Habs Perk Up A Bubbling Crude In Loss To Oilers
After being shellacked like a shithouse toilet seat in Vancouver last Wednesday, the Canadiens 3-2 loss in Edmonton represents a slightly more respectable showing for a group desperately in need of finding itself. There are still many wrinkles for Jacques Martin's iron to pass over, but which each passing game, the Canuck debacle notwithstanding, the coach is becoming better acquainted with the sure values on the club. In terms of optimism, it would seem at a glance that there is not much to get lit up about after five games. The Canadiens two wins in Toronto and Bufalo were robberies of the hot goalie variety, of which they suffered last night at the hands of Nikolai Khabibulin. The play of a select group of players offers quantifiable hope that better days are to come. Perhaps the best news is that a six game homestand awaits and that the annual western roadtrip - a perennial graveyard of losses for the Habs - is in the books for this season. Despite the shyish 2-3 record, it is clear that the trio of Scott Gomez, Brian Gionta and Mike Cammalleri - as a line itself, or not - represent the bulk of where the Habs offense will come from. All three, especially Gionta, have shown that they can create and produce sparks. More time together will benefit them, as will the last line change on home ice. As Martin often united the three, almost desperately it seemed, in spite of opponents easily matching their firepower with their top lines, much of what they bring was neutered. These three will clearly have more offer with the line matches working in their favor. Gionta, for one, has no quit in him. His goal against the Oilers late in the second period kept the Habs hopes alive where another rout might have seemed possible.
Carey Price, with two brilliant performances and a blowout behind him, was only so-so against Edmonton. He needs to be better in close games for the Canadiens to have a chance. Price's body language, during and after goals, tells a story every game and you can be sure coach Martin is taking note. There's an abundance of defeat in his bodily expression, where defiance is clearly needed. You could see Price almost express disgust with defensemen Jaroslav Spacek on Mike Comrie's first period marker, after the D-man extended his blade to deflect a shot on a play he rushed to get back into. Spacek never touched the puck, but it was close enough to throw Price off. When a goalie's confidence is shaky, such plays annoy. Spacek had pinched in the offensive zone and got caught. A smart move in the Habs end, with Comrie off to the wing, would have been to allow Price to make the save. With a slightly deflated goalie, the Canadiens let up in the second, and 2 of 6 Oilers shots put the game out of reach. Price thankfully settled down by the third, and a comeback was made possible by persistent Habs forwards. While I have yet to be convinced by the addition of Spacek, Paul Mara looks to be the better signing so far. Mara is offensively capable, defensively reliable, and a textbook example of a player performing within his means. That Mara is doing so in the extenuating circumstances of Andrei Markov's absence is even more appreciable. Along with sound values such Josh Gorges and Roman Hamrlik on defense, Mara and crew did well to keep a speedy Oilers bunch a 19 shots on goal. In their play, you can see a certain part of Martin's suffocating system of keeping shooters to the sidelines being instilled. Time and cohesion with forward lines can only help this aspect of the Canadiens game improve. What I love about Gorges is what unerves me about Hal Gill. Gorges is becoming know as a true warrior, one that rarely lets up despite the conditions he's up against. Constantly battling oversized forwards, Gorges wins puck battles and consistently makes the smarter plays because his feet never stop moving. He's insistantly moving, shoving and grinding out checks, poised and planned because he knows what to do with the play and the puck. Gill on the other hand, seems downright confounded by the plays that confront him. Despite his great reach, each puck at his feet seems to be either too far or too close for him to play with any sign of adeptness. Rarely does he use his reach to play a puck ahead for himself or a teammate. He repeatedly stumbles clumsily to la rondelle, his inept short strides being no help. In all honesty, if both Markov and O'Byrne were available, he'd be riding pine. You could almost predict the moment when Habs fans will begin handing him a rough ride. After a horrendous game in Vancouver, Yannick Weber was more composed against the Oilers. Still, I worry about the kid's confidence taking a shit kicking playing one level up from where he truly should be at the moment. In the AHL, his timing and poise would be better worked on. In the NHL, his mistakes will often end up in his own goal. It's just another reminder that the transition from junior to pro for an offensive minded defender cannot skip the essential steps.
