing with the "A" that went missing on Chris Higgins' jersey, and the other, deeper rooted controversy involving the play of Alex Kovalev when borrowing captain Koivu's letter.

The Kovalev "C" theory, goes that he plays better when wearing it, but seems increasing unhappy and unproductive once it is removed. It is a bigger story than it really is apparently.

Contained here are two reports that dismiss the tale as nonsense, but the most telling might have been the proof offered up by RDS during Tuesday's broadcast of the Canadiens / Penguins game.

As it was told, the story reached Kovalev via inquisitive friends of his, and apparently caused him much distress. The player in question couldn't understand the origin of the controversy, it seems.

I am not 100% certain that I caught what RDS said next in exact detail - kids in the house equalling distraction - but I thought they mentioned that Kovalev himself decided to investigate such claims. Either way, the station posted a chart listed Kovalev's points per game average when wearing the "C" versus games in which he didn't over the last two seasons.

Much to the dismay of those behind this fabrication, Kovalev's point production decreases slightly when temporarily handed the captaincy. His PPG ratio when donning the "C" was 0.79 points per game, and 0.84 without it.

Pretty much unchanged, for all intents and purposes. Take a needle to that hot air balloon!

As for the removal of the "A" from Higgins' duds, the player concerned and the coach who made the call have yet to be heard from.

What it seems to boil down to, is that the "A" is probably a more comfortable fit on Komisarek's chest, for the team's sake, and for all concerned.

A6_medium

I'll read between here and suggest from past inferences, that perhaps the letter was a burden to Higgins in ways that it isn't to Komisarek.

In pieces translated and quoted below, the captain and Komisarek weigh in on what the letter does and does not represent. Both will point out, with much truth, that leadership and what it entails, does not begin or end with a letter place over the "CH".

Higgins himself, was unavailable for comment yesterday, as he was away from the practice rink for a scheduled therapy day realted to the injury that had kept him out of the lineup.

Here is an RDS article, transcribed from Renaud Lavoie's commentary and interviews:

A1_medium

Christopher Higgins may as well forget his title as assistant captain on the Canadiens. Coach Guy Carbonneau has decided not to remove the "A" that is presently stitched on the jersey of Mike Komisarek.

It has been five games since Higgins returned from the injury list, and the sweater he wears is no longer the same as the one he wore before he injured his left shoulder. Carbonneau met with Higgins recently to confirm that the "A" would be remaining on Komisarek for the balance of the season. The decision might seem a trifle insignificant, but it testifies to the respect now commanded by Komisarek.

"For me, when I didn't have an "A", it was never about having a letter on my jersey or not, and I think it's true for a guy like Higs or Breezer", said Komisarek. "I always told Breezer, he doesn't have an "A" on his jersey or a "C", but he's a leader, he's someone and he's a guy that's looked up to in this locker room. He's a guy that's won a Stanley Cup, and has been there and guys look up to. So does that make him not a leader that he doesn't have an "A". I think the same is true for Higs."

A2_medium

"Now for Chris, he's doing the same thing as before", says captain Saku Koivu. "and during the game, during the practice, you don't think about whether you have a letter on your jersey, you still have to be yourself and do those things. Regardless if you have a letter, the most important thing that you can get is the appreciation of your team mates and the respect that you're looking for."

Speaking of letters, Koivu says he was amused by the minicontroversy in the last few days regarding the perception by some that Alex Kovalev seemed to play better when wearing the "C" on his sweater. The speculation says Koivu, is no surprise considering the media market.

A3_medium

"I think it's something that happens often", says Koivu. "There's lots of media members and hockey is so big in Montreal, so obviously we know that there is a lot of talk and debate on different stuff. But for us as a team and as a member of the Canadiens, really what matters is what goes around in the room here, and we know how it is. I spoke with Kovy and I know it's not an issue."

A4_medium

Either way, there is a certain pride for an athlete in wearing a letter on his jersey. RDS wanted to speak to Higgins, but he was unfortunately not available to the media on Thurday.

I transcribed the players quotes word for word from a video clip posted in Thursday's archives that you can link to here.

Denis Poissant of Le Journal de Montreal had this to offer on the Kovalev and the "C" misunderstanding.

Yesterday after practice, Alex Kovalev closed the cover on the whole episode on the captain's "C" on his jersey.

"That's the most ridiculous thing I have heard on the part of journalists this season", said Kovalev, in mock laughter. He did admit to being frustrated by the situation.

The word in certain corners was that the talented Russian star wasn't playing with the same intensity since the return of Koivu, and that he was perhaps "dogging it" on the ice.

The Canadiens number 27 admits that his play hasn't been up to par. According to Kovalev, it was a "desire to try to do too much" and a lack synchronicity with linemates that led to the poor performances.

In the seemingly unending series of episodes in this ongoing Bell Centre melodrama of the past few seasons, coach carbonneau met with his talented, but sometimes underperforming ring winger.

"It's always good to have a talk, especially in light of the things being said over the last few days", said the coach. "I have no problems with Kovalev, or Begin, but I have a job to do. We put our cards on the table."

The meeting between the two allowed a point to be made.

"I have to play better, and everything will fall into place", says Kovalev. "I'm a professional, and I know what it takes to win."

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Montreal Media

Robert:

thanks for compiling the reports on this “news”…certain segments of the media covering the CH never fail to amuse. I guess when you have pages, or minutes of airtime to fill and you’re in competition for eyeballs and advertiser dollars anything goes even pure fabrication—-malicious or benign.

