Habs Eyes On The Prize: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: SB Nation MMA Rankings for August 2010

Halak, Bergeron and Plekanec Help Habs Pull Off Ridiculous Win

47-2_medium

Call the Canadiens 4-3 overtime win against the Thrashers in Atlanta, this: a game of extremities in a season of the same!

All told, it was close to 63 minutes of hockey to baffle every expert, one filled with connundrums to confound, a riddle bag of polar opposites and a bevy of ridiculous notions unfolding before your eyes.

The Thrashers provided the Habs' dominatrix on the evening, but failed to administer the full humiliation. The Canadiens seem intent to place themselves in a position to be bent, chained and whipped, but as shown before, they've either mastered a Houdini slipknot or own the keys to their own handcuffs.

A bunch of things, even at a prolonged glance, simply fail to add up. Just as this team is about to get written off as goners this season, it displays fortitude from the murkiest road trench. It gets shellacked, but the shell shocked goal stands tall. It plays an often small game, but its smurfs and midgets pull off a Gulliver-ish mutiny, turning the master into a slave.

Gull_1_medium

Star-divide

As evidence, the Canadiens are out shot 50 to 23 and goalie Jaroslav Halak is, unbelievably not named one of the game's three stars. This game would have been over about 12 minutes in had it not been for his second stellar performance in as many games.

The Habs have surrendered 90 shots in the first two games of this seven game road trip and are 2-0. Halak has stopped 87 of those and continues to make a case that he's a number one goalie, somehwere if not in Montreal. If GM Gainey is seriously considering trading him, the 360 degree smile on his face threatens to separate the top of his head from his jaw these days. The longer he hangs in, the more Halak's value rises.

41_medium

Halak's two biggest accomplices in this "wrestled from the jaws of defeat" win were pint sized hero Marc - Andre Bergeron and the genitally reassigned Tomas Plekanec (check this!), indeed a pair of valuable commodities that will cost the Canadiens more dinero next season.

Bergeron's nightly resume included no less than scoring the tying goal in the game's final minutes on a cannon blast and adding the OT winner after receiving a beaut of a pass from Plekanec, steamrolling Thrashers' goalies Anders Hedberg while skating backwards, deking the goalie with a backhand into an open right side.

Earlier in third, Bergeron earned a two minute minor for bowling over the same Hedberg, sweeping in from the corner to flatten the goalie without apology.

A Hab fan seated behind the Atlanta bench, was wearing Guillaume Latendresse's number, possibly as a reminder than Bergy has assumed his spot on the fourth line.

14_medium

MAB makes $750,000 on a one year, and GM Gainey cannot receive enough credit for this shrewd signing.

Bergeron, who dresses as a forward won't be confused with Chris Pronger anytime soon, but don't look now, he's tied for the NHL lead (with Dallas' Stephane Robidas) for goals by a defenseman with 9 and he's tied for 18th in points with 19. He goes to the net with aplomb as a forward, but can't find fit on the Habs starting 6 D despite the fact that since Andrei Markov's return, the team is surrendering an average of 45 shots a game.

The Trois - Rivieres, Quebec native was an NHL afterthought one week into the season, as 30 clubs passed on his services. The diminutive rearguard is occasionally a defensive minefield, but has made Gainey look like a genius for heaving him off the scrap pile after Markov went down. Now it looks as though Montreal have revived the killer two pronged power play point proficiency of the Markov - Mark Streit duo of year's past.

Who would have thought?

14-2_medium

Plekanec minus Kovalev equals superstar?

Tomas Plekanec is far and away the NHL Comeback Player of the Year. In his 38th game, he has now surpassed his 39 point total of last season. After posting a sub par 20 goals and 19 assists in 80 games, he now has 7 goals and a whopping 33 assists in 38 games.

Plekanec has always been an honest and dedicated player, but this type of turnaround requires great examination. As there is little new that Plekanec is truly showing - meaning we've seen this quality before from him, just not in this quantity - one has to wonder how and why it has all come to fore as he blossoms into quite the (expensive?) player. The most astute theory you'll hear is that he has had the burden of playing with Alex Kovalev removed from his nightly duty.

The Kladno native is now tied for second in the NHL in assists, something a Habs player can't likely lay claim to since the heyday of Elmer Lach. Lately Andrei Kostitsyn have benefitted as Mike Cammalleri is covered more closely in recent games. Plekanec prior to gelling with those two, was making any player on his trio look good.