Are you like me, perhaps wishing to see Tomas Plekanec center Gionta a little more often? The pair seemed to click some in preseason, and the former Devil appeared to be the best option for converting Plekanec's work into scoring chances. As it stands, Plekenec often seems weighted down with lame duck wings Max Pacioretty and Andrei Kostitsyn. The center, all things considered, is playing strong five on five hockey despite the lack of a foil on his wing. The problem for Martin is this: how does he remove Gionta from Gomez at the moment with such lacklustre showing from both Pacioretty and Kostitsyn? Pacioretty played some of his best shifts when removed from the second line, as his assets better suit the dirty work provided by third and fourth line duty and tasks. Kostitsyn started a game strong for a change, firing some wicked wristers in the game's opening shifts. After going dead from the neck up and quitting on a few plays he found a permanent seat at the end of the bench for the third period. With Kovalev gone, meet the Habs new enigma. Kostitsyn is many tooled player minus the toolbox, and his obvious detachment and oblivious commitment are starting to become major concerns. Maxim Lapierre, Guillaume Latendresse and Travis Moen will be a more effective third line once home ice matchups allow them to perform mainly against other third lines. All three have put in too many subtle minutes so far, but the effort seems to have occasional sparks. They need to be placed in a context where they are allowed to go on the offensive more often and get under opponents skins. Thus far, it's been hit and miss, and once their contribution steps up, their addition will be noteworthy. While he has only dropped the gloves once in five games, Georges Laraque has contributed more in five short games that he had all of last season. Unfortunately, what he's capable of bringing is often hampered by the slow footed Kyle Chipchura, an honest worker not blessed with the quickness his instincts require. Pacioretty makes this duo harder to tangle with, and he clearly reads Chipchura better than the lame Matt D' Agnostini can. The trouble with the latter for Martin is that he clearly suits the needs of centers Gomez and Plekanec better, but the work ethic hardly deserves the promotion to top six forward status. I was kind of caught off guard by the third period efforts of the occasional Chipchura, Laraque and Pacioretty combo. They kept the tempo up and helped maintain the efforts of the top line suitably well. Pacioretty was surpringly noticeable and creative more than he had been in previous games and just when I began wondering why Martin hadn't shortened the bench while trailing by two goals, the trio were providing some semblence of a suitable answer. Laraque even had me imagining that his first goal as a Hab isn't far off. I can actually envision it almost coming in the approaching homestand. Should I take a poll on this? One personal regret of mine as the game wore on was that I didn't choose this game to write down all the line combos Martin threw on the ice. Some worked better than others, but the deck was consistently being shuffled in creative ways that clearly kept the Oilers off balance. This is textbook coach work for road games for an old pro like Martin, who clearly has a bank of experience going head to head with counterpart Quinn. The shot totals tell that Martin won much of this battle despite the final tally on the scoreboard. After scrutinizing the Habs PK woes a day earlier, I was counting 21 seconds each time the kill was deployed, noting which players were out. Puck control off the first draw was much improved, as was the fight for the first loose puck. Plekanec, Moen, Gomez, Gill, Hamrlik and Gorges saw the bulk of PK time, with Gionta, Mara, Lapierre, Chichura and Spacek seing backup duty. I was comforted initially, not seeing Spacek on the first wave. Judging by his reaction, I'd bet that the Lapierre goal was good. He was directly on top of Khabibulin when he poked the puck beneath him. The trouble was, he's likely the only soul in the building who could have had the proper view. With cameras not able to catch it, a non-goal call had to be made. That's the breaks! I've held off bitching about the officiating until now. Clearly, it's as bad as it always has been, especially with the tolerance level raised to the rook. With so much let go, the chintzy hooking call on D' Agostini in the first really confounds, as does the lack of calls going the Habs way considering the shots margin. NHL officiating is clearly designed to baffle. With these five games in the books, we can now get excited about a more promising homestand and the prospect of seeing what this bunch can muster on home ice. Six games in eleven days against Colorado, Ottawa, Atlanta, the Islanders, Rangers and Isles again await. I'll go out on a limb and call 4 wins!
Photos courtesy of Montreal Canadiens.com
Canadiens Outshoot (and seemingly Outplay) Edmonton, come up short again Lions In Winter
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Some very good points
I especially like your observations about Gorges and Gill. I still don´t like the fact that Kostitsyn was benched. He was one of our better forwards in Calgary and Vancouver and yet he gets benched after three or four bad shifts and one stupid mistake? Moen was absolutely terrible (even more than the other forwards) in Vancouver and wasn´t. What kind of message does this send?
AK46 needs to do better, there´s no doubt about that but he also needs confidence to be shown in him (more than most of the other players I assume) and two capable linesmates.
4 wins at home? I would be happy with that.
I knew someone would write this and I don´t disagree but once again: AK needs confidence and good linemates. I can´t see how benching him will help. Martin should at least have given him a chance in the last two minutes.