2 observations:

1. any wonder why along with the provincial taxes and school language issue for players kids why the media is up there as a reason given not to come to Montreal as a UFA

2. if a certain number of Canadiens fans’ brains did not disengage as the passion level around this team grew there wouldn’t be a market for this pap

by pfhabs on Feb 6, 2009 10:29 AM EST reply actions  

I don't mind...

It doesn’t bother me much when speculation is reported as opinion, and NOT news. The occasional blatant fabrication really gets to me. What pissed me off about this story, other than it wouldn’t go away, was that several sources practically insisted they knew it was true.

It’s pure common sense for a player to be shied away by the language and tax concerns, but when I hear players use the media as a reason for not coming to Montreal, I just flat out think they’re wimps.

To me, it helps sort out the players who have the guts and desire to win from those who prefer cashing their cheques and have piece peace of mind. Daniel Briere, comes to mind – glad he’s the Flyers problem to unload now, and not the Canadiens.

I want the player who knows the pressure makes him better. The wilting can sign elsewhere.

True about the Habs fans brains! The collective demographic in the Habs case spreads beyond the casual fan and female dishwashers who otherwise wouldn’t give a crap about the game in any other market. In Montreal, everyone is swept up, and with it comes a market for gossip. Where else could a show such as Lance et Compte exist?

by Robert L on Feb 6, 2009 12:30 PM EST reply actions  

The "Wimps"

Robert I agree with you as far as the player is concerned as he will see the “journalists” usually the next day. however a lot of UFAs are older, married and with kids and it would be tough to subject your spouse and children to the daily feed of criticism be it thorough the myriad of media outlets or on the street or at school…the players can handle his retaliation directly but the spouse and kids are now dealing with not only the journalists who they will not see but also with the varied interpretations of the fans they meet. as mentioned before some of which have parked their brains in neutral

so for a single guy I totally agree with your point but for a married player it’s a bit more complicated even more so if they are bilingual. an unhappy spouse brings it’s own set of issues…ask Pronger, Shanahan and a few others…although I totally agree that someone who cannot handle the “spice” in Montreal, as Gainey called it, should be avoided.

by pfhabs on Feb 6, 2009 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

...and onanother flipside...

It would come down to the individual, but sometimes an older player could also handle that better than a young and rich millionaire.

And I can just picture that french player’s kid at school hearing “Your Dad sucked last night!”

by Robert L on Feb 6, 2009 5:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Media Microscope

Hab players will always be under the microscope …. Thats the reality of playing for the habs. It was no different for past players as it is for the current players. Robert L says it best …. If players don’t want to play in Montreal because of the media, then they are wimps! Players should just focus on trying to win games and not care what other think or say.

by bolder on Feb 6, 2009 1:13 PM EST reply actions  

Bolder, I get what you are saying about former players having been under the same type of pressure and scrutiny then.

I’d be amiss not to point out though, that the situation is radically different today, what with every Habs game on the tele today instead of only one or two per week, media reps from as many as 30 outlets rather than 5 or 6, the advent of 24 hour sports channels on televison and call in radio shows, and the effect of internet in speeding up all this communication.

Athletes on the whole are much more serious today as well. Players with talent begin taking their careers seriously at 15 years of age, doing all the right things when it comes to avoiding substances, alcohol, proper eating habits, relationships, and training year round. The kids today are almost goody – two – shoes compared to animals of yesteryear.

Players through the Original Six era would make Sean Avery look like a pansy, and journalists from that era mostly swore off writing about of ice activities.

Today’s media, placed back in that era’s context, would have a field day. A player such as Doug Harvey, just to name one, wouldn’t survive.

by Robert L on Feb 6, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Good Point

Robert, you’re totally right about the coverage today compared to the coverage from back to the orginal six era. Way more coverage today, and bigtime coverage on off-ice issues as well. I would agree some players from yesteryear would have cracked under todays media scrutiny.

by bolder on Feb 6, 2009 2:11 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Montreal Canadiens.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Triple_low_five_small
The Bergevin Bunch – Who should be on the Canadiens’ Shortlist?
Triple_low_five_small
Anti-GM Race: The Search for the Worst Candidate
Triple_low_five_small
Habs GM Search: My Personal Shortlist
Ts_small
Vintage Hockey Jersey Scam
Predsgame_small
So yeah...
Lokomotiv_yaroslavl_logo_small
Welcome Mount Royal Soccer to SB Nation
Triple_low_five_small
The Montreal Canadiens and the Future
Picture_1_small
Other Crazy Eklund Trade Rumours
Picture_1_small
Randy Cunneyworth's Link To Homer Simpson
Picture_1_small
From Stars to Stars: A Look Back At Three Former Habs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

A Glossary of Analytical Stat Terms

For those unfamiliar with common terms on EOTP such as Fenwick, PDO or relative Corsi, here is a handy explanation.

Click here to access the glossary


Managing Editor

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small Kevin van Steendelaar

Feature Editors

A_new_eotp_logo_small Robert L

P1020029_small Andrew Berkshire

Butch-montreal__2__-_copie__4__small Francis B.

Small Chris Boyle

Lokomotiv_yaroslavl_logo_small Bruce Peter

Small Stephan Cooper

Contributing Writers

Small Olivier

Jp_small Joe Pelletier

Profile_small Melissa_Boufounos