Without the responsability of having to cater his game to Kovalev's weighty style, Plekanec has been freed to use all on ice elements like he rarely has be allowed in the past. It's a revelation to watch him bloom.

How about this for an extremity? The more pressing it becomes for Bob Gainey to resign the pending UFA, the less likely is Plekanec to be in a hurry. Just weeks ago, it looked like a $4.5M a year renumeration would make for a fine salary fit, but now Plekanec is obliterating arguments that he's worth a cool $6M.

Bob should approach such a negotiation like this:

"Tomas, how much? Sign here!"

Plekanec does it all for the Canadiens. He's a more than dependable front line center five on five with strong defensive habits and awarenesses. He's the pivotal draw man on a first PK unit that has gained gallons in credibility over the past month. He's been the shrewd and alusive centerman on the power play, with no recognizable stigmas for the opposition to stiffle him with. He's taking a beating, but keeps on ticking. As dangerous as he's become with the puck, he's not to be left unguarded without it.

The resume of his night's work against the Thrashers was akin to a platter of served hors d'oeuvres that all tasted uniquely different. His goal and three assists were offered as individual displays of all the things he's been doing so well across 38 games.

On his goal, he streaked to the net with Kostitsyn as a decoy, the second feed option far from the play. He craddled the pass a split second, aimed, and then zipped a wrister into the opposite top corner, catching Hedberg moving the other way. If you blinked, you missed him let up on dashing to the net, just as Cammalleri caught his gaze. It was a subtle but atuned example of one little detail in his game.

He did the grinder horse work on the Kostitsyn power play goal, fighting for the puck along the boards, never caughing it up while being shoved, hacked and handled by an Atlanta defenseman. He hung onto it no longer than he needed to, and just as he was about to draw more attention, he slipped a soft feed to Cammalleri in the corner, who fed pass to Kostitsyn at the crease. The Atlanta focus time on Plekanec was such that Andrei had time for two whacks in scoring the goal.

On the tying goal by Bergeron on the power play, Plekanec was set up in Kovalev's old playground off to the right side board. He was economical in three quick plays, first cultivating the puck as it skinned round the corner board. He then took a split second to place himself, never allowing the Atlanta coverage to settle still. As soon as a Thrasher moved toward him, Plekanec dished off to Bergeron at the point. Just as quick, he received the puck back from the blueline, passing a one - timer cross ice to Markov who fed Bergeron for the blast. On the clock, this took all of six seconds. Kovalev would have used up a minute to paint such artistry, but on Plekanec's canvas, the paint is stil wet.

The overtime winner four on four was a textbook demonstration of what players without the puck must do to create pressure and goals. First, Plekanec took off, flying into open space in mid ice for a feed from Josh Gorges. Receiving the pass, he strode over the red line into the Atlanta zone, twice dragging a skate and pausing briefly to scan the landscape. Stopping inside the blueline, he fed a blazing Bergeron with a pinpoint feed just as he hit the crease's edge. Curiously, had that play broken down, Plekanec had both Gorges and Cammalleri as additional trailers streaking in, with himself poised to handle the back check.

Not making the highlight reel, was a shorthanded breakaway by Plekanec that could have altered the game earlier on.

A similar short handed play with Markov leading on three on one rush died a quicker death when recipient Scott Gomez fired three feet wide without even allowing himself a better look at the netting available to him. Call it Gomez squeezing the stick and being unaccustomed to Markov's space and time creating feeds, but once the Thrashers had come back to retake the lead, this bungled play haunted as a possible turning point. For a team being dominated as such, it can't afford to waste precious scoring chances. The game would have been 3-1 at that point, and the short handed KO would have set the tone for the remainder of the game.

Sky_medium

Two final notes on the extremities theme.

It's great to see Andrei K looking like the better of his old selves again, but in a single game he's still quite capable of alertness and fog. On the Thrashers first goal late in the opening period, there must have been a dense mist encompassing AK46 as he was caught in the muck and mire three times in a split second span. As the first forechecker on a clearing play, he simply glided towards center, applying little puck pressure. From there, a coasting semi circle followed, not a gear engaged as a second pass sped by him. He'd lost his wing by this point, committed too far left and inside the Canadiens zone. Realizing he'd blown coverage, he stopped, did a sweep check and turned to find his defenseman Ron Hainsey streaking in behind him in the position he'd vacated. Hainsey skated in deep, unharmed and uncompromized, to feed Kovalchuk at the crease.