Good linemates
He has consistently had Pleks at centre and has a young “power” forward to drive the net. The reason he was benched was because he cannot take games off…period. He is a good player, but 26 goals doesn’t make you more than a 1 hit wonder with “promise” until he gets older then he’ll be a free agent that could give an offensive “spark” to a team always trying to capture the glory of that 1 good year. If he doesn’t learn that lesson, then that is all he’ll ever be. We have all learned that in our mid 20’s in whatever our profession is, and that was the lesson Martin was giving AK.
If a bus driver zones out at work or a doctor checks out, people could die, so sitting a player that is sleep walking through a game is not the worst thing that ever happened. He is an important part of the team, but only if he pulls his weight.
by blockersave93 on Oct 11, 2009 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions
RE: Mara
Hey Robert:
Mara and the questionable officiating combined last night to give me an enjoyable moment.
You don’t go head hunting with your elbow aimed at a player who’s turned the other way without paying a price. Mara waited for the refs to call it; they didn’t and after Mara was sure it had been ignored he beelined for the offending oiler and let him have a few knuckles.
Offensive production, competence in his own end, and a finely honed instinct for justice: I’m happy with Mara so far.
Still, good as that was for team spirit, it also led to him being out of commission for 15 minutes, forcing the already-depleted Habs blueline to shoulder an even bigger load. This led to Spacek, Gill, Gorges and Hammer getting overused.
It’s perfect for him to do it occasionally, the team will deal with that, but if it is to become a habit I’d wish it be a FORWARD’s habit.
Carey Price
I really wonder when Carey Price’s mental strength, touted as a major asset before he joined the Habs, turned into this porcelain-fragile psyche. I think we’re trying to psychanalyze him a little bit too much in Montreal. Now we’re reading his body language.
As for the game itself, a game where you outshoot, outchance, and outplay the opponent and lose at the percentages is more encouraging than a game where you win doing the reverse. Games like that, in the long run, will get you more wins than losses. The Oilers are no world-beater, but it’s still good that the Habs did so well against them at evens. Yes, there were costly mistakes, but if you tilt the ice the right way more often than not the mistakes will come more from the other side.
Hockey’s a game where the best teams win only 66% of their game and where the better team on the ice doesn’t always win. While individual game results added up are what matters in the end, perhaps when evaluating team performance and projecting results we should be looking at trends rather than the W/L record. This game may have been the Habs’ best so far.
Then again, this being Montreal, there’s a certain tendancy to call the Habs “lucky” if they get outshot 35-17 and win by a goal, and “weak” if they outshoot the other guys 35-17 and lose by a goal.
Body language
Body language can mean a great deal. If you have a battler in goal that gets focused but energized after a goal it can be a good thing to have some fire, but I don’t think that is what we have seen from Price so far. He seems to be in between, not aloof enough to shrug off a goal but not firey enough to to shut down a team after an irritating goal.
Montreal does over-analyze goalie play, but Robert is onto something. Whether Price becomes more Osgood-like (casual) or more Hextall-like (ill-tempered) I would rather him get a persona and go from there. He is still a kid that is learning his keep, and his on-ice persona may not be set for a few years, but I bet we see one end of the spectrum or the other as his play improves.
by blockersave93 on Oct 11, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions
So disappointing to see this team repeating last years team, with failing to take leads in the first period. Playing from behind on a regular basis is only going to lead to a long and fustrating season. Seems like they need the opposing team to score first in order for them to realize it’s time to play.
Interesting read.
Both the entry and the comments, that is. I’m with MathMan in regards to Carey Price – I think some people are trying to read between the lines when there’s really nothing there. He’s had an okay start to the season. A very solid first two games, but then the team pretty much failed him in Vancouver and again, gave the Oilers a few gifts.
As for defense, all I can really say right now is that Gill really irritates me. He’s been like your typical oversized man – uncoordinated and slow. We can’t have that.
some people are trying to read between the lines when there’s really nothing there
Understand that I am in Price’s corner 100% with no ill will….
There is much material between the lines to read, and it’s not being invented. Price came billed as the coolest and calmest of goalies three seasons ago after winning the Calder Cup. After the Vancouver game, he punched a hole in the wall. In last season’s playoffs, there was the mock salute after a simple save. There have been other incidents. After goals, he tends to be looking a teammates’ way. He’s slow to get up after being beaten. At times he gives the impression of a man who’s up against the world, fending for himself, and it’s not far from the truth.
Gill was supposed to be an improvement on Bouillon.
Other than for changing a light bulb, or reaching to the top of the cupboard, I don’t see how.
