Markov Return Sparks Habs
Bring on the hyperbole, the rhetoric, the obvious and the outrageous claims. Or, keep your feet firmly planted in reality, dim as it often can be. Not sure if the glass if half full or half empty today, but there are still fears that it is made of disposable plastic. Last night, the Canadiens ended a five game skid, shutting out the New York Islanders 3-0. The game was highlighted by the return of the Habs' best player. Yes, it sure is hard not to get caught up in the excitement sparked by Andrei Markov's headline snatching return to play, but there are a few points to consider while floating up to cloud nine, eyes glazing with great expectations. For starters, never use the New York Islanders as any type of measuring stick. Misleading isn't the word.
Markov's two goal contribution cannot be diminished, but it needs to be underlined that Canadiens' special teams and goaltending were factors one and two in this win. With Markov added, the Habs PP, already pretty decent without him, just got a whole hell of a lot more fearsome. The PK has been rolling along at a freight train's rhythm for a good spell now. Jaroslav Halak offered up his spectacular, once every second game, standout performance. But..... Markov's return is supposed to help set the Canadiens defensemen's minutes and usage to a more appropriate tuning. Playing a little over 20 minutes, such was accomplished. He played a somewhat daring game at times.
The concern, and it's been a constant issue, is how come the Islanders get off 75 shot opportunities in a game where the Canadiens' player's responsibilities have gotten more defined? That's 40 shots on goal, 24 blocked, and 11 misses - a whopping total not entirely explained by the Canadiens giving the Isles 6 PP chances. Wouldn't you assume that with Markov back, even though it is the first game, that the Canadiens might just keep the Isles to maybe 30 shots? Was that too much to expect? The bottom line I suppose, is that there will always be ugly wins, the two points in the standings in this type of season being what matters most for now.
Still, I'll take a bit more comfort in a game in which, say the Habs come up a minute short against New Jersey (or Pittsburgh!), than I can, for now, of a whitewash against the Islanders. But..... There is also some good news. Oddly, Tomas Plekanec took three of the Canadiens' six penalties, depriving the PK of his valuable contibution, and they still made out just fine. The number of Islander shots tend to tell the tale that the Canadiens didn't enjoy a great puck possession game, but the did do one thing very well when it counted most, which was winning faceoffs on the powerplay. Get a load of this. For the night, Plekanec and Gomez were 64% and 65% victorious on draws. On the power play, the team as a whole was a wicked 86% on faceoffs in the offensive zone, with NYI only winning one of seven. If you break it down, this just might be where the game was won and lost. Gomez, I'll admit, is finding subtle ways of impressing me of late. I've made it a point to study him more closely, ot simply concentrating on what he does with the puck in the offensive or neutral zones. I watched a solid performance by him against Jersey and against the Isles he was impeccably placed defensively for the majority of his "without the puck" responsibilities. I think that Sergei Kostitsyn can and will become a more valuable attribute to him once Brian Gionta replaces D' Agostini on that line. Sergei has a knack for puck possession deep, which in time, if kept intact, will manifest into passing options for Gomez and slotting time for Gionta. Some numbers.... Most shifts taken by a player, both teams: Markov with 30, at a 0:40 second average, a total of 20:25. Longest shift time average: Mark Streit at 1:08, closest was Kyle Okposo (silent K as Pierre Houde tells) at 0:59. Highest Habs, Georges Laraque and Marc - Andre Bergeron at 0:55 each. Most giveaways: Not so good, Hal Gill (5) and Halak (4) counting for 9 of the Canadiens' 15 giveaways. Most PP minutes: Streit with 7:17 for the Isles and Gomez with 3:35 for Montreal. Most PK minutes: Gomez and Sergei with 5:32, Gorges with 4:57, Mara 4:42 and Markov 4:15. Most shots on goal: For the Isles, Jack Hillen with 5, markov for the Habs with 4.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
As for how the Habs can keep getting shelled on shots at the goal? Personally, I’ve been blaming the coaching. This passive, concede-everything style associated with a lack of transition passes leads to a lot of offensive zone time for Canadiens opponents, and a lot of shots against. At least it also involves good defensive coverage, so the Habs don’t get embarassed, but it is not a style designed to win games, just not lose them… too badly.
Hopefully, now that Markov has returned and he has a guy who can do transition passes, Martin will start moving them towards an effective system towards winning games, maybe something that revolves around rapid transition and counter-attacks if he must insist on conceding the zone and possession so much, rather than this “hang on for dear life and hope our goalie bails us out” non-system.
But hey, gotta admit… over time he’s fixed the power play (top 10), the penalty kill (top 10), and even defensive coverage (mostly; they do a fair few mistakes, but the passive system gives them a lot of opportunities to do so). Maybe fixing the 5-on-5 game is next on his list, even though it would have been at the top of mine.
Well, as of last night, I blame the 4th line. They got shelled, and so did Gorges and Gill, who incidentally had to play behind the 4th line. See a pattern emerging here? I mean, Cammalleri had a rough night and AKost and Pleks were underwater at times too, but they did create a bunch of chances. Métro’s line ate alive whomever the Isles fielded against them while Gomez’s threaded water.
I have my doubts about the “system” too, but I remember our brief stint as an outshooting team early in the year featured not only crappy opponents, but also a 4th line made of Chipchura, Latendresse and D’Agostini, a unit vastly superior to the current iteration (and I understand that’s not saying much).
I guess Pouliot is the solution then :)
Hmm, good point. Maybe that also helps explain why the Habs tend to be so terrible in the first period — that’s before Martin benches his fourth line which seems to happen every single night. And why the Habs manage to win games despite getting shelled like that — all those extra shots are taken by fourth-liners who generally aren’t exactly snipers.
It doesn’t explain why Laraque keeps getting icetime, though. I mean, I’m sure Pyatt couldn’t do much worse. Hopefully Pouliot’s return does bump Laraque out of the lineup, rather than do something weird like send Sergei to Hamilton.
Once Gionta and Pouliot are back I´d like to see a third line with Pouliot, Lapierre and Pacioretty. Lots of speed, some grit and some decent offensive potential (well for a third line…). Metro and Moen with Bergeron or Pyatt on the fourth line that could easily play 10-12 minutes? Also not that bad…
I suspect the Métro-Pax-Moen line is together for some time. Obviously, D’Agostini better make the most of his time with SKost and Gomez, because once Gionta’s back, Pouliot will allegedly already have bumped Laraque out of the lineup, which in turn means it’ll be between D’Ags and Lapierre for the last spot.

by 





