46_medium

Other than that miscue, there have been more confidence inspiring moments from Andrei. He seems to get that in the offensive zone, he has three mandates to fulfill: hit opponents who have the puck in his vicinity; make himself availaable for passes in open spaces, and follow shots briskly to the net. He's a PPG player when he zoned in, no better than a pylon when he's not.

We've seen it time again this season, how the Canadiens own the ability to use their speed assets and turn games on a dime. Does it not make you wonder why, in the team's approach, such strengths are not employed in forechecking the opposition to death in their own end. Wouldn't a "two men deep" philosophy allow players such as Maxim Lapierre and Max Pacioretty, just to name two, to gain more puck time deep in the right end. Plainly said, doesn't puck pressure lead to more puck possession?

Maybe they want to employ such tactics in their game, but the lack of a second strong scoring line kills any momentum, and the many penalties taken zaps the thrust from sustaining any prolonged, shift to shift attack. Perhaps solving these two sore spots would heighten the Canadien's overall standing, being that goaltending is better than good, the penalty kill is feared and power play has recently added a second cannon.

Cripes, does that constitute a statement of hope after all?

Extremities!

Game shots courtesy of Montreal Canadiens.com

 

Canadiens vs Thrashers boxscore

Bird Watchers Anonymous

Lions In Winter - Montreal Stars Complete Unlikely Comeback

HIO - About Last Night.....

 

0 recs  |  Comment 19 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Habs Eyes On The Prize

Habs Top 25 Under 25:  5-2

Sep 2010 by Bruce Peter - 26 comments

Habs Top 25 Under 25:  10-6

Aug 2010 by Bruce Peter - 22 comments

Habs Top 25 Under 25:  20-16

Aug 2010 by Bruce Peter - 3 comments

The Incomparable Big Three

Aug 2010 by Robert L - 18 comments

Comments

Display:

I definitely could’ve told you this about Bergeron going into the year: that he’s offensively talented, and when paired with an expert defender (like he was with Chris Pronger for half a year in Edmonton), he can rack up points like there’s no tomorrow without being burned significantly by his deficiencies. Without that…well, there’s a reason the Four Habs Fans call him the Urologist, because he’s a PP specialist, through and through. He’s not a good NHL defenceman at even strength.

Actually, I’m surprised more coaches haven’t tried him at forward the last three years. Lord knows he’s had enough of them (off the top of my head: Craig MacTavish, Ted Nolan, Randy Carlyle, Jacques Lemaire, Jacques Martin). Heck, I figured that they should’ve put Paul Coffey up front once he was past his prime/no longer paired with Charlie Huddy, because he was a defensive disaster but an offensive genius.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Dec 22, 2009 11:02 AM EST reply actions  

I had known about his tendencies, good and bad, I’d just never see them on display much. If Martin can get a handle on him, he’ll be a valuable asset beyond this one season.

by Robert L on Dec 22, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d be happy to see the midget settle somewhere after spending this much time as a journeyman. I always liked him, even if his gaffe did lead to Matt Greene (WTF was he doing on the ice?) breaking the goalie in the Finals.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Dec 22, 2009 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I think fitting Pleks and Price under the cap will be terribly tough. And so I wouldn’t be surprised if Bob decided to sell high. I understand he puts more points on the board and looks better than Gomez (who has the immense demerit of accepting 7.3 mil a year offer from the rangers, thus ensuring he is to be jeered until the end of that contract), but the fact is that we are stuck with Gomer. So I wouldn’t get too enamored with Pleks yet.

by Olivier on Dec 22, 2009 4:41 PM EST reply actions  

You’re kidding right?

by Robert L on Dec 22, 2009 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Well there’s the other problem.

Is this year’s Pleks for real, or is he more of a 65-70 point guy who’s having the one 80-point season of his career?

You do have to wonder about these things if you’re the GM. You can’t pay Pleky 6 million if he’s going to turn out to be more of a 60 point guy. As a fan you can love the top-10 in points, but as a GM, you have to wonder why he only has six goals so far. And so on.

Between that and the sorry state the team is in, the option to trade Pleks at the peak of his value just has to be considered. I don’t want it to happen, and I think the Habs will make room for him in the end, but if you’re Gainey, you have to think about it.

by MathMan on Dec 22, 2009 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve never bought into a strong season being accidental, the way a sub par one is. Two seasons ago, Plekanec posted 69 points. A normal season in 2008-09 would have seen hit 75. Should he hit 80 this time, it’s all on the same curve. Some players though, have career years and the league against them adjusts, but this isn’t the case with Plekanec.