He fights almost as poorly as Komisarek as well, and big guys who cannot fight are a liability in the sense that some little guy can beat him and energize the opposing team more.
"the loneliest man in sports"
I am sure that a lot of people here have read the espn article on Price from last January:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espnmag/story?section=magazine&id=3836512
There has been too much fanfare and too much pressure on Price.
Of course it is hard to resist considering his accomplishments prior to playing for the Canadiens. Roy and Dryden were afforded the luxury of making a surprise rise to stardom, and also evolving into the great career goaltenders they were. Neither of them were burdoned with the expectations of HAVING to lead the team at 20-22 years of age, and Dryden got to play for teams of the kind of quality that Price will never have in front of him. Not for the Canadiens, at least.
Price has been thrust into having to be the starting goaltender, be mature, be a leader, perform like an all-star, and lead the Habs to the Cup. At 21?
Since he was burdened with having to face the firing squad last Spring rather than have Halak bear some of that burden, the pressure only increased.
Should we really be expecting him to be “mature enough” to do all of these things?
He really should just be playing goal the best he can. That’s it. If he’s the starter, fine, if not, then ok. That will work itself out over time.
Martin and the team leaders need to step up and be more high profile to bear that burden and let the kids (which includes Price) develop. If not, then we have to accept that Price will book the first flight out of town when he gets the chance, probably develop into a fine goaltender like Luongo, who we can watch have success someplace else.
Thanks for adding this. Every single word is so true.
In hindsight, what might have been best for Price all along would have been to have a veteran goaltender alongside him. Huet possibly, if the salary would have kept him on board.
That is the problem with a cap world
Players are forced into roles they are not ready for because of $$ reasons. It is likely costing the league future superstars.
I fully supported what happened because they could not afford to keep Huet with Halak in the AHL. In 2003 the Habs would have resigned Huet and Price would have been eased into the starring role.
That being said, you need mental toughness and resiliency to play goal in Montreal. Price was heralded as being fantastic in game one and two. I thought he was very good, but he was not being bombarded with high quality scoring chances. Most of them were either perimeter based, or in tight where he could dominate down low.
When he was hung out to dry in Vancouver, all the shakiness easily returns. He has to ignore the hyperbole saying he is great and ignore the criticism when they rip him. He is another couple of years from taking the game by the throat and dominating.
Until then get used to the highs and lows of his previous six months, without Markov they are just not dominant enough to avoid it.
www.fantasysensehockey.net
This is why I think that the Canadiens should not be pushing either goaltender to be “the starter”. The team in front of the goaltenders have to accountable regardless of who is in net, and despite Price’s meltdown last spring, it was mostly the fault of the team in front of him.
Just like who will be the captain, that can work itself out over time. Plenty of teams have had success using two goaltenders regularly. Price and Halak should both be focused on one thing and one thing only: playing their best. Eventually, one emerges as the better full time choice perhaps.
By the way, I am writing from Cairo, of all places. Was in Paris the other day, and in the bookstore, force of Habit when I see things in French, beelined right for the sports section. Nothing other than football and cycling. :(
They don’t know what their missing.
Already with the brow beatings? Et tu halfnthebag?
I agree with everyone’s notes on Pleks, Mara and Jorges. Unfortunately I agree about Gill as well. The really unfortunate thing is that we have a soon to be starter in Carle (I chose him for a purpose) and we can’t afford to have Gill on the Farm. I do see that his role should be bottom lined as a stay at home in the defensive end. Nothing past the red line because he is too slow. I think that having both O’Burned Again and Gill on this roster really presents a wealth of opportunities for quicker teams to take advantage of us. Carle could begin his career as a Hab sooner than later if one of these two get the heave ho. I know its early for this talk, but, man, its hard to watch.
It does not help to have Chipchura in the lineup either if he can’t keep up with his line mates… who else could he play with? It’s not like we have Radek Bonk and Mike Johnson now… he would have fit in fine with those guys. You can’t teach a 30ish year old how to skate faster. Time for the pasture. Back to the AHL career from here.
I’m not sold on the assessment of D’Agostini. Be patient with him and Pach. Ones we should be more aggressive with include La-tenderness. The Quebec Press love this guy, and yes he’s improved over 3 yrs, but he has none of the pressure a Price has on him. Forgiving and loving is the press with La-tenderness and he is one of the guys I would like the media to turn on and see what happens. Motivation comes from different places and he’s definitely one to be pushed this year.
by Cruisin4aBruisin on Oct 13, 2009 4:20 AM EDT reply actions

by 
