As for how Gainey should assess him, I think it’s smarter to risk that he’s for real than not. What leaves a worse taste, a player that costs too much for a season that needs to be dumped, or gambling on a player (Leclair, Ribeiro) than pans out for another team and makes it look like a bad talent evaluation.

My motto would be, when in doubt, go with the known quantity and screw the variables. Sure things are better than guesses.

by Robert L on Dec 22, 2009 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

yes, that is a normal progression.

The only problem is, it does not refer to Plekanec. That is not reality, that is not what happened. He dropped off the face of the earth last season, so who is to say it does not happen again next season.

What do your 2010-11 Canadiens look like with $12-13M locked up in two 60 pt centers? This is one of my problems with Gainey, he needed to bridge that gap and sign him last season, instead he has waited for the UFA year when the salary gets escalated and made his own job 10x more difficult.

If Pleks finishes with 85 pts, the Habs will have to invest 5-6M+ in Pleks. They are already committed to $46M in 2010 on a core that looks awfully inept right now.

Gainey better be damn sure that Plekanec is a top 10 scorer in the NHL if he refuses to deal him at his career apex to this point.

by Chris Boyle on Dec 23, 2009 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s an interesting conundrum right now, but if the wheels come off this team (and they might very well do so), Gainey could package Pleks and Halak. The key is to get a young center back, an under 24 kid you shelter behind Gomez. And yes, seeing that Gomez only seems to produce if paired with good wingers grates my nerves, as you expect a 7+ mil player to be able to, you know, carry other guys with him. Anyway, it’s a boat anchor of a contract and Bob tied it around the team’s neck, so Gomez is the way we go for the next few years, like it or not.

by Olivier on Dec 23, 2009 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Hence my anger on June 30th.

Every decision made on this team over the next 4 years will revolve around that albatross of a contract.

by Chris Boyle on Dec 23, 2009 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

The Gomez contract is not a good contract but let’s not overstate the case. We could have been stuck with Chris Drury’s or Vincent Lecavalier’s.

Scary thought of the day : that contract was signed when the cap was much lower than now so relatively speaking, it was even worse then.

But the Habs have options for cap relief, not least of which is hiding salaries such as Laraque’s in the minors. If push really came to shove, the Habs could conceivably hide Gomez himself in the minors.

Since we’re at it though, let’s talk about Gomez himself. Because his contract wouldn’t look quite so bad, maybe a two million over payment, if he wasn’t having the worst season of his career.

It’s just not the points. Gomez has been the Rangers ’ 2nd best scorer over the last two years, and a reliable source of ES offense, but this year, nada. He’s always been a shooter, often top 20 in the league in shots, but these days barely anything. He was fantastic on Corsi for the Rangers, an especially jarring point now that the Habs get shelled so much. He has the profile of a guy who could carry a line, in puck possession if not in points.

Set aside the contract for a moment. What we have here is a good hockey player who is having a terrible season. What gives?

Is he hurt? Does he lack confidence?

Is he just a bad fit with Martin? It may seem odd, but he’s a puck possession player and he may just not work well in Martin’s anti-possession system.

What is it that’s making him worse than he’s ever been before?

by MathMan on Dec 24, 2009 1:14 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

The lack of forecheck is killing me

I would bet if someone looked into the periods that we actually outshot our opponents the entire year, you would see in those periods we employed an aggressive forecheck. It is astounding that we have not been more aggressive, as I have seen that aggression lead to some goals but (as you say above) doesn’t puck pressure lead to more puck possession? Aren’t we trying to be a puck posession team?

What better way to use the array of small, scrappy, and speedy forwards to the best of their abilities. Hopefully as we get our full compliment of forwards/defensemen we’ll employ this strategy. It is possible that all the line juggling and lack of faith in a beaten up defense corp led to this passive scheme, but I really want them to start playing with the petal down with the team more healthier now.

by blockersave93 on Dec 22, 2009 5:31 PM EST reply actions  

Martin’s strategy baffles me.

I complain about him a lot and what frustrates me is that he’s clearly a very competent coach on many levels. Oh, I’ve had my complaints and I still think his inability to use some of his players productively, such as Latendresse, is a major weakness that resulted in at least one ill-advisted transaction so far, and his usage of marginal players like Laraque is very questionable. But I can see the positives. The Habs are now the best special teams club in the league — after starting terrible in both PK and PP, they’re 3rd on the PP and 7th on the PK. The goaltending is top-notch now, again after starting terrible, which is a factor of both coaching goaltenders and coaching coverage.

But then you have the absolutely stupid passive system that results in terrifyingly horrible shot differentials. And you can tell that despite this the Habs are actually pretty good in coverage. Despite all the time spent in the offensive zone, they often manage to limit chances against, if not shots. Martin has designed a bad hockey system, a system that’s designed to lose games 2-1, but he has the team performing it exceedingly well! It really gets me.

He has the horses to be better 5-on-5, he has players who have done very well on other teams not to mention Markov and Plekanec and Andrei Kostitsyn who are all strong 5-on-5 guys, why does he insist on that passive, “let’s hang on and hope out goaltender saves us” crap? It makes sense if you’re Belarus playing Canada, but his guys are NHLers, some of them very good NHLers. It frustrates me to no end.

by MathMan on Dec 22, 2009 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I hear you MathMan …. Very frustrating! And if they kept stats during games on give aways, the habs definitly lead the league in that category! Man they give the puck away in their own zone steady or just dump it out to the other team …. So annoying!

by bolder on Dec 22, 2009 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

They do keep giveaway stats, but the stats are unreliable and very dependent on which rinks’ scorers are counting. The Bell Center gives much more giveaways than most other rinks, so when you read that the Habs have some of the worst giveaway stats in the league, you need to take it with a grain of salt.

by MathMan on Dec 22, 2009 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I watch games and see 40 giveaways in my eyes, and then after a game the stat is 12!

To me, a giveaway is also a voluntary dump to mid ice and not just an unconscious play.

by Robert L on Dec 22, 2009 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

A voluntary dump to mid ice is not a giveaway per se anymore than dumping the puck in the corner to change is.

Of course, if all you do is dumps to mid ice (hello, Montreal!) then you won’t own the puck very much even though you never commit a giveaway. That’s one of the problems with the Habs, IMO…

by MathMan on Dec 22, 2009 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Puck possesion teams, or those that want to be, change forwards when the D is in possession and vice versa. The Habs dump and change five because the shift is ocerextended. It’s not a system, it’s a panic.

by Robert L on Dec 22, 2009 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with you that they are giving the puck to the opponent and thus aren’t desirable, but they are not strictly giveaways because they’re voluntary turnovers. It’s trading possession for position.

A lot of the “panic” for the Habs results from the passive system that lets the opponent control the puck in the zone, and attack again once the D clears to center. If they had a better transition scheme they could attack more, and if they pressured the opponent they would get shot at less.

I’m not enamored of the Habs’ system. Seems to be the cause of a lot of their problems.

by MathMan on Dec 23, 2009 12:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Montreal Canadiens.
Start posting about the Canadiens »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small
Happy Birthday Pierre Turgeon!
2987845178_b30976f7f9_small
Ticket info for the Habs road warrior faithful
Jp_small
Ken Dryden's Comments On Larry Robinson
Hockey_small
Any word on Price's contract talks?
27337_519236873_5263_n_small
Bob Gainey - The Last True Hero
Montcalm2_small
The Price to Pay...
Montcalm2_small
Auld??!?!
Gator_emblem_small
Ole, Ole, Ole, Ole....
Small
Plekanec vs Lombardi

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

PHILADELPHIA - MAY 16:  A fan of the Philadelphia Flyers holds up a sign reading "Next Goalie" behind goalie Carey Price #32 of the Montreal Canadiens in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals during the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Wachovia Center on May 16, 2010 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Habs Finally Lock Up Carey Price, Sign Goalie To Two-Year Deal

National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman answers questions during a pre-game media availability before the Pittsburgh Penguins season opener against the New York Rangers in a NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar) +25 updates

Ultimatum? NHL Reportedly Threatens To Toss Out Kovalchuk, Luongo Deals Without NHLPA Concessions

Photo +1 updates

Report: Donald Fehr Hands NHLPA List Of Conditions On Becoming Union Leader

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

A_new_eotp_logo_small Robert L

Editors

643c0d9c_small saskhab

Small Wamsley

2987845178_b30976f7f9_small yathehabsrule

Butch-montreal__2__-_copie__4__small Francis B.

Small Chris Boyle

Puckworlds-lg_small Bruce Peter

Jp_small Joe Pelletier